The genetic basis of apparently idiopathic ventricular fibrillation:A retrospective overview

Aims: During the diagnostic work-up of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF), next-generation sequencing panels can be considered to identify genotypes associated with arrhythmias. However, consensus for gene panel testing is still lacking, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are often identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic testing and its results in idiopathic VF patients. Methods and results: We investigated 419 patients with available medical records from the Dutch Idiopathic VF Registry. Genetic testing was performed in 379 (91%) patients [median age at event 39 years (27-51), 60% male]. Single-gene testing was performed in 87 patients (23%) and was initiated more often in patients with idiopathic VF before 2010. Panel testing was performed in 292 patients (77%). The majority of causal (likely) pathogenic variants (LP/P, n = 56, 15%) entailed the DPP6 risk haplotype (n = 39, 70%). Moreover, 10 LP/P variants were found in cardiomyopathy genes (FLNC, MYL2, MYH7, PLN (two), TTN (four), RBM20), and 7 LP/P variants were identified in genes associated with cardiac arrhythmias (KCNQ1, SCN5A (2), RYR2 (four)). For eight patients (2%), identification of an LP/P variant resulted in a change of diagnosis. In 113 patients (30%), a VUS was identified. Broad panel testing resulted in a higher incidence of VUS in comparison to single-gene testing (38% vs. 3%, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Almost all patients from the registry underwent, albeit not broad, genetic testing. The genetic yield of causal LP/P variants in idiopathic VF patients is 5%, increasing to 15% when including DPP6. In specific cases, the LP/P variant is the underlying diagnosis. A gene panel specifically for idiopathic VF patients is proposed.</p

Inbreken in een pacemaker : Risico's van 'smart healthcare'-apparaten

Technological progress in healthcare offers a plethora of opportunities, but they also raise important issues, such as safety. Every year, around 18,000 electronic implants with a therapeutic function, such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), are implanted in patients in the Netherlands. Most of these devices are able to establish a wireless internet connection to share technical and diagnostic information remotely with healthcare providers. If the access to the device is not sufficiently protected, a security risk arises with potential health risks. Currently, the therapeutic advantages of an ICD outweigh the potential security risks associated with the device. For healthcare providers it is a challenge to conduct a proper risk assessment in this situation. It is therefore important that manufacturers improve estimations of risks associated with their products, that incidents are shared more widely and that independent quality assurance testing is conducted

State-of-the-Art Multimodality Imaging in Sudden Cardiac Arrest with Focus on Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation:A Review

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation is a rare cause of sudden cardiac arrest and a diagnosis by exclusion. Unraveling the mechanism of ventricular fibrillation is important for targeted management, and potentially for initiating family screening. Sudden cardiac arrest survivors undergo extensive clinical testing, with a growing role for multimodality imaging, before diagnosing "idiopathic" ventricular fibrillation. Multimodality imaging, considered as using multiple imaging modalities as diagnostics, is important for revealing structural myocardial abnormalities in patients with cardiac arrest. This review focuses on combining imaging modalities (echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography) and the electrocardiographic characterization of sudden cardiac arrest survivors and discusses the surplus value of multimodality imaging in the diagnostic routing of these patients. We focus on novel insights obtained through electrostructural and/or electromechanical imaging in apparently idiopathic ventricular fibrillation patients, with special attention to non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging

Mitral Annular Disjunction in Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Patients: Just a Bystander or a Potential Cause?

Aims:Previously, we demonstrated that inferolateral mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is more prevalent in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) than in healthy controls. In the present study, we advanced the insights into the prevalence and ventricular arrhythmogenicity by inferolateral MAD in an even larger IVF cohort.Methods and results:This retrospective multicentre study included 185 IVF patients (median age 39 [27, 52] years, 40% female). Cardiac magnetic resonance images were analysed for mitral valve and annular abnormalities and late gadolinium enhancement. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without MAD. MAD in any of the 4 locations was present in 112 (61%) IVF patients and inferolateral MAD was identified in 24 (13%) IVF patients. Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) was found in 13 (7%) IVF patients. MVP was more prevalent in patients with inferolateral MAD compared with patients without inferolateral MAD(42% vs. 2%, p &lt; 0.001). Proarrhythmic characteristics in terms of a high burden of premature ventricular complexes (PVC) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) were more prevalent in patients with inferolateral MAD compared to patients without inferolateral MAD (67% vs. 23%, p &lt; 0.001 and 63% vs 41%, p = 0.046, respectively). Appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy during follow-up was comparable for IVF patients with or without inferolateral MAD (13% vs. 18%, p = 0.579).Conclusion:A high prevalence of inferolateral MAD and MVP is a consistent finding in this large IVF cohort. The presence of inferolateral MAD is associated with a higher PVC burden and non-sustained VTs. Further research is needed to explain this potential interplay

