The Mechanism and Pathways of Dopamine and Dopamine Agonists in Prolactinomas

Dopamine agonists such as bromocriptine and cabergoline are the predominant treatment drugs for prolactinoma by inhibiting prolactin secretion and shrinking tumor size. However, the pathways of either dopamine or its agonists that lead to the death of cells are incompletely understood and some are even conflicting conclusions. The main aim of this paper is to review the different pathways of dopamine and its agonists in prolactinomas to help to gain a better understanding of their functions and drug resistance mechanisms

Cassava genome from a wild ancestor to cultivated varieties

Cassava is a major tropical food crop in the Euphorbiaceae family that has high carbohydrate production potential and adaptability to diverse environments. Here we present the draft genome sequences of a wild ancestor and a domesticated variety of cassava and comparative analyses with a partial inbred line. We identify 1,584 and 1,678 gene models specific to the wild and domesticated varieties, respectively, and discover high heterozygosity and millions of single-nucleotide variations. Our analyses reveal that genes involved in photosynthesis, starch accumulation and abiotic stresses have been positively selected, whereas those involved in cell wall biosynthesis and secondary metabolism, including cyanogenic glucoside formation, have been negatively selected in the cultivated varieties, reflecting the result of natural selection and domestication. Differences in microRNA genes and retrotransposon regulation could partly explain an increased carbon flux towards starch accumulation and reduced cyanogenic glucoside accumulation in domesticated cassava. These results may contribute to genetic improvement of cassava through better understanding of its biology

Fruit Tree Legume Herb Intercropping Orchard System Is an Effective Method to Promote the Sustainability of Systems in a Karst Rocky Desertification Control Area

Karst rocky desertification control through the conversion of cropland to economic forest is vital for vegetation recovery and the alleviation of distinct contradiction between ecological conservation and economic development. To evaluate the sustainability of orchard systems from the perspectives of ecosystem and economic services, we employed emergy analysis for the comprehensive and quantitative assessment of two orchard system types: (1) mango monoculture (MM) and macadamia monoculture (NM) and (2) mango Vicia angustifolia intercropping (MVI) and macadamia Desmodium intortum intercropping (NDI). In the past, these areas were converted from a maize field (MF) in the southwest karst area of China. Our results showed that, compared to the MF, the total emergy input in monoculture orchards (NM and NM) decreased by 8.99% and 35.25%, and the economic profit (EP) increased by 20,406.57 and 114,406.32 RMB·ha−1, respectively. However, the non-renewable environmental input (energy loss of soil, SOM reduction, and irrigation water) still accounted for 43.25% and 62.01% in the total emergy input. After conversion to orchard legume herb intercropping (MVI and NDI), purchased resource inputs accounted for 86.36% and 68.20% of the total emergy input. Orchard legume herb intercropping further increased the EP, while improving ecosystem services and providing the capability for groundwater recharge, soil conservation, and soil carbon sequestration. The intercropping orchards were relatively sustainable from the view of economic and ecosystem services (EISD > 3.18), due to lower environmental loading ratios (ELR < 1.15), higher emergy yield ratio (EYR > 0.89), and economic output/input ratio (O/I ratio > 2.41). The integrated pest management simulations indicated that, compared to intercropping systems, the renewable percent (R%) and emergy sustainability index (ESI) of the scenario simulations (MVI-O and NDI-O) increased by 17.61% and 10.51%, respectively. These results suggest that integrated pest management is an effective method to improve the short-term sustainability of the orchard system. Therefore, the management of intercropped legume herb within an orchard system is an effective way to achieve sustainable development

Fruit Tree Legume Herb Intercropping Orchard System Is an Effective Method to Promote the Sustainability of Systems in a Karst Rocky Desertification Control Area

