Surveillance for neuraminidase inhibitor resistance among human influenza A and B viruses circulating worldwide from 2004 to 2008

The surveillance of seasonal influenza virus susceptibility to neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors was conducted using an NA inhibition assay. The 50% inhibitory concentration values (IC50S) of 4,570 viruses collected globally from October 2004 to March 2008 were determined. Based on mean IC50S, A(H3N2) viruses (0.44 nM) were more sensitive to oseltamivir than A(H1N1) viruses (0.91 nM). The opposite trend was observed with zanamivir: 1.06 nM for A(H1N1) and 2.54 nM for A(H3N2). Influenza B viruses exhibited the least susceptibility to oseltamivir (3.42 nM) and to zanamivir (3.87 nM). To identify potentially resistant viruses (outliers), a threshold of a mean IC50 value + 3 standard deviations was defined for type/subtype and drug. Sequence analysis of outliers was performed to identify NA changes that might be associated with reduced susceptibility. Molecular markers of oseltamivir resistance were found in six A(H1N1) viruses (H274Y) and one A(H3N2) virus (E119V) collected between 2004 and 2007. Some outliers contained previously reported mutations (e.g., I222T in the B viruses), while other mutations [e.g., R371K and H274Y in B viruses and H274N in A(H3N2) viruses) were novel. The R371K B virus outlier exhibited high levels of resistance to both inhibitors (>100 nM). A substantial variance at residue D151 was observed among A(H3N2) zanamivir-resistant outliers. The clinical relevance of newly identified NA mutations is unknown. A rise in the incidence of oseltamivir resistance in A(H1N1) viruses carrying the H274Y mutation was detected in the United States and in other countries in the ongoing 2007 to 2008 season. As of March 2008, the frequency of resistance among A(H1N1) viruses in the United States was 8.6% (50/579 isolates). The recent increase in oseltamivir resistance among A(H1N1) viruses isolated from untreated patients raises public health concerns and necessitates close monitoring of resistance to NA inhibitors

Novel Druggable Hot Spots in Avian Influenza Neuraminidase H5N1 Revealed by Computational Solvent Mapping of a Reduced and Representative Receptor Ensemble

The influenza virus subtype H5N1 has raised concerns of a possible human pandemic threat because of its high virulence and mutation rate. Although several approved anti-influenza drugs effectively target the neuraminidase, some strains have already acquired resistance to the currently available anti-influenza drugs. In this study, we present the synergistic application of extended explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) and computational solvent mapping (CS-Map) to identify putative ‘hot spots’ within flexible binding regions of N1 neuraminidase. Using representative conformations of the N1 binding region extracted from a clustering analysis of four concatenated 40-ns MD simulations, CS-Map was utilized to assess the ability of small, solvent-sized molecules to bind within close proximity to the sialic acid binding region. Mapping analyses of the dominant MD conformations reveal the presence of additional hot spot regions in the 150- and 430-loop regions. Our hot spot analysis provides further support for the feasibility of developing high-affinity inhibitors capable of binding these regions, which appear to be unique to the N1 strain

Treatment of influenza with neuraminidase inhibitors: virological implications.

Evaluation of the emergence of influenza virus resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) is now demanded following experience with amantadinamines. Preliminary data have indicated that NAI-resistant virus is unlikely to emerge readily in the clinic and this is consistent with the difficulty experienced in selecting resistant virus in vitro. Resistance mutations can occur in both neuraminidase and haemagglutinin genes. The neuraminidase mutations are viral subtype specific and, therefore, clinically relevant subtypes must be employed for in vitro studies if pre-clinical data are to have predictive value. Haemagglutinin mutations generated in vitro are probably both subtype and cell culture system specific and, therefore, may not be predictive of clinical findings. Analysis of influenza-positive samples from NAI-treated patients in the clinical setting must include samples from late treatment time-points (day 4 and later) in order for resistant virus to be detected as in vitro studies and current clinical experience have indicated that resistant virus is slow to emerge and is transient

Standardizing the influenza neuraminidase inhibition assay among United States public health laboratories conducting virological surveillance

Background: Monitoring influenza virus susceptibility to neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors (NAIs) is vital for detecting drug-resistant variants, and is primarily assessed using NA inhibition (NI) assays, supplemented by NA sequence analysis. However, differences in NI testing methodologies between surveillance laboratories results in variability of 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values, which impacts data sharing, reporting and interpretation. In 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in collaboration with the Association for Public Health Laboratories (APHL) spearheaded efforts to standardize fluorescence-based NI assay testing in the United States (U.S.), with the goal of achieving consistency of IC50 data. Methods: For the standardization process, three participating state public health laboratories (PHLs), designated as National Surveillance Reference Centers for Influenza (NSRC-Is), assessed the NAI susceptibility of the 2011-12 CDC reference virus panel using stepwise procedures, with support from the CDC reference laboratory. Next, the NSRC-Is assessed the NAI susceptibility of season 2011-12 U.S. influenza surveillance isolates (n = 940), with a large subset (n = 742) tested in parallel by CDC. Subsequently, U.S. influenza surveillance isolates (n = 9629) circulating during the next three influenza seasons (2012-15), were independently tested by the three NSRC-Is (n = 7331) and CDC (n = 2298). Results: The NI assay IC50s generated by respective NSRC-Is using viruses and drugs prepared by CDC were similar to those obtained with viruses and drugs prepared in-house, and were uniform between laboratories. IC50s for U.S. surveillance isolates tested during four consecutive influenza seasons (2011-15) were consistent from season to season, within and between laboratories. Conclusion: These results show that the NI assay is robust enough to be standardized, marking the first time IC50 data have been normalized across multiple laboratories, and used for U.S. national NAI susceptibility surveillance