3,186 research outputs found
Liberalism and the Moral Significance of Individualism: A Deweyan View
A liberalism which scorns all individualism is fundamentally misguided. This is the chief thesis of this paper. To argue for it, I look closely at some key concepts. The concepts of morislity and individualism are crucial. I emphasize Dewey on the "individuality of the mind" and a Deweyan discussion of language, communication, and community. The thesis links individualism and liberalism, and since appeals to liberalism have broader appeal in the present context of discussions, I start with consideration of liberalism. The aim is to dispute overly restrictive conceptions and explore a broader perspective. To bring the argument to a close, attention turns first to Dewey on value inquiry, to Dewey's "democratic individualism" (cf. Dewey 1939, 179), and to the concept of moral community. Disputing the acquisitiveness of utilitarian influences in classical liberalism, a Deweyan argument from the nature of moral community supports re-emphasis on individualism in contemporary liberal thought
Henry Cabot Lodge, Alexander Hamilton and the Political Thought of the Gilded Age
We are currently witnessing a renewal of broad public interest in the life and career of Alexander Hamilton ā justly famed as an American founder. This volume examines the possible present-day significance of the man, noting that this is not the first revival of interest in the statesman. Hamilton was a major background figure in the GOP politics of the Gilded Age, with the powerful US Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, Sr. drawing on Hamilton to inspire a new, assertive American role in the world. Hamilton was first prominent as a soldier and aide to General Washington, and believed in centralization of power in the federal government and an energetic presidency. He founded the American financial system as the first Secretary of the Treasury, and was a great moving force of Americaās first nationalist-conservative party ā the Federalists. As shown here, close scholarly attention to Lodgeās biography brings out the darker sides of the celebrated hero. Hamiltonās deeper conviction was the need of an elitist āaristocratic republic,ā and he was an advocate of military-commercial empire. The Gilded Age Hamilton revival helped inspire the Spanish-American war of 1898 and an American overseas empire. This book will be of interest for students and professionals in political philosophy, political science, American history and American studies
Does Language Determine Our Scientific Ideas?
SummaryThis paper argues that the influence of language on science, philosophy and other field is mediated by communicative practices. Where communications is more restrictive, established linguistic structures exercise a tighter control over innovations and scientifically motivated reforms of language. The viewpoint here centers on the thesis that argumentation is crucial in the understanding and evaluation of proposed reforms and that social practices which limit argumentation serve to erode scientific objectivity. Thus, a plea is made for a sociology of scientific belief designed to understand and insure socialāinstitutional conditions of the possibility of knowledge and its growth. A chief argument draws on work of Axelrod concerning the evolution of cooperation
Review of Ulrich Baltzer, "Erkenntnis als Relationengeflecht: Kategorien bei Charles S. Peirce"
This book arose from the authorās recent dissertation written under the Gerhard Schonrich at Munich. It focuses on Peirceās theory of categories and his epistemology. According to Baltzer, what is distinctive in Peirceās theory of knowledge is that he reconstrues objects as āknots in networks of relations.ā The phrase may ring a bell. It suggests a structuralist interpretation of Peirce, influenced by the Munich environs. The study aims to shows how Peirceās theory of categories supports his theory of knowledge and how āquestion concerning a priori structures of knowledgeā are transformed within this relational framework. A chief critical target is David Savanās semiotics, specifically the idea that āthe multiplicity of development of the categoriesā is āconditioned by nothing but the indefiniteness of
the categories.ā1 But in contrast with this, if there is any indefiniteness in the categories, they cannot fully direct their own application, and this is to say regarding them āthat our knowledge is never absolute but always swims, as it were, in a continuum...ā2 If the doctrine of continuity applies to the categories, they also have a continuum to swim in
GEOGRAPHY, ASSIMILATION, AND DIALOGUE: Universalism and Particularism in Central-European Thought
There are many advantages and disadvantages to central locations. These have shown themselves in the long course of European history. In times of peace, there are important economic and cultural advantages (to illustrate: the present area of the Czech Republic was the richest country in Europe between the two World Wars). There are cross-currents of trade and culture in central Europe of great advantage. For, cultural cross-currents represent a potential benefit in comprehension and cultural growth. But under threat of large-scale conflict, these locations have proved extremely dangerous.
