32 research outputs found

    An improved method for surface immobilisation of RNA: application to small Non-Coding RNA - mRNA pairing

    Get PDF
    Characterisation of RNA and its intermolecular interactions is increasing in importance as the inventory of known RNA functions continues to expand. RNA-RNA interactions are central to post-transcriptional gene regulation mechanisms in bacteria, and the interactions of bacterial small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) with their mRNA targets are the subject of much current research. The technology of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is an attractive approach to studying these interactions since it is highly sensitive, and allows interaction measurements to be recorded in real-time. Whilst a number of approaches exist to label RNAs for surface-immobilisation, the method documented here is simple, quick, efficient, and utilises the high-affinity streptavidin-biotin interaction. Specifically, we ligate a biotinylated nucleotide to the 3' end of RNA using T4 RNA ligase. Although this is a previously recognised approach, we have optimised the method by our discovery that the incorporation of four or more adenine nucleotides at the 3' end of the RNA (a poly-A-tail) is required in order to achieve high ligation efficiencies. We use this method within the context of investigating small non-coding RNA (sRNA)-mRNA interactions through the application of surface technologies, including quantitative SPR assays. We first focus on validating the method using the recently characterised Escherichia coli sRNA-mRNA pair, MicA-ompA, specifically demonstrating that the addition of the poly-A-tail to either RNA does not affect its subsequent binding interactions with partner molecules. We then apply this method to investigate the novel interactions of a Vibrio cholerae Qrr sRNA with partner mRNAs, hapR and vca0939; RNA-RNA pairings that are important in mediating pathogenic virulence. The calculated binding parameters allow insights to be drawn regarding sRNA-mRNA interaction mechanisms

    Hfq binding changes the structure of Escherichia coli small noncoding RNAs OxyS and RprA, which are involved in the riboregulation of rpoS

    Get PDF
    OxyS and RprA are two small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) that modulate the expression of rpoS, encoding an alternative sigma factor that activates transcription of multiple Escherichia coli stress-response genes. While RprA activates rpoS for translation, OxyS down-regulates the transcript. Crucially, the RNA binding protein Hfq is required for both sRNAs to function, although the specific role played by Hfq remains unclear. We have investigated RprA and OxyS interactions with Hfq using biochemical and biophysical approaches. In particular, we have obtained the molecular envelopes of the Hfq–sRNA complexes using small-angle scattering methods, which reveal key molecular details. These data indicate that Hfq does not substantially change shape upon complex formation, whereas the sRNAs do. We link the impact of Hfq binding, and the sRNA structural changes induced, to transcript stability with respect to RNase E degradation. In light of these findings, we discuss the role of Hfq in the opposing regulatory functions played by RprA and OxyS in rpoS regulation

    An Investigation into the Potential of Targeting Escherichia coli rne mRNA with Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) Gapmers as an Antibacterial Strategy

    Get PDF
    The increase in antibacterial resistance is a serious challenge for both the health and defence sectors and there is a need for both novel antibacterial targets and antibacterial strategies. RNA degradation and ribonucleases, such as the essential endoribonuclease RNase E, encoded by the rne gene, are emerging as potential antibacterial targets while antisense oligonucleotides may provide alternative antibacterial strategies. As rne mRNA has not been previously targeted using an antisense approach, we decided to explore using antisense oligonucleotides to target the translation initiation region of the Escherichia coli rne mRNA. Antisense oligonucleotides were rationally designed and were synthesised as locked nucleic acid (LNA) gapmers to enable inhibition of rne mRNA translation through two mechanisms. Either LNA gapmer binding could sterically block translation and/or LNA gapmer binding could facilitate RNase H-mediated cleavage of the rne mRNA. This may prove to be an advantage over the majority of previous antibacterial antisense oligonucleotide approaches which used oligonucleotide chemistries that restrict the mode-of-action of the antisense oligonucleotide to steric blocking of translation. Using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay, we demonstrate that the LNA gapmers bind to the translation initiation region of E. coli rne mRNA. We then use a cell-free transcription translation reporter assay to show that this binding is capable of inhibiting translation. Finally, in an in vitro RNase H cleavage assay, the LNA gapmers facilitate RNase H-mediated mRNA cleavage. Although the challenges of antisense oligonucleotide delivery remain to be addressed, overall, this work lays the foundations for the development of a novel antibacterial strategy targeting rne mRNA with antisense oligonucleotides

    DNA triple helix formation at homopurine sites interrupted by pyrimidine residues

