42 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Joint Time-Lapse Acquisition and Inversion of Passive Seismic and Magnetotelluric Data for Monitoring Reservoir Processes at The Geysers Geothermal Field
This project successfully implemented an approach to jointly image time-lapse changes in water and steam concentrations and subsurface flow in a geothermal reservoir, using data from small earthquakes and magnetotelluric observations. The project advanced the technology by imaging time-lapse changes of the two data sets, based on different physical properties, for the first time. The project demonstrated this technology at The Geysers geothermal field in Northern California over an area of approximately 75 square kilometers, where seismic and magnetotelluric data were collected over several years. The project team collected seismic data from over 280,000 earthquakes and collected three magnetotelluric surveys to generate images of water and steam volumes as well as flow paths and barriers in the geothermal reservoir. Correlation of the geophysical images with known water injection and steam production volumes allowed the team to calibrate the data and to gain confidence in the results, which can now be applied throughout the reservoir, where borehole data are unavailable. The results of the joint imaging, together with reservoir data derived from observations in boreholes, allow interpretation of the images to identify water and steam saturated zones, as well as fluid pathways and barriers. This information allows the reservoir operator to improve its drilling program by minimizing drilling of unsuccessful wells, resulting in reduced costs and lower electricity rates for California ratepayers
Subsurface void detection using seismic tomographic imaging
Tomographic imaging has been widely used in scientific and medical fields to remotely image media in a nondestructive way. This paper introduces a spectrum of seismic imaging applications to detect and characterize voids in coal mines. The application of seismic waves to detect changes in coal relies on two types of waves: body waves refracted along the interface between coal and bedrock (i.e., refracted P-waves) and channel waves that propagate directly through the coal (dispersive wave trains of the Rayleigh or Love type). For example, a P-wave tomography study to find underlying old mine workings in a coal mine in England, produced velocity patterns that revealed increases in velocity where high stress concentrations occur in the rock, which are most likely connected to old pillars left in support of the old working areas. At the same time, low velocities were found in areas of low stress concentrations, which are related to roof collapses indicating the locations of mined areas below. The application of channel wave tomography to directly image the presence of gaseous CO{sub 2} in a low velocity oil reservoir showed that the injected CO{sub 2} followed an ancient flow channel in the reservoir migrating from the injector to the producer well. The study showed how channel waves are preferable over refracted P-waves, as the latter were only marginally affected by the presence of the gas in the low-velocity channel. Similar approaches show great promise for the detection of voids in coal mines. Finally, a newly developed technique, based on scattering theory, revealed that the location and the size of a subsurface cavity could be accurately determined even in the presence of strong correlated and uncorrelated noise
Recommended from our members
Development and application of 3-D seismic imaging methods for geothermal environments
Recommended from our members
Core evaluation of hydrologic and seismic properties of methane-bearing coals
In the last 10 years, coalbed methane (CBM) has transformed from a coal-mine hazard to a clean burning source of long term natural gas. The benefit of methane as an energy source in conjunction with vast amounts stored in coal basins has led to the development of an industry that produces CBM. Reducing the emission of green house gases to the atmosphere through carbon dioxide injection into coal has added a dual benefit to the production of CBM, as carbon dioxide may be used to desorb methane from coal seams, sequestering the CO2. CBM is present in coal seams as a product of the coalification process. Methane gas is typically extracted by depressurizing the reservoir by removing water. This allows the gas to desorb from the coal matrix and flow through the cleat structure to a production well. In order to increase CBM production, more information is needed on the migration of methanethrough fractures and cleats. A better understanding of the replacement of methane by carbon dioxide in the coal seam is also needed to further understand this sequestration method. Laboratory experiments are underway to address these questions. Tests on core samples are currently performed under in-situ pressure to gain insight on processes occurring in CBM extraction and carbon dioxide sequestration. We use electrical resistivity and x-ray computed tomography (CT) scanning to determine saturation and spatial phase distribution. Flowrate, in conjunction with upstream and downstream pressure measurements, is used to determine sample permeabilty. Additionally, simultaneous measurements of seismic waves are performed to obtain P- and S-wave velocities as well as amplitudes of body waves as a function of methane and carbon dioxide state and saturation in the coal. Initial results will be presented showing the permeability structure of a coal sample, and seismic waveforms obtained during methane production by depressurization and during gaseous and liquid CO2 injection. Mass transfer limitations that may ultimately affect processes and parameter changes, were not observed in the short-duration tests. Technique refinement and additional testing using a variety of coal samples are still needed to provide a larger database of coal behaviors under conditions of interest. The results of laboratory studies on CBM can be used to design field experiments to monitor temporal changes during CBM production
Recommended from our members
Field test of INEEL tube-wave suppressor and LBNL borehole seismic system at Richmond Field Station, February 2001
Recommended from our members
Core evaluation of hydrologic and seismic properties of methane-bearing coals
In the last 10 years, coalbed methane (CBM) has transformed from a coal-mine hazard to a clean burning source of long term natural gas. The benefit of methane as an energy source in conjunction with vast amounts stored in coal basins has led to the development of an industry that produces CBM. Reducing the emission of green house gases to the atmosphere through carbon dioxide injection into coal has added a dual benefit to the production of CBM, as carbon dioxide may be used to desorb methane from coal seams, sequestering the CO2. CBM is present in coal seams as a product of the coalification process. Methane gas is typically extracted by depressurizing the reservoir by removing water. This allows the gas to desorb from the coal matrix and flow through the cleat structure to a production well. In order to increase CBM production, more information is needed on the migration of methanethrough fractures and cleats. A better understanding of the replacement of methane by carbon dioxide in the coal seam is also needed to further understand this sequestration method. Laboratory experiments are underway to address these questions. Tests on core samples are currently performed under in-situ pressure to gain insight on processes occurring in CBM extraction and carbon dioxide sequestration. We use electrical resistivity and x-ray computed tomography (CT) scanning to determine saturation and spatial phase distribution. Flowrate, in conjunction with upstream and downstream pressure measurements, is used to determine sample permeabilty. Additionally, simultaneous measurements of seismic waves are performed to obtain P- and S-wave velocities as well as amplitudes of body waves as a function of methane and carbon dioxide state and saturation in the coal. Initial results will be presented showing the permeability structure of a coal sample, and seismic waveforms obtained during methane production by depressurization and during gaseous and liquid CO2 injection. Mass transfer limitations that may ultimately affect processes and parameter changes, were not observed in the short-duration tests. Technique refinement and additional testing using a variety of coal samples are still needed to provide a larger database of coal behaviors under conditions of interest. The results of laboratory studies on CBM can be used to design field experiments to monitor temporal changes during CBM production