Historically, Germany and Austria may be regarded as having had two chief models of their relationships to Europe. In the Holy Roman Empire, Germany was at the center of an aspiring āuniversalisticā European cosmopolitanism. (In some ways similar to the present situation of the European Union.) Austria maintained a great multiĀ¬cultural empire, until it was destroyed in the First Word War. Generally, middle-European powers have promoted the integration of European diversity, when peace and stability have been plausible objectives. But when European diversity has declined toward ethnic or national conflict, Germany has drawn away from Europe and into itself, seeking inner unity and distinctness to protect it against possible combinations of enemies. This is true of central Europe generally, in degree, but interest often centers on Germany. Generally, central Europe is a cultural pressure cooker
The Esoteric Quine? Belief Attribution and the Significance of the Indeterminacy Thesis in Quineās Kant Lectures
This is the Introduction to my translation of Quine's Kant Lectures. Part of my interpretation is that an "esoteric doctrine" in involved in Quine's distinctive semantic claims: his skepticism of the credulity of non-expert evaluation of discourse and theory
Emerson and Santayana on Imagination
This paper examines Santayana on imagination, and related themes, chiefly as these are expressed in his early work, Interpretations of Poetry and Religion (1900). My hypothesis is that Santayana under-estimates, in this book, the force and significance of the prevalent distinction between imagination and fancy, as this was originally put forward by Coleridge and later developed in Emersonās late essays. I will focus on some of those aspects of Santayanaās book which appear to react to or to engage with Emersonās views and aim to bring Santayanaās treatment of the theme of imagination into relation with Emerson. Understanding the differences in greater detail we stand a better chance of reasoned evaluation of alternative conceptions of imagination. I will argue that the Coleridge-Emersonian conception of the distinction between imagination and fancy is a crucial element of the background of Peircean abduction, and in this fashion, contributes to the continuity of Emersonās writings with the pragmatist tradition
Identity, Dignity and the Politics of Resentment: Limits of Globalization
In his 2018 book, Identity, the Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment, Stanford University politiĀcal scientist Francis Fukuyama addresses themes which might more properly be considered matters of political philosophy and the philosophy of law: How are we to navigate between traditional, ethnic, unitary conceptions of the nation on the one hand, and the threat of identitarian fragmentation on the other? Though Fukuyama affirms the importance of the concepts of human dignity and identity, more or less as these are commonly understood, he also criticizes the contemporary phenomenon of identity politicsāwhich he views as a danger to liberal democĀracy. āThe rise of identity politics in modern liberal democracies,ā writes Fukuyama, āis one of the chief threats that they face;ā and moreover, āunless we can work our way back to more universal understandĀings of human dignity, we will doom ourselves to continuing conflict.ā This paper raises the question of whether the well reasoned case against identity politics as a threat to national unity and purpose leaves room for skepticism of fast-paced and more ambitious (āWilsonianā) pursuit of internationalist goals of globalization. Greater emphasis on political consensus at home may helpfully strengthen the hand of American foreign policy in support of liberal democracy. But we now look back with well founded skepticism on neo-conservative interventionism, and there are just and needed limits on globalizing internationalism imposed by and implicit in the retreat from identity politics. Having lost the unity of purpose of Cold War liberalism, we are yet to find a āgolden meanā avoiding ethnic nationalism and short of political fragmentation.
This paper focuses on moral, legal and constitutional issues arising from debates and political conflicts centered on identity, human dignity, recognition and identity politics.[1] In his 2018 book, Identity, the Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment, Stanford University politiĀcal scientist Francis Fukuyama addresses themes properly considered matters of political philosophy and the philosophy of law: How are we to navigate between traditional, sometimes ethnic-racial or religious, and unitary concepĀtions of the nation-state on the one hand, and the threat of identitarian fragmentation on the other? Fukuyama affirms the importance of the concepts of human dignity and identity, and he also critiĀcizes contemĀporary identity politicsāwhich he views as a danger to liberal democĀracy. āThe rise of identity politics in modern liberal democracies,ā writes Fukuyama, āis one of the chief threats that they face;ā and āunless we can work our way back to more universal understandĀings of human dignity, we will doom ourĀselves to continuing conflict.ā Fukuyamaās criticism of identity politics has more recently found some parallels in writings of the prominent American journalist George Packer and his 2021 book, Last Best Hope. Drawing on Fukuyamaās arguĀments and Packerās complementary criticism from the center-left, this paper also raises a related question of whether the well-reasoned case against identity politics as a threat to liberal democracy, national unity, and purpose does not create greater room for a skepticism of fast-paced and ambitious (āWilsonianā), liberal-internaĀtionalist goals and globalization. Greater emphasis on political consensus at home may strengthen the hand of American foreign policy in support of liberal democracy, partly because we now look back with well-founded skepticism on neo-conservative interventionism and āforever wars.ā The argument is that just and needed limits on globalizing internationalism are implicit in the criticism of identity politics. Having lost the unity of purpose of Cold-War liberalism, we have yet to find a āgolden meanā avoiding divisive ethnic nationalism and identitarian fragmentation
Schelling and the Background of American Pragmatism:
The short cover-description of the present book tells that "Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling (1775-1854) was one of the formative philosophers of German idealism, whose great service was in the areas of the philosophy of nature, art, and religion." Those having some familiarity with Schelling, and his influence on American philosophy, indirectly via Coleridge and Carlyle and more directly via Emerson and C. S. Peirce, will perhaps not be surprised to learn that German idealism itself looks somewhat different, understanding Schelling's differences with Kant, Fichte, and Hegel; and while the work under review shows no awareness of the distant American influence of Schelling, or American developments in general (except perhaps in some citations of Arthur Lovejoy's The Great Chain of Being), I will take the present opportunity to emphasize connections and possible connections to American philosophy, as allowed by the author's account of Schelling and some further citations
- ā¦