Capturing meaning-making in journalism

Performing content analysis is not merely a question of developing and using quantitatively-defined categories in order to investigate a research problem. If you want to go further and look at the meaning of the whole text, your analysis will meet challenges that go beyond numerical classification and coding. The strict numerical procedures of quantifying, classifying and counting often have the advantage of objective control and reliability within research communities. However, they tend not to capture the ways meaning is produced, communicated and understood.                       In this article we outline a dual procedure for the analysis of meaning-making in journalism. Using the software NVivo 8 we combine a qualitative and quantitative approach to the analysis of news texts. Following Franzosi (2010) we move “from words to numbers” and develop a methodological framework that supports investigation of the ways different cultural context, political reality and journalism culture generate narrative differences and produce alternative meanings. Our method consists of eight steps: 1) close reading of the text to identify the central organizing ideas of the story; 2) defining, naming and classifying these ideas as dominant story frames; 3) identifying variations within each frame; 4) defining, naming and classifying variations of frames as dominant story angles; 5) coding of news texts to identify frames and angles; 6) using NVivo to identify the frequency of the frames and angles appearance; 7) using NVivo to identify patterns of use in comparative perspective; 8)  interpreting data in the light of social and institutional context.                      We use the case study of the two year long newspaper coverage of the Tasmanian devils sent as a birthday gift to Danish Prince Christian to locate the process of meaning-making. Our analysis shows that the reconstruction of an event – a ’real story‘ – generates one or more story frames, which are related to the newsworthiness of the event, shared and hunted down by all journalists regardless of the country of origin or newspaper format. We found that journalists acted differently when refining frames into angles where the choice of angles relates to a specific national and media format setting.                       The main advantage of this applied method is the precision in identifying the journalistic tools used to produce a specific meaning

Aspekter af modale udsagns dybdestruktur

[Der findes ikke abstract til denne artikel

Journalism curiosity and story telling frame: A comparative study of Australian and Danish newspapers

This comparative study of journalism practices in Australia and Denmark explores the interplay between two concepts relevant for journalism's meaning-making activity: a curiosity seen as an action meant to close an information gap, and a story-telling frame seen as a form of structuring information which helps to define what is known of a topic. Using the newspaper coverage of events following the discovery of a “mysterious sickness” in the previous home of a group of Tasmanian devils sent to Copenhagen Zoo as a christening gift for the baby of the Danish royal, the article examines how the epistemological and organisational dimension of frames relates to the process of meaning making. We suggest refining the concept of frame in journalism studies by making a distinction between a frame (an epistemological category) and an angle (a textual organisation category). Our investigation shows that this distinction better serves the analysis and understanding of the mechanisms behind journalism in comparative contexts

Capturing meaning-making in journalism

Performing content analysis is not merely a question of developing and using quantitatively-defined categories in order to investigate a research problem. If you want to go further and look at the meaning of the whole text, your analysis will meet challenges that go beyond numerical classification and coding. The strict numerical procedures of quantifying, classifying and counting often have the advantage of objective control and reliability within research communities. However, they tend not to capture the ways meaning is produced, communicated and understood.                       In this article we outline a dual procedure for the analysis of meaning-making in journalism. Using the software NVivo 8 we combine a qualitative and quantitative approach to the analysis of news texts. Following Franzosi (2010) we move “from words to numbers” and develop a methodological framework that supports investigation of the ways different cultural context, political reality and journalism culture generate narrative differences and produce alternative meanings. Our method consists of eight steps: 1) close reading of the text to identify the central organizing ideas of the story; 2) defining, naming and classifying these ideas as dominant story frames; 3) identifying variations within each frame; 4) defining, naming and classifying variations of frames as dominant story angles; 5) coding of news texts to identify frames and angles; 6) using NVivo to identify the frequency of the frames and angles appearance; 7) using NVivo to identify patterns of use in comparative perspective; 8)  interpreting data in the light of social and institutional context.                       We use the case study of the two year long newspaper coverage of the Tasmanian devils sent as a birthday gift to Danish Prince Christian to locate the process of meaning-making. Our analysis shows that the reconstruction of an event – a ’real story‘ – generates one or more story frames, which are related to the newsworthiness of the event, shared and hunted down by all journalists regardless of the country of origin or newspaper format. We found that journalists acted differently when refining frames into angles where the choice of angles relates to a specific national and media format setting.                       The main advantage of this applied method is the precision in identifying the journalistic tools used to produce a specific meaning

