35 research outputs found

    Fungi-Diet relationships.

    No full text
    <p>Heatmap of Spearman correlations between nutrient clusters and the bacterial and fungal genera detected in the dataset. Correlations which were considered significant using the Usual (A) and the Recent (B) diet data are marked with asterisks as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0066019#pone-0066019-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2A</a>. Domain membership is color-coded on the bottom.</p

    Archaea-Diet relationships.

    No full text
    <p>Heatmap of normalized average means for nutrient cluster measurements of the samples classified according to the dominant archaeal genus. Usual diet (A) and recent diet (B) relationships considered significant are marked with asterisks as described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0066019#pone-0066019-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2A</a>.</p

    Inter-generic relationships.

    No full text
    <p>The heatmaps quantify the intergeneric relationships. (A) Normalized z-score of the bacterial and fungal proportions for samples grouped according to their archaeal status (<i>Methanobrevibacter</i> positive, <i>Nitrososphaera</i> positive, or archaea negative). Asterisks indicate Kruskall-Wallis significant comparisons after FDR adjustment (FDR of 25, 20, 15, and 10% are marked with 1, 2, 3 or 4 asterisks, respectively). Domain membership is color-coded on the left. (B) Spearman correlations between Fungi and Bacteria. Asterisks in red indicate FDR adjusted significant correlations (FDR 20%) and the remaining raw p-values are shown to illustrate general patterns within the data (p-values < = 0.05, 0.01, 0.005, 0.001 are marked with 1, 2, 3 or 4 asterisks, respectively).</p

    The archaeal and fungal components of the human gut microbiome.

    No full text
    <p>The heatmaps show the relative proportions of microbial lineages detected by pyrosequencing. The lineages are marked on the right, with Phylum (abbreviated), Class, and Genus. Archaeal genera are shown in (A), representative bacterial genera in (B), and fungal genera in (C). The top two rows show the DNA yield from PCR amplification reactions, which serves as a rough indicator of abundance. Proportions were calculated within each amplicon (archaeal 16S, bacterial 16S, or fungal ITS) for each sequencing study separately. The abbreviations for phyla were as follows (Eur: Euryarchaeota; Tha: Thaumarchaeota; Act: Actinobacteria; Bac: Bacteroidetes; Fir: Firmicutes; Asc: Ascomycota; Bas; Basidiomycota). Other Ascomycota and Other Basidiomycota are composed of genera which were detected in only one sample (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0066019#pone.0066019.s010" target="_blank">Table S7</a> and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0066019#pone.0066019.s002" target="_blank">Figure S2</a> for a complete list of detected genera and their prevalence).</p

    Analysis of co-occurrence among microbial lineages scored using the Dice index.

    No full text
    <p>Dice indexes across all genera pairs present at a proportion > = 0.01 are shown as a heatmap. Clustering was carried out using Ward’s criteria, based on the Euclidian distance between each genus pair using their Dice index across all other genera. Domain membership is color-coded on the left. Data are summarized in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0066019#pone.0066019.s012" target="_blank">Table S9</a> and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0066019#pone.0066019.s013" target="_blank">S10</a>.</p
    corecore