Levosimendan, a new therapeutic approach to prevent delayed cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage?

BACKGROUND Under physiological cerebral conditions, levosimendan, a calcium-channel sensitizer, has a dose-dependent antagonistic effect on prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF)-induced vasoconstriction. This circumstance could be used in antagonizing delayed cerebral vasospasm (dCVS), one of the main complications after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), leading to delayed cerebral ischemia and ischemic neurological deficits. Data already exist that identified neuroprotective effects of levosimendan in a traumatic brain injury model and additionally, it has been proven that this compound prevents narrowing of the basilar artery (BA) luminal area after SAH in an in vitro rabbit model. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, a severe ventricular dysfunction, is also a well-known complication after SAH, associated with pulmonary edema and prolonged intubation. METHODS The polypeptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) plays a key role in the development of dCVS after SAH. Therefore, the aim of the present investigation was to detect functional interactions between the calcium-sensitizing and the ET-1-dependent vasoconstriction after experimental-induced SAH; interactions between levosimendan and a substrate-specific vasorelaxation in the BA were also examined. It was reviewed whether levosimendan has a beneficial influence on endothelin(A) and/or endothelin(B1) receptors (ET-(A) and ET-(B1) receptors) in cerebral vessels after SAH. We also examined whether this drug could have antagonistic effects on a PGF-induced vasoconstriction. RESULTS Under treatment with levosimendan after SAH, the endothelin system seems to be affected. The ET-1-induced contraction is decreased, not significantly. In addition, we detected changes in the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (NO-cGMP) pathway. Preincubation with levosimendan causes a modulatory effect on the ET-(B1) receptor-dependent vasorelaxation. It induces an upregulation of the NO-cGMP pathway with a significantly increased relaxation. Even after PGF-induced precontraction a dose-dependent relaxation was registered, which was significantly higher (Emax) and earlier (pD2) compared to the concentration-effect curve without levosimendan. CONCLUSIONS After experimental-induced dCVS, levosimendan seems to restore the well-known impaired function of the vasorelaxant ET-(B1) receptor. Levosimendan also reversed the PGF-induced contraction dose-dependently. Both of these mechanisms could be used for antagonizing dCVS in patients suffering SAH. Levosimendan could even be used additionally in treating patients developing takotsubo cardiomyopathy

Occurrence of vasospasm and infarction in relation to a focal monitoring sensor in patients after SAH: placing a bet when placing a probe?

INTRODUCTION Vasospastic brain infarction is a devastating complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Using a probe for invasive monitoring of brain tissue oxygenation or blood flow is highly focal and may miss the site of cerebral vasospasm (CVS). Probe placement is based on the assumption that the spasm will occur either at the dependent vessel territory of the parent artery of the ruptured aneurysm or at the artery exposed to the focal thick blood clot. We investigated the likelihood of a focal monitoring sensor being placed in vasospasm or infarction territory on a hypothetical basis. METHODS From our database we retrospectively selected consecutive SAH patients with angiographically proven (day 7-14) severe CVS (narrowing of vessel lumen >50%). Depending on the aneurysm location we applied a standard protocol of probe placement to detect the most probable site of severe CVS or infarction. We analyzed whether the placement was congruent with existing CVS/infarction. RESULTS We analyzed 100 patients after SAH caused by aneurysms located in the following locations: MCA (n = 14), ICA (n = 30), A1CA (n = 4), AcoA or A2CA (n = 33), and VBA (n = 19). Sensor location corresponded with CVS territory in 93% of MCA, 87% of ICA, 76% of AcoA or A2CA, but only 50% of A1CA and 42% of VBA aneurysms. The focal probe was located inside the infarction territory in 95% of ICA, 89% of MCA, 78% of ACoA or A2CA, 50% of A1CA and 23% of VBA aneurysms. CONCLUSION The probability that a single focal probe will be situated in the territory of severe CVS and infarction varies. It seems to be reasonably accurate for MCA and ICA aneurysms, but not for ACA or VBA aneurysms

Number of patients according to aneurysm type, location of the probe and occurrence of infarction.

<p>MCA = middle cerebral artery; ICA = internal carotid artery; ACA = anterior cerebral artery; ACA = anterior cerebral artery; A1CA = anterior cerebral artery A1 segment, A2CA = anterior cerebral artery A2 segment: VBA = vertebrobasilary arteries.</p

Percentage of patients, by aneurysm type, with probe in the territory of vessel infarction.

<p>Percentage of patients, by aneurysm type, with probe in the territory of vessel infarction.</p

Clinical algorithm used to guide placement of sensor relative to the location of the aneurysm.

<p>MCA = middle cerebral artery; ICA = internal carotid artery; ACA = anterior cerebral artery.</p

Percentage of patients, by aneurysm type, with corresponding position of probe in relation to CVS.

<p>Percentage of patients, by aneurysm type, with corresponding position of probe in relation to CVS.</p

Effect of early palliative care for patients with glioblastoma (EPCOG): a randomised phase III clinical trial protocol

Introduction Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown a positive effect of early integration of palliative care (EIPC) in various advanced cancer entities regarding patients' quality of life (QoL), survival, mood, caregiver burden and reduction of aggressiveness of treatment near the end of life. However, RCTs investigating the positive effect of EIPC for patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are lacking. After modelling work identifying the specific needs of GBM patients and their caregivers, the aim of this study is to investigate the impact of EIPC in this particular patient group. Methods and analysis The recruitment period of this multicenter RCT started in May 2019. GBM patients (n=214) and their caregivers will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (receiving proactive EIPC on a monthly basis) or the control group (receiving treatment according to international standards and additional, regular assessment of QoL ('optimised' standard care)). The primary outcome is QoL assessed by subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for brain tumour (FACT-Br) from baseline to 6 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes are changes in QoL after 12 (end of intervention), 18 and 24 months (end of follow-up), the full FACT-Br scale, patients' palliative care needs, depression/anxiety, cognitive impairment, caregiver burden, healthcare use, cost-effectiveness and overall survival. Ethics and dissemination The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the local ethics committees of the University Clinics of Cologne, Aachen, Bonn, Freiburg and Munich (LMU). Results of the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed, open access journal and disseminated through presentations at conferences