Karst rocky desertification control through the conversion of cropland to economic forest is vital for vegetation recovery and the alleviation of distinct contradiction between ecological conservation and economic development. To evaluate the sustainability of orchard systems from the perspectives of ecosystem and economic services, we employed emergy analysis for the comprehensive and quantitative assessment of two orchard system types: (1) mango monoculture (MM) and macadamia monoculture (NM) and (2) mango Vicia angustifolia intercropping (MVI) and macadamia Desmodium intortum intercropping (NDI). In the past, these areas were converted from a maize field (MF) in the southwest karst area of China. Our results showed that, compared to the MF, the total emergy input in monoculture orchards (NM and NM) decreased by 8.99% and 35.25%, and the economic profit (EP) increased by 20,406.57 and 114,406.32 RMB·ha−1, respectively. However, the non-renewable environmental input (energy loss of soil, SOM reduction, and irrigation water) still accounted for 43.25% and 62.01% in the total emergy input. After conversion to orchard legume herb intercropping (MVI and NDI), purchased resource inputs accounted for 86.36% and 68.20% of the total emergy input. Orchard legume herb intercropping further increased the EP, while improving ecosystem services and providing the capability for groundwater recharge, soil conservation, and soil carbon sequestration. The intercropping orchards were relatively sustainable from the view of economic and ecosystem services (EISD > 3.18), due to lower environmental loading ratios (ELR 0.89), and economic output/input ratio (O/I ratio > 2.41). The integrated pest management simulations indicated that, compared to intercropping systems, the renewable percent (R%) and emergy sustainability index (ESI) of the scenario simulations (MVI-O and NDI-O) increased by 17.61% and 10.51%, respectively. These results suggest that integrated pest management is an effective method to improve the short-term sustainability of the orchard system. Therefore, the management of intercropped legume herb within an orchard system is an effective way to achieve sustainable development

Protective Effects of Quercetin on Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury via the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway.

The present investigation was carried out to elucidate a possible molecular mechanism related to the protective effect of quercetin administration against oxidative stress on various mitochondrial respiratory complex subunits with special emphasis on the role of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) in mitochondrial biogenesis. Recently, quercetin has been proved to have a protective effect against mitochondria damage after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, its precise role and underlying mechanisms in traumatic brain injury are not yet fully understood. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of quercetin on the potential mechanism of these effects in a weight-drop model of TBI in male mice that were treated with quercetin or vehicle via intraperitoneal injection administrated 30 min after TBI. In this experiment, ICR mice were divided into four groups: A sham group, TBI group, TBI + vehicle group, and TBI + quercetin group. Brain samples were collected 24 h later for analysis. Quercetin treatment resulted in an upregulation of Nrf2 expression and cytochrome c, malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels were restored by quercetin treatment. Quercetin markedly promoted the translocation of Nrf2 protein from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. These observations suggest that quercetin improves mitochondrial function in TBI models, possibly by activating the Nrf2 pathway

Data Sheet 1_v1_One-and-a-half nostril versus binostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach to the pituitary adenomas: A prospective randomized controlled trial.docx

BackgroundBinostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (BETA) is the most used approach for sellar lesions nowadays, while its damage to the nasal structures may cause nasal discomfort and affect nasal functions including respiration and olfaction. With the purpose to improve the post-operative sinonasal quality of life (QoL), we introduced the one-and-a-half nostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (OETA) in 2016 which preserved more natural structures and registered a prospective randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR-IOR-16008222) to compare the two approaches regarding the surgical outcomes and complications.MethodsSixty patients with pituitary adenomas were recruited and randomly assigned to the OETA group and the BETA group between April 2016 and May 2017 in Jinling Hospital. The tumor resection rate, endocrinal and visual outcomes, and surgical complications between the OETA and BETA groups were analyzed. Besides, the questionnaire Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 (ASK Nasal-12) was used to evaluate patients’ sinonasal QoL at seven time points (pre-operative; 2-weeks, 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and long-term post-operatively). The Sniffin’ Sticks were used to assess patients’ olfactory function objectively in a long term. Each patient was followed for at least 12 months post-operatively.ResultsThere was no significant difference in tumor resection rate, hormonal and visual outcomes, and surgical complications between the two groups. Regarding the ASK Nasal-12, patients in the OETA group complained less about dried nasal material at 2 weeks after surgery (P = 0.017). One month after surgery, the OETA group had better olfaction function (P = 0.019) compared with the BETA group. However, there was no significant difference in early and long-term postoperative sinonasal QoL between the two approaches according to the entire ASK Nasal-12 metric. The results of the Sniffin’ Sticks showed that the two groups had a similar olfactory performance at long-time follow-up.ConclusionIn this single tertiary center trial, the results showed that the OETA achieved the same surgical outcomes and post-operative sinonasal QoL as the BETA. Clinical Trial Registrationhttp://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=13852, identifier: ChiCTR-IOR-16008222</p

