Abbreviated MR Protocols in Prostate MRI

Prostate MRI is an integral part of the clinical work-up in biopsy-naïve patients with suspected prostate cancer, and its use has been increasing steadily over the last years. To further its general availability and the number of men benefitting from it and to reduce the costs associated with MR, several approaches have been developed to shorten examination times, e.g., by focusing on sequences that provide the most useful information, employing new technological achievements, or improving the workflow in the MR suite. This review highlights these approaches; discusses their implications, advantages, and disadvantages; and serves as a starting point whenever an abbreviated prostate MRI protocol is being considered for implementation in clinical routine

MRI of pelvic endometriosis: evaluation of the mr#Enzian classification and the importance of adenomyosis subtypes

PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the utility of the #Enzian classification in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for endometriosis assessment, focusing on inter-reader agreement, diagnostic accuracy, and the correlation of adenomyosis with deep endometriosis (DE). METHODS This IRB- approved retrospective single-center study included 412 women who underwent MRI evaluation for endometriosis between February 2017 and June 2022. Two experienced radiologists independently analyzed MRI images using the #Enzian classification and assessed the type of adenomyosis, if any. The surgical #Enzian classification served as the gold standard for evaluating preoperative MRI results of 45 patients. Statistical analysis was performed to assess inter-reader agreement and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS Inter-reader agreement was substantial to excellent (Cohen's kappa 0.75-0.96) for most compartments except peritoneal involvement (0.39). The preoperative MRI showed mostly substantial to excellent accuracy (0.84-0.98), sensitivity (0.62-1.00), specificity (0.87-1.00), positive (0.58-1.00) and negative predictive values (0.86-1.00) for most compartments, except for peritoneal lesions (0.36, 0.17, 1.00, 1.00, 0.26 respectively). A trend with a higher prevalence of concordant DE in women with MR features of external adenomyosis compared to those with internal adenomyosis was visible (p = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS The mr#Enzian showed mostly high inter-reader agreement and good diagnostic accuracy for various endometriosis compartments. MRI's role is particularly significant in the context of the current paradigm shift towards medical endometriosis treatment. The inclusion of information about the type of adenomyosis in the mr#Enzian classification could enhance diagnostic accuracy and inform treatment planning

AI-based automated evaluation of image quality and protocol tailoring in patients undergoing MRI for suspected prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) application in a clinical setting to decide whether dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences are necessary in multiparametric prostate MRI. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board and requirement for study-specific informed consent was waived. A mobile app was developed to integrate AI-based image quality analysis into clinical workflow. An expert radiologist provided reference decisions. Diagnostic performance parameters (sensitivity and specificity) were calculated and inter-reader agreement was evaluated. RESULTS: Fully automated evaluation was possible in 87% of cases, with the application reaching a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100% in selecting patients for multiparametric MRI. In 2% of patients, the application falsely decided on omitting DCE. With a technician reaching a sensitivity of 29% and specificity of 98%, and resident radiologists reaching sensitivity of 29% and specificity of 93%, the use of the application allowed a significant increase in sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The presented AI application accurately decides on a patient-specific MRI protocol based on image quality analysis, potentially allowing omission of DCE in the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected prostate cancer. This could streamline workflow and optimize time utilization of healthcare professionals

MRI-based monitoring of prostate cancer after HIFU: Inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance of the PI-FAB score

PURPOSE: To investigate inter-reader agreement, and diagnostic performance of the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) score applied to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in patients who underwent focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective, IRB-approved, single-center study, 73 men, who underwent focal HIFU treatment and received follow-up mpMRIs with subsequent prostate biopsies, were included. The PI-FAB score was applied to follow-up MRIs at 6, 12, and 36 months post-HIFU by two radiologists with different experience levels. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Gwet's AC1, and the diagnostic performance of the PI-FAB score was assessed in relation to histopathologic results of subsequent prostate biopsies for each reader. RESULTS: PI-FAB scores showed substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement (AC1: 0.80-0.95) and demonstrated high specificity (Reader 1: 90-98 %, Reader 2: 87-98 %) and NPVs (Reader 1: 91-100 %, Reader 2: 88-97 %) in ruling out residual or recurrent in-field prostate cancer post-HIFU. Sensitivity (Reader 1: ≥43 %, Reader 2: ≥14 %) and PPVs (Reader 1: ≥33 %, Reader 2: ≥14 %) were mostly relatively lower, with notable disparities between the two readers, indicating the potential influence of radiologist experience. CONCLUSIONS: The PI-FAB score provides a consistent and reliable tool for post-HIFU monitoring of prostate cancer using mpMRI. It demonstrates substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement and is particularly effective in excluding in-field residual or recurrent prostate cancer post-HIFU treatment. Its application can potentially enhance post-treatment patient care, emphasizing its value as a non-invasive MRI-based monitoring approach after focal ablative therapy of the prostate

