3 research outputs found

    Integrating Surface and Sub Surface Flow Models of Different Spatial and Temporal Scales Using Potential Coupling Interfaces

    Get PDF
    The main objective of this research was to develop and utilize a coupled surface water groundwater model to simulate hydrological responses of watersheds. This was achieved by coupling the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) groundwater flow model, MODFLOW, and the rainfall runoff model, TOPMODEL, in one case study and coupling MODFLOW with a networked version of TOPMODEL called TOPNET in another case study. The model coupling was achieved using the InCouple approach, which utilizes Potential Coupling Interfaces (PCIs) that are abstractions from model flow diagrams that expose only those aspects of a model relevant to coupling. Coupling the rainfall-runoff models to MODFLOW involved development of a routine relating the spatial discretization of MODFLOW to TOPMODEL and similarly MODFLOW to TOPNET and development of a feedback scheme where groundwater and surface water interact in the soil zone. The key coupling concept was replacing the wetness index-based depth-to-water table concept of TOPMODEL with the groundwater heads simulated by MODFLOW. In the MODFLOW-TOPMODEL coupling, using data for the Tenmile Creek watershed, for the period, 1968 to 1972, it was concluded that the coupled model was able to continuously simulate the stream flow. However, the coupled model under predicted stream flow and did not agree well with observations in a point wise comparison. A mean coefficient of efficiency of 0.54 was obtained between simulated and measured stream flow. Only 24% of received precipitation was observed as baseflow and this shows that there is limited interaction between surface water and groundwater in the watershed. It was demonstrated using the coupled model that the lateral flow processes and the interactions between groundwater and surface water have a major importance for the water balance. For the Big Darby watershed, for the period 1992 to 2000, the coupled model adequately predicts the stream and groundwater flow distribution in the watershed. After model calibration, simulated groundwater showed the greatest residual variance, attributed to model error and uncertainty in model parameters. Model fit efficiencies of 0.61 and 0.69 were obtained for simulating stream flow measured at two gaging stations. The overall watershed hydrologic budget also showed small mass balance errors using the coupled model. However, the study also shows the need for further research in regard to constraining the groundwater recharge parameter which links the models

    Groundwater recharge rates and surface runoff response to land use and land cover changes in semi-arid environments

    Get PDF
    The effects of land use and land cover (LULC) on groundwater recharge and surface runoff and how these are affected by LULC changes are of interest for sustainable water resources management. However, there is limited quantitative evidence on how changes to LULC in semi-arid tropical and subtropical regions affect the subsurface components of the hydrologic cycle, particularly groundwater recharge. Effective water resource management in these regions requires conclusive evidence and understanding of the effects of LULC changes on groundwater recharge and surface runoff. We reviewed a total of 27 studies (2 modeling and 25 experimental), which reported on pre- and post land use change groundwater recharge or surface runoff magnitude, and thus allowed to quantify the response of groundwater recharge rates and runoff to LULC. Comparisons between initial and subsequent LULC indicate that forests have lower groundwater recharge rates and runoff than the other investigated land uses in semi-arid tropical/ subtropical regions. Restoration of bare land induces a decrease in groundwater recharge from 42% of precipitation to between 6 and 12% depending on the final LULC. If forests are cleared for rangelands, groundwater recharge increases by 7.8 ± 12.6%, while conversion to cropland or grassland results in increases of 3.4 ± 2.5 and 4.4 ± 3.3%, respectively. Rehabilitation of bare land to cropland results in surface runoff reductions of between 5.2 and 7.3%. The conversion of forest vegetation to managed LULC shows an increase in surface runoff from 1 to 14.1% depending on the final LULC. Surface runoff was reduced from 2.5 to 1.1% when grassland is converted to forest vegetation. While there is general consistency in the results from the selected case studies, we conclude that there are few experimental studies that have been conducted in tropical and subtropical semi-arid regions, despite that many people rely heavily on groundwater for their livelihoods. Therefore, there is an urgent need to increase the body of quantitative evidence given the pressure of growing human population and climate change on water resources in the region
    corecore