Performance of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction models in male breast cancer patients

To establish whether existing mutation prediction models can identify which male breast cancer (MBC) patients should be offered BRCA1 and BRCA2 diagnostic DNA screening, we compared the performance of BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm), BRCAPRO (BRCA probability) and the Myriad prevalence table ("Myriad"). These models were evaluated using the family data of 307 Dutch MBC probands tested for BRCA1/2, 58 (19%) of whom were carriers. We compared the numbers of observed vs predicted carriers and assessed the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC) for each model. BOADICEA predicted the total number of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers quite accurately (observed/predicted ratio: 0.94). When a cut-off of 10% and 20% prior probability was used, BRCAPRO showed a non-significant better performance (observed/predicted ratio BOADICEA: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.60-1.09] and 0.79, 95% CI: [0.57-1.09], vs. BRCAPRO: 1.02, 95% CI: [0.75-1.38] and 0.94, 95% CI: [0.68-1.31], respectively). Myriad underestimated the number of carriers in up to 69% of the cases. BRCAPRO showed a non-significant, higher AUC than BOADICEA (0.798 vs 0.776). Myriad showed a significantly lower AUC (0.671). BRCAPRO and BOADICEA can efficiently identify MBC patients as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Besides their general applicability, these tools will be of particular value in countries with limited healthcare resources

Original Studies Outcomes of a Dedicated Stent in Coronary Bifurcations with Large Side Branches: A Subanalysis of the Randomized TRYTON Bifurcation Study

Objectives: To examine the benefit of the Tryton dedicated side branch (SB) stent compared with provisional stenting in the treatment of complex bifurcation lesions involving large SBs. Background: The TRYTON Trial was designed to evaluate the utility of a dedicated SB stent to treat true bifurcation lesions involving large (!2.5 mm by visual estimation) SBs. Patient enrolled in the trial had smaller SB diameters than intended (59% SB 2.25 mm by Core Lab QCA). The TRYTON Trial did not meet its primary endpoint due to an increased rate of peri-procedural myocardial infarctions (MIs). Methods: The TRYTON Trial randomized 704 patients to the Tryton SB stent with main vessel DES versus provisional SB treatment with main vessel DES. The rates of the primary end point of target vessel failure and the secondary powered end point of angiographic percent diameter stenosis in the SB at 9 months were assessed and compared between the two treatment strategies among patients with a SB !2.25 mm diameter at Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 00:00-00 V C 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

A Narrative Review of Ultrathin-strut Drug-eluting Stents: The Thinner the Better?

Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are considered standard of care for revascularization of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Besides the polymer and antiproliferative drug used, the metallic backbone of DES is an attractive target for further development. Ultrathin-strut DES (≤70 µm strut thickness) are more flexible, have an improved trackability and crossability compared to conventional second-generation DES. Importantly, ultrathin-strut DES reduce the risk of in-stent restenosis, thereby decreasing the risk of angiographic and clinical restenosis. In this narrative review, we will discuss the clinical outcomes of the commercially available ultrathin-strut DES

Self-expanding intracoronary stents in the treatment of coronary artery disease: new developments and future directions

The first stent implanted in the human coronary circulation was a self-expandable (SE) stent and was introduced almost simultaneously with the first balloon-expandable (BE) stents in the late 1980s. Nowadays, the majority of the available stents are delivered by balloon expansion. While BE stents reach their final size at the time of implantation, the SE stent continues to enlarge days to weeks after implantation. Potential advantages of the self-expandable and self-apposing properties of nitinol stents, a super-elastic metallic alloy of nickel and titanium, could be reduction of acute and late acquired stent malapposition with a subsequently decreased risk of target vessel restenosis. Several nitinol stents have been developed and clinically evaluated and are now in use in daily clinical practice. However, it is important to further improve and optimize the SE stent design and apply newer strategies to the development of next generation SE stents. The present review will provide an overview of the development of these devices and the currently available clinical evidence of the contemporary SE stent

Bioresorbable scaffolds: talking of a new interventional revolution

After the introduction of coronary balloon angioplasty, bare-metal, and drug-eluting stents, fully bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) could be the fourth revolution in interventional cardiology. The BRS technology shares the advantages of metallic stents regarding acute gain and prevention of acute vessel occlusion by providing transient scaffolding, while potentially overcoming many of the safety concerns of drug-eluting stents. Furthermore, without a permanent metallic cage, the vessel could remodel favourably and atherosclerotic plaques could regress in the long-term. This attracted increased interest and several BRS have been developed. In this review we will describe all BRS which are thus far clinically evaluated and provide an overview of ongoing clinical studies. Although the technology seems to be very promising, more studies including patients with more complex lesions are needed to evaluate whether the BRS can be used in daily clinical practice and if it is indeed becoming a new interventional revolutio

How to define bifurcation lesion complexity and how to successfully perform percutaneous treatment

Historically, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of bifurcation lesions have been associated with a lower procedural success rate, a higher complication rate, and less favorable clinical outcomes, compared to PCI of non-bifurcation lesions. However, percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions have been improved over the past decade due to improvements in stent design and the introduction of specific bifurcation stent techniques. Some even argue that PCI of bifurcation lesions should no longer be considered as being complex. However, recent studies have shown that there are still certain bifurcation lesion subtypes which are at higher risk for adverse cardiac events after PCI. Future efforts, including the development of a dedicated bifurcation device, should be focused on this specific high-risk subgroup, including distal left main bifurcation