13 research outputs found
Uncertainty contributions to low-flow projections in Austria
The main objective of the paper is to understand the
contributions to the uncertainty in low-flow projections resulting from
hydrological model uncertainty and climate projection uncertainty. Model
uncertainty is quantified by different parameterisations of a conceptual
semi-distributed hydrologic model (TUWmodel) using 11 objective functions in
three different decades (1976–1986, 1987–1997, 1998–2008), which allows for disentangling the effect of the objective function-related uncertainty and temporal stability of model parameters. Climate projection uncertainty is
quantified by four future climate scenarios (ECHAM5-A1B, A2, B1 and
HADCM3-A1B) using a delta change approach. The approach is tested for 262
basins in Austria.
<br><br>
The results indicate that the seasonality of the low-flow regime is an
important factor affecting the performance of model calibration in the
reference period and the uncertainty of <i>Q</i><sub>95</sub> low-flow projections in the
future period. In Austria, the range of simulated <i>Q</i><sub>95</sub> in the reference
period is larger in basins with a summer low-flow regime than in basins with
a winter low-flow regime. The accuracy of simulated <i>Q</i><sub>95</sub> may result in a
range of up to 60 % depending on the decade used for calibration.
<br><br>
The low-flow projections of Q<sub>95</sub> show an increase of low flows in the
Alps, typically in the range of 10–30 % and a decrease in the
south-eastern part of Austria mostly in the range −5 to −20 % for the
climate change projected for the future period 2021–2050, relative the reference
period 1978–2007. The change in seasonality varies between scenarios, but
there is a tendency for earlier low flows in the northern Alps and later low
flows in eastern Austria. The total uncertainty of <i>Q</i><sub>95</sub> projections is
the largest in basins with a winter low-flow regime and, in some basins the
range of <i>Q</i><sub>95</sub> projections exceeds 60 %. In basins with summer low flows, the total uncertainty is mostly less than 20 %. The ANOVA
assessment of the relative contribution of the three main variance components
(i.e. climate scenario, decade used for model calibration and calibration
variant representing different objective function) to the low-flow projection
uncertainty shows that in basins with summer low flows climate scenarios
contribute more than 75 % to the total projection uncertainty. In basins
with a winter low-flow regime, the median contribution of climate scenario,
decade and objective function is 29, 13 and 13 %,
respectively. The implications of the uncertainties identified in this paper
for water resource management are discussed
Recommended from our members
Understanding the Distribution of Infant Attention: A Dynamical Systems Approach
Recommended from our members
Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of a Mathematics Problem: Their Measurement and Their Causal Interrelations
Recommended from our members
The Emergence of Stimulus-Response Associations from Neural Activation Fields: Dynamic Field Theory
Recommended from our members
Dynamic Field Theory: Conceptual Foundations and Applications in the Cognitive and Developmental Sciences
Recommended from our members
An Embodied Approach to Cognitive Systems: A Dynamic Neural Field Theory of Spatial Working Memory
Recommended from our members
Flexible Spatial Language Behaviors: Developing a New Dynamic Theoretical Framework
Recommended from our members