9 research outputs found

    Effects of a mental health carve-out on use, costs, and payers: A four-year study

    Full text link
    This study examines the effects of a mental health carve-out on a sample of continuously enrolled employees ( N = 1,943) over a four-year time frame (1990–1994). The article presents a health care services utilization model of the effect of the carve-out on outpatient mental health use, cost, and source of payment in the three years post implementation relative to the year prior to the carve-out model. In the first three years of the carve-out, the likelihood of employees seeking mental health care increased in significant part because of the carve-out. For the outpatient mental health services user, the carve-out was not associated with the level of mental health services received. The carve-out was significantly associated over time with a reduction in the patient's and employer's mental health costs. This effect was more pronounced in the second and third years of the carve-out. The article explores the policy implications of these and other findings.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45769/1/11414_2005_Article_BF02287299.pd

    The Economics of Integrated Depression Care: The University of Michigan Study

    Full text link
    A goal of the Robert Wood Johnson Depression and Primary Care Initiative at the University of Michigan is to create and implement the clinical care and financial systems necessary to enable links between primary care and mental health specialty depression care. This paper describes the economic issues related to resources required, the mechanisms to distribute those resources, and the support that must be garnered from stakeholders. By systematic measurement and application, we assess the cost, price and selected consequences of these efforts. The study illustrates the need for both centralized and distributed capacity and support for innovative models of care.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44096/1/10488_2005_Article_4231.pd

    Paying for Disease Management

    Full text link
    Disease Management (DM) first appeared in the United States in the early 1990s. Since then its incorporation into health plans has increased dramatically, yet proof of its effectiveness in terms of quality improvement and cost reduction remains to be seen. The following review provides an exploratory analysis of the basic principles of DM, its evolution and differences from traditional managed care, the ways in which programs are currently being used in the private and public sectors, and the challenges to determining a payment structure for incorporating DM into the current health insurance system. (Disease Management 2007;10:235–244)Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/63427/1/dis.2007.104646.pd

    Comparing Accuracy of Risk-Adjustment Methodologies Used in Economic Profiling of Physicians

    No full text
    This paper examines the relative accuracy of risk-adjustment methodologies used to profile primary care physician practice efficiency. Claims and membership data from an independent practice association health maintenance organization (HMO) were processed through risk-adjustment software of six different profiling methodologies. The Group R 2 statistic was used to measure, for simulated panels of HMO members, how closely each methodology's cost predictions matched the panel's actual costs. All but one methodology explained at least 50% of panel cost variance with panels as small as 25 patients. Group R 2 performance tended to be better when high-cost cases were included rather than excluded from the analyses

    Integration of Depression and Primary Care

    No full text
    Objective: Despite the prevailing consensus as to its value, the adoption of integrated care models is not widespread. Thus, the objective of this article it to examine the barriers to the adoption of depression and primary care models in the United States. Methods: A literature search focused on peer-reviewed journal literature in Medline and PsycInfo. The search strategy focused on barriers to integrated mental health care services in primary care, and was based on previously existing searches. The search included: MeSH terms combined with targeted keywords; iterative citation searches in Scopus; searches for grey literature (literature not traditionally indexed by commercial publishers) in Google and organization websites, examination of reference lists, and discussions with researchers. Findings: Integration of depression care and primary care faces multiple barriers. Patients and families face numerous barriers, linked inextricably to create challenges not easily remedied by any one party, including the following: vulnerable populations with special needs, patient and family factors, medical and mental health comorbidities, provider supply and culture, financing and costs, and organizational issues. Conclusions: An analysis of barriers impeding integration of depression and primary care presents information for future implementation of services

    Insurers' Competitive Strategy and Enrollment in Newly Offered Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs)

    No full text
    While early growth in preferred provider organizations (PPOs) coincided with growth of managed care generally, recent expansion has come primarily at the expense of other managed care plans. Little is known about the micro behavior underlying these trends. In 2005, University of Michigan employees were offered PPOs for the first time by vendors who also offered other plans. PPOs helped the offering vendors maintain or increase their total enrollment share. PPOs were most attractive to workers who previously had chosen less managed plans. Because PPOs drew few enrollees from health maintenance organizations (HMOs), there was little evidence of a backlash against managed care in the context of the University of Michigan employee group
    corecore