The ExPeCT (Examining Exercise, Prostate Cancer and Circulating Tumour Cells) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background: Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the second most common cancer in Ireland. Many men present with locally advanced or metastatic cancer for whom curative surgery is inappropriate. Advanced cancer patients are encouraged to remain physically active and therefore there is a need to investigate how patients with metastatic disease tolerate physical activity programmes. Physical activity reduces levels of systemic inflammatory mediators and so an aerobic exercise intervention may represent an accessible and cost-effective means of ameliorating the pro-inflammatory effects of obesity and subsequently decrease poor cancer-specific outcomes in this patient population. This study will assess the feasibility and safety of introducing a structured aerobic exercise intervention to an advanced cancer population. This study will also examine if the evasion of immune editing by circulating tumour cells (CTCs) is an exercise-modifiable mechanism in obese men with prostate cancer. Methods: This international multicentre prospective study will recruit men with metastatic prostate cancer. Participants will be recruited from centres in Dublin (Ireland) and London (UK). Participants will be divided into exposed and non-exposed groups based on body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 and randomised to intervention and control groups. The exercise group will undertake a regular supervised aerobic exercise programme, whereas the control group will not. Exercise intensity will be prescribed based on a target heart rate monitored by a polar heart rate monitor. Blood samples will be taken at recruitment and at 3 and 6 months to examine the primary endpoint of platelet cloaking of CTCs. Participants will complete a detailed questionnaire to assess quality of life (QoL) and other parameters at each visit. Discussion The overall aim of the ExPeCT trial is to examine the relationship between PrCa, exercise, obesity, and systemic inflammation, and to improve the overall QoL in men with advanced disease. Results will inform future work in this area examining biological markers of prognosis in advanced prostate cancer. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NLM identifier: NCT02453139. Registered on 12 May 2015. This document contains excerpts from the ExPeCT trial protocol Version 1.5, 28 July 2016

String Quartet No. 1

This music score was submitted for the Kaleidoscope 2020 Call for Scores, an open access collaboration with the UCLA Music Library

Preludes & Fugue

This music score was submitted for the Kaleidoscope 2020 Call for Scores, an open access collaboration with the UCLA Music Library

Concertino for Trumpet and Others

This music score was submitted for the Kaleidoscope 2020 Call for Scores, an open access collaboration with the UCLA Music Library

The “Comparative Growth Assay”: Examining the Interplay of Anti-cancer Agents with Cells Carrying Single Gene Alterations

We have developed a “comparative growth assay” that complements current assays of drug effects based on cytotoxicity. A co-culture of two cell lines, one of which is fluorescently labeled, is exposed to a cytotoxic agent and the proportion of fluorescent cells is compared with that of a baseline unexposed co-culture. For demonstration purposes, two HCT116 cell lines (an hMLH1 homozygous and an hMLH1 heterozygous mutant), altered by insertion of vector alone or the same vector carrying an insert for the expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), were exposed to numerous “anti-cancer” agents. The assay was further validated in a system of two cell lines differing only in the expression of the breast cancer resistance protein (BRCP). The assay allowed the estimation of the duration of action of a particular agent. Assessment of the agent's differential activity over a given time in culture could be expressed as a selection rate, which we chose to describe on an “average selection per day” basis. We conclude that this assay: 1) provides insight into the differential dynamic effects of chemotherapeutic agents or radiation; and 2) allows, through the use of matched cell lines, the investigation of critical physiologic features that govern cell sensitivity