Contrast media kinetics in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before radical prostatectomy predicts the probability of postoperative incontinence.

PURPOSE To evaluate the role of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as predictor of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). METHODS We analyzed patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer at our institution between July 2015 and April 2017. In these patients, we measured the perfusion quality of the pelvic floor with contrast media kinetics in the preoperative MRI of the prostate and compared the levator ani muscle (region of interest) to the surrounding pelvic muscle structures (reference). Prospectively collected questionnaires regarding urinary incontinence were then evaluated 1 year postoperatively. Outcomes were dichotomized into "continent" (ICIQ-Score = 0-5) and "incontinent" (ICIQ-Score ≥ 6). In each patient, we determined the perfusion ratio of the levator ani muscle divided by the surrounding pelvic muscle structures and compared them among the groups. RESULTS Forty-two patients were included in the study (n = 22 in "continent", n = 20 in "incontinent" group). The median perfusion ratio from the continent group was significantly higher compared to the incontinent group (1.61 vs. 1.15; 95% CI 0.09-0.81, p = 0.015). The median perfusion ratio in "excellent" (ICIQ-Score = 0) was significantly higher than in "poor" (ICIQ-Score ≥ 11) outcomes (1.48 vs. 0.94; 95% CI 0.04-1.03, p = 0.036). Further, a higher perfusion ratio was negatively correlated with ICIQ-Score (r = - 0.33; 95% CI - 0.58 to 0.03; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS Our data demonstrate a promising new strategy to predict PPI through the perfusion quality of pelvic muscle structures with contrast media kinetics. This may facilitate preoperative patient consulting and decision-making

Radiological imaging following pelvic prolapse surgery

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition in women, for which both conservative and surgical interventions are available. Knowledge of the different surgical procedures and the materials used is essential for adequate radiological diagnosis after prolapse surgery in order to differentiate potential complications from normal postoperative changes. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS In the immediate postoperative period, computed tomography (CT) is often the modality of choice for evaluating acute complications such as bleeding or organ injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft tissue contrast and is therefore generally preferred for assessing subacute and chronic complications. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS Innovative techniques such as dynamic MRI protocols can improve the radiological assessment after prolapse surgery by enabling the evaluation of organ mobility. PERFORMANCE Radiological standard procedures such as computed tomography (CT) and MRI provide detailed and reliable information about the postoperative site and potential complications following prolapse surgery. ACHIEVEMENTS Radiological imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients after prolapse surgery, particularly when complications are suspected. Accurate radiological diagnosis can guide further appropriate therapeutic measures

Risk factors for prostate cancer in men with false-negative mpMRI: A retrospective single center cohort study of image quality scores and clinical parameters

PURPOSE To identify predictors of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men with prior false-negative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), focusing on image quality scoring systems and clinical parameters. METHODS In this IRB-approved retrospective single-center study, patients with a negative mpMRI (PI-RADS score ≤2) and subsequent prostate biopsies were included. Histopathological results served as reference standard. Welch's t-Test was conducted to identify significant differences in image quality scores (PI-QUAL and PSHS) between patients with and without PCa/csPCA. In addition, clinical parameters (age, BMI, PSA density) and image quality scores (PI-QUAL and PSHS) were examined as potential predictors of PCa/csPCa detection after a false-negative mpMRI in uni- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Among 96 patients with negative mpMRI results, 44.8 % had PCa and 16.7 % had csPCa upon biopsy with histopathological confirmation. PI-QUAL scores were significantly lower in patients with PCa (p = 0.03) and csPCa (p = 0.005). PSHS scores were lower in patients with csPCa, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.1). Higher age (p = 0.035) and a lower PI-QUAL score (p < 0.004) were predictors of subsequent csPCa detection upon biopsy, however, a lower PI-QUAL score was the only independent predictor of missed csPCa in false-negative mpMRIs. CONCLUSIONS Lower image quality scores were associated with missed PCa/csPCa in patients with false-negative mpMRIs, with PI-QUAL being an independent predictor of failed csPCa detection. This highlights the importance of image quality for prostate MRI and advocats the inclusion of its measurement into the standardized report

