Dietary intake per day and Cardiometabolic traits of children by their dietary patterns.

<p>Plus-minus values are means ± SD.</p>*<p>There are significant difference among different patterns using GLM with p value <0.05, after adjustment for gender, age, by using general linear model factorial analysis, while, the school in study center was treated as a random effect variable.</p>abc<p>Values with different superscripts in the same row were significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test at p<0.05.</p

Classification of subjects by cluster analysis using factor score.

<p>Plus-minus values are means ± SD.</p>*<p>p<0.05 by analysis variance.</p>abc<p>Values with different superscripts in the same row were significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test at p<0.05.</p

Prevalence and odds ratio (<i>OR</i>) of obesity and related cardiometabolic disorders according to dietary patterns.

<p>Model 1: Logistic regression random-effects model adjusted for gender and age;</p><p>Model 2: Logistic regression random-effects model adjusted for Model 1 variable and feeding types, birth weight, parents’ weight, parents’ educational level, average family income per month per capita and study center (school in center);</p><p>Model 3: Logistic regression random-effects model adjusted for Model 2 variable and total energy intake (kcal/d) and physical activity energy expenditure (quartile).</p

Pattern loadings of the four major factor solutions after oblique rotation.

<p>Pattern loadings of the four major factor solutions after oblique rotation.</p

Characteristics of the subjects by gender.^*

*<p>means ± standard deviation (SD).</p><p><i>P</i> values for sex differences are based on t tests.</p

Characteristics of the study subjects according to dietary patterns.

§<p>There was significant difference among different patterns using chi-square test.</p

Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) by city in the nutrition & PA combined intervention group.

<p>^a For BMI, BAZ and overweight & obesity prevalence, the ‘effect’ means BMI, BAZ and overweight & obesity prevalence reduction (post intervention vs before intervention) in intervention group compared with that of in the control group, respectively. ^b ALL CER was presented in US dollars. ^c O & B means overweight & obesity. ^d Total’ means the average effect of four intervention centers (Jinan, Guangzhou, Harbin, Shanghai), Chongqing was excluded here because the intervention in this city was not effective (p>0.05). </p

Characteristics of the subjects at baseline by group.

<p>^a^b: Percentage shared the different letter means significant difference at baseline among groups in Beijing, p<0.05. ^* Significant difference (p<0.05) between control and Nutrition & PA intervention group. ^c statistical analysis and compare between intervention group with it’s control group. No superscript means no significant difference among groups.</p

The costs of development and evaluation of the program (RMB (US dollars)^<b>*</b>).

*<p>US dollars was calculated by Jan, 2010 exchange rate (6.8).</p

Anthropometric characteristics and obesity prevalence at baseline, after intervention and changes in different groups<b>^</b>.

<p>^{^} Continuous variables were expressed as mean±standard error.</p><p>^{a, b}: Means shared the different letter means significant difference at baseline among groups in Beijing, p<0.05. </p><p>^{c, d} : Means shared the different letter means significant difference of changes (post-intervention vs. baseline) among groups in Beijing, p<0.05.</p><p>^* Comparison the mean between post-intervention and baseline in each group, p< 0.05.</p><p>^# Comparison means between combined intervention group and control group at baseline as well as for changes (post-intervention vs. baseline), ^# p<0.05; ^## p<0.01.</p><p>^† OR and 95% CI for overweight & obesity prevalence using generalized linear mixed model, no significantly difference of OR between nutrition or PA individual intervention group with their control group, but a borderline difference between combined intervention group with its’ control group (p=0.06). </p