Capturing Meaning-Making in Journalism

Performing content analysis is not merely a question of developing and using quantitatively-defined categories in order to investigate a research problem. If you want to go further and look at the meaning of the whole text, your analysis will meet challenges that go beyond numerical classification and coding. The strict numerical procedures of quantifying, classifying and counting often have the advantage of objective control and reliability within research communities. However, they tend not to capture the ways meaning is produced, communicated and understood.                       In this article we outline a dual procedure for the analysis of meaning-making in journalism. Using the software NVivo 8 we combine a qualitative and quantitative approach to the analysis of news texts. Following Franzosi (2010) we move “from words to numbers” and develop a methodological framework that supports investigation of the ways different cultural context, political reality and journalism culture generate narrative differences and produce alternative meanings. Our method consists of eight steps: 1) close reading of the text to identify the central organizing ideas of the story; 2) defining, naming and classifying these ideas as dominant story frames; 3) identifying variations within each frame; 4) defining, naming and classifying variations of frames as dominant story angles; 5) coding of news texts to identify frames and angles; 6) using NVivo to identify the frequency of the frames and angles appearance; 7) using NVivo to identify patterns of use in comparative perspective; 8)  interpreting data in the light of social and institutional context.                      We use the case study of the two year long newspaper coverage of the Tasmanian devils sent as a birthday gift to Danish Prince Christian to locate the process of meaning-making. Our analysis shows that the reconstruction of an event – a ’real story‘ – generates one or more story frames, which are related to the newsworthiness of the event, shared and hunted down by all journalists regardless of the country of origin or newspaper format. We found that journalists acted differently when refining frames into angles where the choice of angles relates to a specific national and media format setting.                       The main advantage of this applied method is the precision in identifying the journalistic tools used to produce a specific meaning

Capturing meaning-making in journalism

Performing content analysis is not merely a question of developing and using quantitatively-defined categories in order to investigate a research problem. If you want to go further and look at the meaning of the whole text, your analysis will meet challenges that go beyond numerical classification and coding. The strict numerical procedures of quantifying, classifying and counting often have the advantage of objective control and reliability within research communities. However, they tend not to capture the ways meaning is produced, communicated and understood. In this article we outline a dual procedure for the analysis of meaning-making in journalism. Using the software NVivo 8 we combine a qualitative and quantitative approach to the analysis of news texts. Following Franzosi (2010) we move “from words to numbers” and develop a methodological framework that supports investigation of the ways different cultural context, political reality and journalism culture generate narrative differences and produce alternative meanings. Our method consists of eight steps: 1) close reading of the text to identify the central organizing ideas of the story; 2) defining, naming and classifying these ideas as dominant story frames; 3) identifying variations within each frame; 4) defining, naming and classifying variations of frames as dominant story angles; 5) coding of news texts to identify frames and angles; 6) using NVivo to identify the frequency of the frames and angles appearance; 7) using NVivo to identify patterns of use in comparative perspective; 8) interpreting data in the light of social and institutional context. We use the case study of the two year long newspaper coverage of the Tasmanian devils sent as a birthday gift to Danish Prince Christian to locate the process of meaning-making. Our analysis shows that the reconstruction of an event – a ’real story‘ – generates one or more story frames, which are related to the newsworthiness of the event, shared and hunted down by all journalists regardless of the country of origin or newspaper format. We found that journalists acted differently when refining frames into angles where the choice of angles relates to a specific national and media format setting. The main advantage of this applied method is the precision in identifying the journalistic tools used to produce a specific meaning