Data Sheet 2_v1_One-and-a-half nostril versus binostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach to the pituitary adenomas: A prospective randomized controlled trial.docx

BackgroundBinostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (BETA) is the most used approach for sellar lesions nowadays, while its damage to the nasal structures may cause nasal discomfort and affect nasal functions including respiration and olfaction. With the purpose to improve the post-operative sinonasal quality of life (QoL), we introduced the one-and-a-half nostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (OETA) in 2016 which preserved more natural structures and registered a prospective randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR-IOR-16008222) to compare the two approaches regarding the surgical outcomes and complications.MethodsSixty patients with pituitary adenomas were recruited and randomly assigned to the OETA group and the BETA group between April 2016 and May 2017 in Jinling Hospital. The tumor resection rate, endocrinal and visual outcomes, and surgical complications between the OETA and BETA groups were analyzed. Besides, the questionnaire Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 (ASK Nasal-12) was used to evaluate patients’ sinonasal QoL at seven time points (pre-operative; 2-weeks, 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and long-term post-operatively). The Sniffin’ Sticks were used to assess patients’ olfactory function objectively in a long term. Each patient was followed for at least 12 months post-operatively.ResultsThere was no significant difference in tumor resection rate, hormonal and visual outcomes, and surgical complications between the two groups. Regarding the ASK Nasal-12, patients in the OETA group complained less about dried nasal material at 2 weeks after surgery (P = 0.017). One month after surgery, the OETA group had better olfaction function (P = 0.019) compared with the BETA group. However, there was no significant difference in early and long-term postoperative sinonasal QoL between the two approaches according to the entire ASK Nasal-12 metric. The results of the Sniffin’ Sticks showed that the two groups had a similar olfactory performance at long-time follow-up.ConclusionIn this single tertiary center trial, the results showed that the OETA achieved the same surgical outcomes and post-operative sinonasal QoL as the BETA. Clinical Trial Registrationhttp://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=13852, identifier: ChiCTR-IOR-16008222</p

Mononostril versus Binostril Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Approach for Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<div><p>Background</p><p>Over the past several decades, the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETA) has gradually become a preferred option of pituitary adenomas surgery because of its minimal invasiveness and high efficiency. However, some EETA operations were performed through one nostril (mononostril), while other EETA operations were performed through both nostrils (binostril). Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the pros and cons of these two methods in an attempted to confirm which method is more effective.</p><p>Methods</p><p>We executed a systematic literature search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science and Medline (1992–2015). The language is limited to English and all studies should meet the inclusion criteria. Comparisons were made for postoperative outcomes, complications, and other relevant parameters between the mononostril and the binostril group. Statistical analyses of categorical variables were undertaken by the use of Stata 12.0 and SPASS 19.0.</p><p>Results</p><p>Thirty studies, involving 4805 patients, were included. The two groups had similar results in GTR rate (included GTR rate of macroadenomas), hormonal remission rate, improvement in visual function, postoperative CSF leak, permanent diabetes insipidus, meningitis, and sinusitis. The binostril group had less temporary diabetes insipidus (2.9% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.022), less anterior pituitary insufficiency (2.3% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.000) and few hospitalization days (3.2 days vs. 4.4 days, p<0.05) than the mononostril group. However, the mononostril group had less rate of epistaxis (0.4% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.008) than the binostril group. For invasive macroadenomas, the binostril group seem to demonstrate a tendency towards better outcomes though there was no subgroup analysis between the two groups.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The binostril approach had less temporary diabetes insipidus, anterior pituitary insufficiency, and a shorter length of hospital stay, although they demonstrated a higher rate of epistaxis than the mononstril group. Additionally, the binostril group seemed to suggest a tendency towards better outcomes for invasive macroadenomas.</p></div