4 research outputs found

    The Black Sea region: clashing identities and risks to European stability

    Full text link
    "The crisis over South Ossetia between Georgia and Russia that took place in August 2008 highlights the volatility of the Black Sea region as a new flashpoint in the common neighbourhood between Russia and the European Union (EU). What has made the conflict in Georgia so crucial to the EU is the fact that this is not to be seen as an isolated occurrence. The incidence has repercussions throughout a region that is marked by a plethora of challenges to political stability and democratic consolidation - factors that directly affect European security and welfare. This paper takes a look at the overall and specific challenges that the EU faces in dealing with the Black Sea region. The first section analyses the lack of a European and a regional strategy for the Black Sea states and discusses the competing cognitive labels that frame the Black Sea region's politics. The second section analyses the development of risks to stateness, democracy and economic prosperity in the region. Drawing on both analyses, the paper concludes by drafting suggestions for EU policy to strengthen a pro-European regional identity as well as hedge against risks for the Black Sea region." (author's abstract

    Europas ReifeprĂŒfung am Schwarzen Meer: das KrĂ€ftemessen in Georgien fordert die Emanzipation der europĂ€ischen Russland- und Ostpolitik

    Full text link
    "Die aktuelle Entwicklung im Kaukasus belegt, wie rasch ungeklĂ€rte Krisen in den Peripherieregionen der ehemaligen Machtblöcke des Kalten Krieges zu handfesten militĂ€rischen Konflikte werden können, die eine ĂŒberregionale destabilisierende Wirkung ausstrahlen. Auch wenn sich die Lage nach einem von den EuropĂ€ern vermittelten Waffenstillstand wieder beruhigt, so wird der georgisch-russische Konflikt um SĂŒdossetien und Abchasien die Weltgemeinschaft noch auf lange Sicht beschĂ€ftigen. Der verbale Schlagabtausch zwischen den USA und Russland zeigt, dass die Implikationen der Krise grĂ¶ĂŸer sind: So unterzeichnete Polen zwei Wochen nach Beginn der militĂ€rischen Auseinandersetzung in Georgien einen Vertrag mit den USA ĂŒber die Stationierung von Abfangraketen als Teil des US-Raketenabwehrschirms auf seinem Territorium. Die Ukraine hat Washington die Nutzung seines RaketenfrĂŒhwarnsystems angeboten, Russland drohte umgehend mit ernsthaften Konsequenzen, und setzte fĂŒrs erste seine Beziehungen zur NATO auf Eis. OberflĂ€chlich betrachtet handelt es sich bei dem Konflikt im Kaukasus um eine Auseinandersetzung ĂŒber die Interpretation und Umsetzung territorialer IntegritĂ€t, staatlicher SouverĂ€nitĂ€t und den Schutz ethnischer Minderheiten in einem multiethnischen Gebiet. Im Kern stellt er sich jedoch als der Versuch internationaler Akteure dar, ihren Einfluss auf die Peripheriegebiete des Kalten Krieges auszudehnen. Die VorgĂ€nge in Georgien und das diplomatische Folgespiel in den Vereinten Nationen stehen stellvertretend fĂŒr die Neuordnung der MachtverhĂ€ltnisse im Schwarzmeerraum, und die Verteilung der EinflusssphĂ€ren in einem Gebiet sich ĂŒberlappender NachbarschaftsrĂ€ume von EU, NATO und Russland." (Autorenreferat

    Crossroads of cooperation: the future of EU-Russian relations and the impact of the Baltic States

    No full text
    This paper discusses the role of the Baltic States in the relations between the European Union (EU) and Russia. Recently, new challenges have emerged in the relations between Russia and the EU: for example, after Russia had suspended oil supplies to the port of Ventspils, Lithuania threatened to support veto of Poland in February 2007 concerning the EU Partnership and cooperation agreement with Russia. In addition, the "color" revolutions taking part in Eastern Europe stimulate EU to strengthen the dimension of Eastern policy. However, the legal basis of relations between the EU and Russia no longer meets the reality, and new legal agreements require the approval of new Member States, where there are very skeptically-minded countries in respect of Russia (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania). The following questions are asked in the article: What kind of perception of security threats is predominant in the EU, Russia and the Baltic States? What are the interests of these subjects of the international relations in the development of mutual relationships? How Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania can contribute to the development of the cooperation politics between the EU and Russia? This article attempts to reveal the emerging differences in Eastern Europe not only between the EU and Russia, but also between the individual EU states which have different perceptions on energy security and other regional issues. The Baltic states as full members of the EU are facing serious challenges attempting to consolidate their interests and historic experience in the relations between the EU and Russia, and trying to meet the status of the defenders of the of EU policy reforms and the Eastern European transformation
    corecore