Phase I/II trial of meclofenamate in progressive MGMT-methylated glioblastoma under temozolomide second-line therapy-the MecMeth/NOA-24 trial

Background: Glioblastoma is the most frequent and malignant primary brain tumor. Even in the subgroup with O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and favorable response to first-line therapy, survival after relapse is short (12 months). Standard therapy for recurrent MGMT-methylated glioblastoma is not standardized and may consist of re-resection, re-irradiation, and chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ), lomustine (CCNU), or a combination thereof. Preclinical results show that meclofenamate (MFA), originally developed as a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and registered in the USA, sensitizes glioblastoma cells to temozolomide-induced toxicity via inhibition of gap junction-mediated intercellular cytosolic traffic and demolishment of tumor microtube (TM)-based network morphology. Methods: In this study, combined MFA/TMZ therapy will be administered (orally) in patients with first relapse of MGMT-methylated glioblastoma. A phase I component (6-12 patients, 2 dose levels of MFA + standard dose TMZ) evaluates safety and feasibility and determines the dose for the randomized phase II component (2 x 30 patients) with progression-free survival as the primary endpoint. Discussion: This study is set up to assess toxicity and first indications of efficacy of MFA repurposed in the setting of a very difficult-to-treat recurrent tumor. The trial is a logical next step after the identification of the role of resistance-providing TMs in glioblastoma, and results will be crucial for further trials targeting TMs. In case of favorable results, MFA may constitute the first clinically feasible TM-targeted drug and therefore might bridge the idea of a TM-targeted therapeutic approach from basic insights into clinical reality

Fight INflammation to Improve outcome after aneurysmal Subarachnoid HEmorRhage (FINISHER) trial: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Rationale: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has high morbidity and mortality. While the primary injury results from the initial bleeding cannot currently be influenced, secondary injury through vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia worsens outcome and might be a target for interventions to improve outcome. To date, beside the aneurysm treatment to prevent re-bleeding and the administration of oral nimodipine, there is no therapy available, so novel treatment concepts are needed. Evidence suggests that inflammation contributes to delayed cerebral ischemia and poor outcome in SAH. Some studies suggest a beneficial effect of anti-inflammatory glucocorticoids, but there are no data from randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of glucocorticoids. Therefore, current guidelines do not recommend the use of glucocorticoids in SAH. Aim: The Fight INflammation to Improve outcome after aneurysmal Subarachnoid HEmorRhage (FINISHER) trial aims to determine whether dexamethasone improves outcome in a clinically relevant endpoint in SAH patients. Methods and design: FINISHER is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical phase III trial which is testing the outcome and safety of anti-inflammatory treatment with dexamethasone in SAH patients. Sample size estimates: In all, 334 patients will be randomized to either dexamethasone or placebo within 48 h after SAH. The dexamethasone dose is 8 mg tds for days 1-7 and then 8 mg od for days 8-21. Study outcome: The primary outcome is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months, which is dichotomized to favorable (mRS 0-3) versus unfavorable (mRS 4-6). Discussion: The results of this study will provide the first phase III evidence as to whether dexamethasone improves outcome in SAH

Liberal transfusion strategy to prevent mortality and anaemia-associated, ischaemic events in elderly non-cardiac surgical patients – the study design of the LIBERAL-Trial

Abstract Background Perioperative anaemia leads to impaired oxygen supply with a risk of vital organ ischaemia. In healthy and fit individuals, anaemia can be compensated by several mechanisms. Elderly patients, however, have less compensatory mechanisms because of multiple co-morbidities and age-related decline of functional reserves. The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether elderly surgical patients may benefit from a liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy compared to a restrictive transfusion strategy. Methods The LIBERAL Trial is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, controlled clinical phase IV trial randomising 2470 elderly (≥ 70 years) patients undergoing intermediate- or high-risk non-cardiac surgery. Registered patients will be randomised only if Haemoglobin (Hb) reaches ≤9 g/dl during surgery or within 3 days after surgery either to the LIBERAL group (transfusion of a single RBC unit when Hb ≤ 9 g/dl with a target range for the post-transfusion Hb level of 9–10.5 g/dl) or the RESTRICTIVE group (transfusion of a single RBC unit when Hb ≤ 7.5 g/dl with a target range for the post-transfusion Hb level of 7.5–9 g/dl). The intervention per patient will be followed until hospital discharge or up to 30 days after surgery, whichever occurs first. The primary efficacy outcome is defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute ischaemic stroke, acute kidney injury (stage III), acute mesenteric ischaemia and acute peripheral vascular ischaemia within 90 days after surgery. Infections requiring iv antibiotics with re-hospitalisation are assessed as important secondary endpoint. The primary endpoint will be analysed by logistic regression adjusting for age, cancer surgery (y/n), type of surgery (intermediate- or high-risk), and incorporating centres as random effect. Discussion The LIBERAL-Trial will evaluate whether a liberal transfusion strategy reduces the occurrence of major adverse events after non-cardiac surgery in the geriatric population compared to a restrictive strategy within 90 days after surgery. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03369210)