Small coronary calcifications are not detectable by 64-slice contrast enhanced computed tomography

Recently, small calcifications have been associated with unstable plaques. Plaque calcifications are both in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) easily recognized. However, smaller calcifications might be missed on MSCT due to its lower resolution. Because it is unknown to which extent calcifications can be detected with MSCT, we compared calcification detection on contrast enhanced MSCT with IVUS. The coronary arteries of patients with myocardial infarction or unstable angina were imaged by 64-slice MSCT angiography and IVUS. The IVUS and MSCT images were registered and the arteries were inspected on the presence of calcifications on both modalities independently. We measured the length and the maximum circumferential angle of each calcification on IVUS. In 31 arteries, we found 99 calcifications on IVUS, of which only 47 were also detected on MSCT. The calcifications missed on MSCT (n = 52) were significantly smaller in angle (27° ± 16° vs. 59° ± 31°) and length (1.4 ± 0.8 vs. 3.7 ± 2.2 mm) than those detected on MSCT. Calcifications could only be detected reliably on MSCT if they were larger than 2.1 mm in length or 36° in angle. Half of the calcifications seen on the IVUS images cannot be detected on contrast enhanced 64-slice MSCT angiography images because of their size. The limited resolution of MSCT is the main reason for missing small calcifications

Calcified plaque cross-sectional area in human arteries: correlation between intravascular ultrasound and undecalcified histology.

BackgroundThe purpose of this investigation was to quantify the amount of intralesional calcium detected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) compared with undecalcified histology in human arteries. This method preserves intralesional calcium and reduces sectioning artifacts, thereby providing an accurate measure of calcium plaque morphology.Methods and resultsTen arterial segments (5 coronary, 5 iliac) were obtained at autopsy. IVUS imaging was performed with a 4.9F catheter at an automated pullback rate of 1.0 mm/s. The undecalcified arteries were dehydrated in ascending alcohol and polymerized in glycol methylmethacrylate. The arteries were cut into 200-microm sections with an Isomet low-speed saw and stained with Goldner's trichrome. The lumen cross-sectional area, the calcium plaque cross-sectional area, the calcium plaque depth, length, and angle of arc of calcified plaque were measured from the IVUS images and histologic sections. In 24 selected cross sections, there were 38 separate calcium plaques. An independent observer correctly identified 34 of 38 calcified plaques for a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 97%. The total mean calcified plaque cross-sectional area measured from histology was 4.6 +/- 4.1 mm2 compared with 2.8 +/- 2.3 mm2 by IVUS (P =.002). Plaque depth measured by histology was 1.2 +/- 0.4 mm versus 0.7 +/- 0.2 mm by IVUS (P =.001). The length of calcium plaques measured by histology was 3.6 +/- 1.78 mm versus 3.6 +/- 1.5 mm for IVUS (r = 0.79).ConclusionsIVUS accurately depicts circumferential calcified lesions with high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (97%). However, IVUS underestimates the total calcified plaque cross-sectional area by 39%. This is mainly because of the inability of the ultrasound to penetrate intralesional calcium, which leads to an underestimation of the depth of calcium by 45%

Calcified plaque cross-sectional area in human arteries: correlation between intravascular ultrasound and undecalcified histology.

BackgroundThe purpose of this investigation was to quantify the amount of intralesional calcium detected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) compared with undecalcified histology in human arteries. This method preserves intralesional calcium and reduces sectioning artifacts, thereby providing an accurate measure of calcium plaque morphology.Methods and resultsTen arterial segments (5 coronary, 5 iliac) were obtained at autopsy. IVUS imaging was performed with a 4.9F catheter at an automated pullback rate of 1.0 mm/s. The undecalcified arteries were dehydrated in ascending alcohol and polymerized in glycol methylmethacrylate. The arteries were cut into 200-microm sections with an Isomet low-speed saw and stained with Goldner's trichrome. The lumen cross-sectional area, the calcium plaque cross-sectional area, the calcium plaque depth, length, and angle of arc of calcified plaque were measured from the IVUS images and histologic sections. In 24 selected cross sections, there were 38 separate calcium plaques. An independent observer correctly identified 34 of 38 calcified plaques for a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 97%. The total mean calcified plaque cross-sectional area measured from histology was 4.6 +/- 4.1 mm2 compared with 2.8 +/- 2.3 mm2 by IVUS (P =.002). Plaque depth measured by histology was 1.2 +/- 0.4 mm versus 0.7 +/- 0.2 mm by IVUS (P =.001). The length of calcium plaques measured by histology was 3.6 +/- 1.78 mm versus 3.6 +/- 1.5 mm for IVUS (r = 0.79).ConclusionsIVUS accurately depicts circumferential calcified lesions with high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (97%). However, IVUS underestimates the total calcified plaque cross-sectional area by 39%. This is mainly because of the inability of the ultrasound to penetrate intralesional calcium, which leads to an underestimation of the depth of calcium by 45%