Prevalence of Mitral Annulus Disjunction and Mitral Valve Prolapse in Patients With Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation

Background Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is diagnosed in patients with ventricular fibrillation of which the origin is not identified after extensive evaluations. Recent studies suggest an association between mitral annulus disjunction (MAD), mitral valve prolapse (MVP), and ventricular arrhythmias. The prevalence of MAD and MVP in patients with IVF in this regard is not well established. We aimed to explore the prevalence of MAD and MVP in a consecutive cohort of patients with IVF compared with matched controls. Methods and Results In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, cardiac magnetic resonance images from patients with IVF (ie, negative for ischemia, cardiomyopathy, and channelopathies) and age- and sex-matched control subjects were analyzed for the presence of MAD (≥2 mm) and MVP (>2 mm). In total, 72 patients (mean age 39±14 years, 42% women) and 72 control subjects (mean age 41±11 years, 42% women) were included. MAD in the inferolateral wall was more prevalent in patients with IVF versus healthy controls (7 [11%] versus 1 [1%], P=0.024). MVP was only seen in patients with IVF and not in controls (5 [7%] versus 0 [0%], P=0.016). MAD was observed in both patients with (n=4) and without (n=3) MVP. Conclusions Inferolateral MAD and MVP were significantly more prevalent in patients with IVF compared with healthy controls. The authors advocate that evaluation of the mitral valve region deserves extra attention in the extensive screening of patients with unexplained cardiac arrest. These findings support further exploration of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying a subset of IVF that associates with MAD and MVP

Echocardiographic deformation imaging unmasks global and regional mechanical dysfunction in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: A multicenter case-control study

Background: Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is diagnosed in patients with sudden onset of ventricular fibrillation of unidentified origin. New diagnostic tools that can detect subtle abnormalities are needed to diagnose and treat patients with an underlying substrate. Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore echocardiographic deformation characteristics in IVF patients. Methods: Echocardiograms were analyzed with deformation imaging by 2-dimensional speckle tracking. Global and regional measurements of the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) were performed. Regional LV deformation patterns were evaluated for the presence of postsystolic shortening. Regional RV deformation patterns were classified as type I (normal) or type II/III (abnormal). Results: In total, 47 IVF patients (mean age 45 years; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 56%) and 47 healthy controls (mean age 41 years; LVEF 60%) were included. IVF patients showed more global deformation abnormalities as indicated by lower LV global longitudinal strain (18.5% ± 2.6% vs 21.6% ± 1.8%; P <.001) and higher LV mechanical dispersion (41 ± 12 ms vs 26 ± 6 ms; P <.001). In addition, IVF patients showed more regional LV postsystolic shortening compared to healthy controls (50% vs 11%; P <.001). Abnormal RV deformation patterns were observed in 16% of IVF patients and in none of the control subjects (P <.001). Conclusion: We were able to show both regional and global echocardiographic deformation abnormalities in IVF patients. This study provides evidence that localized myocardial disease is present in a subset of IVF patients

The Importance of Systematic Diagnostic Testing in Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation: Results From the Dutch iVF-Registry

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (iVF) is a diagnosis of exclusion. Systematic diagnostic testing is important to exclude alternative causes for VF. The early use of "high yield" testing, including cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), exercise testing, and sodium channel blocker provocation, has been increasingly recognized. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the importance and consistency of systematic diagnostic testing in iVF. METHODS: This study included 423 iVF patients from 11 large secondary and tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands. Clinical characteristics and diagnostic testing data were ascertained. RESULTS: IVF patients experienced the index event at a median age of 40 years (IQR: 28-52 years), and 61% were men. The median follow-up time was 6 years (IQR: 2-12 years). Over the years, "high yield" diagnostic tests were increasingly performed (mean 68% in 2000-2010 vs 75% in 2011-2021; P < 0.001). During follow-up, 38 patients (9%) originally labeled as iVF received an alternative diagnosis. Patients in whom "high-yield" diagnostic tests were consistently performed during the initial work-up received an alternative diagnosis less frequently during follow-up (HR: 0.439; 95% CI: 0.219-0.878; P = 0.020). Patients who received an alternative diagnosis during follow-up had a worse prognosis in terms of cardiac death (P = 0.012) with a trend toward more implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy (P = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS: Although adherence to (near) complete diagnostic testing in this population of iVF patients increased over the years, patients with iVF still undergo varying levels of diagnostic evaluation. The latter leads to initial underdiagnosis of alternative conditions and is associated with a worse prognosis. Our results underscore the importance of early systematic diagnostic assessment in patients with apparent iVF