Universal Access To Interaction As Revealed By Uahci Words

The analysis of publications created over time as journal articles and other media is important to emphasize the interests, identity and culture in a certain research area. This paper proposes an analysis on the content of the Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI) conferences since 2007, based on information from the article titles. We were especially interested in knowing about changes in recent years related to user categories, the technologies used, and the processes associated with the systems engineering or with the human-computer interaction practices. Discussions are situated from the creation and observation of tagclouds formed with the data. As a contribution, we found what the words reveal about main trends of the area, the profile and the differences between the various editions of the conference, and also the gaps and potential for future research work toward accessibility and design for all. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.8009 LNCSPART 12130Soper, D.S., Turel, O., An n-gram analysis of communications (2000-2010) (2012) Communications, ACM, 55 (5), pp. 81-87Cerf, V.G., Why is accessibility so hard? (2012) Communications of the ACM, 55 (12), p. 7Bateman, S., Gutwin, C., Nacenta, M., Seeing things in the clouds: The effect of visual features on tag cloud selections (2008) Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 193-202. , HT 2008, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, June 19-21. ACM Press, New YorkRivadeneira, A.W., Gruen, D.M., Muller, M.J., Millen, D.R., Getting our head in the clouds: Toward evaluation studies of tagclouds (2007) Proceeding of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 995-998. , ACM Press, New York , CHI 2007, San Jose, California, USA, April 28-May 3Kuo, B.Y.-L., Hentrich, T., Good, B.M., Wilkinson, M.D., Tag clouds for summarizing web search results (2007) Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2007, pp. 1203-1204. , Banff, Alberta, Canada, May 8-12. ACM Press, New YorkStephanidis, C., (2007) HCI, pp. 4554-4555. , Part I, II, III. LNCS, 4556. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Stephanidis, C., (2009) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, , Part I, II, III, HCII 2009. LNCS 5614, 5615, 5616 Springer, HeidelbergStephanidis, C., (2011) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Part I, II, III, HCII 2011. LNCS 6765, 6766, 6767, 6768, , Springer, HeidelbergSellen, A., Rogers, Y., Harper, R., Rodden, T., Reflecting human values in the digital age (2009) ACM Communications, 52 (3), pp. 58-6

On Feelings Of Comfort, Motivation And Joy That Gui And Tui Evoke

New ways to interact with technology are gaining ground over the familiar Graphical User Interfaces (GUI). The Tangible User Interfaces (TUI) are one example of this. However, while it may seem intuitive that such interfaces should evoke rather positive responses from users - e.g. feelings associated with pleasure - little has been studied in this sense. In this challenge of understanding the feelings that GUI and TUI have the potential to evoke, we present our findings from a research that involved more than a hundred people. The research question that guided our endeavors was: What are the relations between the feelings of joy, motivation and comfort when using TUI and GUI? We analyze the results and discuss some hypotheses to explain the behavior observed. © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.8520 LNCSPART 4273284Bernstein, D., (2013) Essentials of Psychology, , Cengage Learning BelmontBradley, M.M., Lang, P.J., Measuring emotion: The self-Assessment manikin and the semantic differential (1994) Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25 (1), pp. 49-59Doering, T., Beckhaus, S., Schmidt, A., Towards a sensible integration of paper-based tangible user interfaces into creative work processes (2009) CHI 2009 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4627-4632. , ACM, BostonFishkin, K.P., A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces (2004) Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8 (5), pp. 347-358Garzotto, F., Gonella, R., An open-ended tangible environment for disabled childrens learning (2011) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 52-61. , ACM, MichiganHayashi, E.C., Baranauskas, M.C.C., The affectibility concept in systems for learning contexts (2011) International Journal for E-Learning Security (IJeLS), 1 (1-2), pp. 10-18Horn, M.S., Solovey, E.T., Crouser, R.J., Jacob, R.J., Comparing the use of tangible and graphical programming languages for informal science education (2009) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 975-984. , ACMIshii, H., Lakatos, D., Bonanni, L., Labrune, J.B., Radical atoms: Beyond tangible bits toward transformable materials (2012) Interactions ACM, 19 (1), pp. 38-51Ishii, H., Ullmer, B., Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms (1997) Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 234-241. , ACMIshii, H., The tangible user interface and its evolution (2008) Communications of the ACM, 51 (6), pp. 32-36Kaltenbrunner, M., Reactivision and TUIO: A tangible tabletop toolkit (2009) Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 9-16. , ACM, BanffNorman, D.A., Cognitive engineering (1986) User Centered System Design, pp. 31-61. , Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publisher, New JerseyNorman, D.A., Emotion &design: Attractive things work better (2002) Interactions ACM, 9, p. 4Oxford Dictionaries Language Matters, , http://www.oxforddictionaries.comPatten, J., Ishii, H., A comparison of spatial organization strategies in graphical and tangible user interfaces (2000) Proceedings of DARE 2000 on Designing Augmented Reality Environments, pp. 41-50. , ACM, New YorkRussell, J.A., Mehrabian, A., Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions (1977) Journal of Research in Personality, 11, pp. 273-294Strawhacker, A., Sullivan, A., Bers, M.U., TUI, GUI, HUI: Is a bimodal interface truly worth the sum of its parts? (2013) Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 309-312. , ACM, New YorkSylla, C., Branco, P., Coutinho, C., Coquet, E., TUIs vs GUIs: Comparing the learning potential with preschoolers (2012) Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16 (4), pp. 421-432Xie, L., Antle, A.N., Motamedi, N., Are tangibles more fun?: Comparing childrens enjoyment and engagement using physical graphical and tangible user interfaces (2008) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 191-198. , ACM, BonnXu, D., Design and evaluation of tangible interfaces for primary school children (2007) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, , ACM, Aalbor