Index lesion contouring on prostate MRI for targeted MRI/US fusion biopsy - Evaluation of mismatch between radiologists and urologists

PURPOSE: Mistargeting of focal lesions due to inaccurate segmentations can lead to false-negative findings on MRI-guided targeted biopsies. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine inter-reader agreement of prostate index lesion segmentations from actual biopsy data between urologists and radiologists. METHOD: Consecutive patients undergoing transperineal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy for PI-RADS 3-5 lesions between January 2020 and December 2021 were included. Agreement between segmentations on T2w-images between urologists and radiologists was assessed with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95 % Hausdorff distance (95 % HD). Differences in similarity scores were compared using Wilcoxon test. Differences depending on lesion features (size, zonal location, PI-RADS scores, lesion distinctness) were tested with Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation with prostate signal-intensity homogeneity score (PSHS) and lesion size was tested with Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (mean age 64.9 ± 7.1y, median serum PSA 6.5 [4.33-10.00]) were included. Mean similarity scores were statistically significantly lower between urologists and radiologists compared to radiologists only (DSC 0.41 ± 0.24 vs. 0.59 ± 0.23, p < 0.01; 95 %HD 6.38 ± 5.45 mm vs. 4.47 ± 4.12 mm, p < 0.01). There was a moderate and strong positive correlation between DSC scores and lesion size for segmentations from urologists and radiologists (ρ = 0.331, p = 0.002) and radiologists only (ρ = 0.501, p < 0.001). Similarity scores were worse in lesions ≤ 10 mm while other lesion features did not significantly influence similarity scores. CONCLUSION: There is significant mismatch of prostate index lesion segmentations between urologists and radiologists. Segmentation agreement positively correlates with lesion size. PI-RADS scores, zonal location, lesion distinctness, and PSHS show no significant impact on segmentation agreement. These findings could underpin benefits of perilesional biopsies

Variability of Manual Segmentation of the Prostate in Axial T2-weighted MRI: A Multi-Reader Study

Purpose To evaluate the interreader variability in prostate and seminal vesicle (SV) segmentation on T2w MRI. Methods Six readers segmented the peripheral zone (PZ), transitional zone (TZ) and SV slice-wise on axial T2w prostate MRI examinations of n = 80 patients. Twenty different similarity scores, including dice score (DS), Hausdorff distance (HD) and volumetric similarity coefficient (VS), were computed with the VISCERAL EvaluateSegmentation software for all structures combined and separately for the whole gland (WG = PZ + TZ), TZ and SV. Differences between base, midgland and apex were evaluated with DS slice-wise. Descriptive statistics for similarity scores were computed. Wilcoxon testing to evaluate differences of DS, HD and VS was performed. Results Overall segmentation variability was good with a mean DS of 0.859 (±SD = 0.0542), HD of 36.6 (±34.9 voxels) and VS of 0.926 (±0.065). The WG showed a DS, HD and VS of 0.738 (±0.144), 36.2 (±35.6 vx) and 0.853 (±0.143), respectively. The TZ showed generally lower variability with a DS of 0.738 (±0.144), HD of 24.8 (±16 vx) and VS of 0.908 (±0.126). The lowest variability was found for the SV with DS of 0.884 (±0.0407), HD of 17 (±10.9 vx) and VS of 0.936 (±0.0509). We found a markedly lower DS of the segmentations in the apex (0.85 ± 0.12) compared to the base (0.87 ± 0.10, p < 0.01) and the midgland (0.89 ± 0.10, p < 0.001). Conclusions We report baseline values for interreader variability of prostate and SV segmentation on T2w MRI. Variability was highest in the apex, lower in the base, and lowest in the midgland