8,999 research outputs found

    Fundamental Plane of Black Hole Activity in Quiescent Regime

    Full text link
    A correlation among the radio luminosity (LRL_{\rm R}), X-ray luminosity (LXL_{\rm X}), and black hole mass (MBHM_{\rm BH}) in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and black hole binaries is known to exist and is called the "Fundamental Plane" of black hole activity. Yuan & Cui (2005) predicts that the radio/X-ray correlation index, ΞΎX\xi_{\rm X}, changes from ΞΎXβ‰ˆ0.6\xi_{\rm X}\approx 0.6 to ΞΎXβ‰ˆ1.2βˆ’1.3\xi_{\rm X}\approx 1.2-1.3 when LX/LEddL_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd} decreases below a critical value ∼10βˆ’6\sim 10^{-6}. While many works favor such a change, there are also several works claiming the opposite. In this paper, we gather from literature a largest quiescent AGN (defined as LX/LEdd<10βˆ’6L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd} < 10^{-6}) sample to date, consisting of 7575 sources. We find that these quiescent AGNs follow a ΞΎXβ‰ˆ1.23\xi_{\rm X}\approx 1.23 radio/X-ray relationship, in excellent agreement with the Yuan \& Cui prediction. The reason for the discrepancy between the present result and some previous works is that their samples contain not only quiescent sources but also "normal" ones (i.e., LX/LEdd>10βˆ’6L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd} > 10^{-6}). In this case, the quiescent sources will mix up with those normal ones in LRL_{\rm R} and LXL_{\rm X}. The value of ΞΎX\xi_{\rm X} will then be between 0.60.6 and ∼1.3\sim1.3, with the exact value being determined by the sample composition, i.e., the fraction of the quiescent and normal sources. Based on this result, we propose that a more physical way to study the Fundamental Plane is to replace LRL_{\rm R} and LXL_{\rm X} with LR/LEddL_{\rm R}/L_{\rm Edd} and LX/LEddL_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd}, respectively.Comment: 11 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journa

    Radiative heating in the kinetic mode of AGN feedback

    Full text link
    AGN feedback is now widely believed to play a crucial role in the co-evolution between the central black hole and its host galaxy. Two feedback modes have been identified, namely the radiative and kinetic modes, which correspond to the luminous AGNs and low-luminosity AGNs (LLAGNs), respectively. In this paper, we investigate the radiative heating in the kinetic mode. This process is potentially important because: 1) the radiation power of LLAGNs is higher than the jet power over a wide parameter range, 2) the spectral energy distribution of LLAGNs is such that the radiative heating is more effective compared to that of luminous AGNs with the same luminosity, and 3) most of the time in the lifecycle of an AGN is spent in the LLAGNs phase. In this paper, adopting the characteristic broad-band spectral energy distributions of LLAGNs, we calculate the value of "Compton temperature" (TcT_{\rm c}), which determines the radiative heating by Compton scattering. We find that Tc∼(5βˆ’15)Γ—107T_{\rm c}\sim (5-15)\times 10^7 K, depending on the spectrum of individual LLAGN and at which distance from the black hole we evaluate the heating. We also compare this heating process with other radiative heating and cooling processes such as photoionization/recombination. Our result can be used for an accurate calculation of the radiative heating in the study of AGN feedback.Comment: 9 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables. ApJ accepte

    Annihilation Rates of Heavy 1βˆ’βˆ’1^{--} S-wave Quarkonia in Salpeter Method

    Get PDF
    The annihilation rates of vector 1βˆ’βˆ’1^{--} charmonium and bottomonium 3S1^3S_1 states Vβ†’e+eβˆ’V \rightarrow e^+e^- and Vβ†’3Ξ³V\rightarrow 3\gamma, Vβ†’Ξ³ggV \rightarrow \gamma gg and Vβ†’3gV \rightarrow 3g are estimated in the relativistic Salpeter method. We obtained Ξ“(J/Οˆβ†’3Ξ³)=6.8Γ—10βˆ’4\Gamma(J/\psi\rightarrow 3\gamma)=6.8\times 10^{-4} keV, Ξ“(ψ(2S)β†’3Ξ³)=2.5Γ—10βˆ’4\Gamma(\psi(2S)\rightarrow 3\gamma)=2.5\times 10^{-4} keV, Ξ“(ψ(3S)β†’3Ξ³)=1.7Γ—10βˆ’4\Gamma(\psi(3S)\rightarrow 3\gamma)=1.7\times 10^{-4} keV, Ξ“(Ξ₯(1S)β†’3Ξ³)=1.5Γ—10βˆ’5\Gamma(\Upsilon(1S)\rightarrow 3\gamma)=1.5\times 10^{-5} keV, Ξ“(Ξ₯(2S)β†’3Ξ³)=5.7Γ—10βˆ’6\Gamma(\Upsilon(2S)\rightarrow 3\gamma)=5.7\times 10^{-6} keV, Ξ“(Ξ₯(3S)β†’3Ξ³)=3.5Γ—10βˆ’6\Gamma(\Upsilon(3S)\rightarrow 3\gamma)=3.5\times 10^{-6} keV and Ξ“(Ξ₯(4S)β†’3Ξ³)=2.6Γ—10βˆ’6\Gamma(\Upsilon(4S)\rightarrow 3\gamma)=2.6\times 10^{-6} keV. In our calculations, special attention is paid to the relativistic correction, which is important and can not be ignored for excited 2S2S, 3S3S and higher excited states.Comment: 10 pages,2 figures, 5 table

    Two-Body Strong Decay of Z(3930) as the Ο‡c2(2P)\chi_{c2} (2P) State

    Full text link
    The new particle Z(3930) found by the Belle and BaBar Collaborations through the Ξ³Ξ³β†’DDΛ‰\gamma\gamma\rightarrow D\bar D process is identified to be the Ο‡c2(2P)\chi_{c2}(2P) state. Since the mass of this particle is above the DDΛ‰(βˆ—)D\bar D^{(\ast)} threshold, the OZI-allowed two-body strong decays are the main decay modes. In this paper, these strong decay modes are studied with two methods. One is the instantaneous Bethe-Salpeter method within Mandelstam formalism. The other is the combination of the 3P0^3P_0 model and the former formalism. The total decay widths are 26.3 and 27.3 MeV for the methods with or without the 3P0^3P_0 vertex, respectively. The ratio of Ξ“DDΛ‰\Gamma_{D\bar D} over Ξ“DDΛ‰βˆ—\Gamma_{D\bar D^\ast} which changes along with the mass of the initial meson is also presented.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figure
    • …
    corecore