    No full text
    Blocks of alternating G·TA and T·AT triplets can be stabilised when anchored to an adjacent block of eleven T·AT triplets. For example, the duplex A11(AT)6·(AT)6T11 can be recognised by the oligonucleotide T11(TG)6. These results have been extended to examine triplexes in which the alternating or anchoring regions have been made longer or shorter. An anchoring region of 11 X T·ATs allows formation of up to 11XT·AT/G·TA pairs, shorter stabilising tails generate less stable triplexes. The nature of the terminal triplet affects stability: T·AT is preferable to a G·TA. These triplexes are further stabilised by incorporating isolated numbers of C+·GC triplets in the anchoring region. For example, the triplex formed at AAAGAG(AT)6 is very stable in the absence of a triplex stabilising ligand, whereas a similar site without these 2 charged triplets does not form a triplex.The effects of relocating a single G·TA at different positions within a 17mer triplex have been studied using quantitative footprinting. These reveal greatest triplex stability when G·TA occupies the central position. Lower stability is observed with G·TA at either the 5' or 3' ends, with the 3'-end complex being marginally more stable. The preferred triplets for flanking G·TA or T·CG show that T·AT on either side of these triplets is best; a single C+vGC on either side gives intermediate stability, and poorest stability is seen with 2 flanking C+·GCs.Lastly, the charged base analogue propargylamino-dU (P) has been used to promote triplex formation at sites which otherwise require a stabilising ligand. The rank order of stability with P residues is TPTG &gt; TC+GP &gt; PC+GP &gt; PC+GT. Incorporating C+ and P residues within one complex is most effective when these triplets are separated by uncharged triplets. The results with this base analogue extend stable triplex formation to sites in which 25% of the target sequence contains pyrimidines.</p

    Triple helix formation at (AT)(n) adjacent to an oligopurine tract

    No full text
    We have used DNase I footprinting to investigate the recognition of (AT) n tracts in duplex DNA using GT-containing oligonucleotides designed to form alternating G.TA and T.AT triplets. Previous studies have shown that the formation of these complexes is facilitated by anchoring the triplex with a block of adjacent T.AT triplets, i.e. using T11(TG)6to recognize the target A11(AT)6. (AT)6T11. In the present study we have examined how the stability of these complexes is affected by the length of either the T.AT tract or the region of alternating G.TA and T.AT triplets, using oligonucleotides of type T x (TG) y to recognize the sequence A11(AT)11. We find that successful triplex formation at (AT)n (n = 3, 6 or 11) can be achieved with a stabilizing tail of 11xT.AT triplets. The affinity of the third strand increases with the length of the (GT) n tract, suggesting that the alternating G.TA and T.AT triplets are making a positive contribution to stability. These complexes are stabilized by the presence of manganese or a triplex-specific binding ligand. Shorter oligo-nucleotides, such as T7(TG)5, bind less tightly and require the addition of a triplex-binding ligand. T4(GT)5showed no binding under any conditions. Oligo-nucleotides forming a 3'-terminal T.AT are marginally more stable that those with a terminal G.TA. The stability of these complexes was further increased by replacing two of the T.AT triplets in the T n tail region with two C+.GC triplets

    Protein motion from non-specific to specific DNA by three-dimensional routes aided by supercoiling

    No full text
    DNA-binding proteins are generally thought to locate their target sites by first associating with the DNA at random and then translocating to the specific site by one-dimensional (1D) diffusion along the DNA. We report here that non-specific DNA conveys proteins to their target sites just as well when held near the target by catenation as when co-linear with the target. Hence, contrary to the prevalent view, proteins move from random to specific sites primarily by three-dimensional (3D) rather than 1D pathways, by multiple dissociation/re-association events within a single DNA molecule. We also uncover a role for DNA supercoiling in target-site location. Proteins find their sites more readily in supercoiled than in relaxed DNA, again indicating 3D rather than 1D routes

    DNA triple helix formation at (AT)n tracts

    No full text

    Secondary binding sites for triplex-forming oligonucleotides containing bulges, loops, and mismatches in the third strand

    No full text
    We have used DNase I footprinting to examine the binding of five different 17-mer oligonucleotides to a 53-base oligopurine tract containing four pyrimidine interruptions. Although all the expected triplexes formed with high affinity (Kd 10-50 nM), one oligonucleotide produced a footprint at a second site with about 20-fold lower affinity. We have explored the nature of this secondary binding site and suggest that it arises when each end of the third strand forms a 7-mer triplex with adjacent regions on the duplex, generating a contiguous 14-base triplex with a bulge in the center of the third strand oligonucleotide. This unusual binding mode was examined by use of oligonucleotides that were designed with the potential to form different length third-strand loops of various base composition. We find that triplexes containing single-base bulges are generally more stable than those with dinucleotide loops, though triplexes can be formed with loops of up to nine thymines, generating complexes with submicromolar dissociation constants. These structures are much more stable than those formed by adding two separate 7-mer oligonucleotides, which do not generate DNase I footprints, though a stable complex is generated when the two halves are covalently joined by a hexa(ethylene glycol) linker. MPE produces less clear footprints, presumably because this cleavage agent binds to triplex DNA, but confirms that the oligonucleotides can bind in unexpected places. These results suggest that extra care needs to be taken when designing long triplex-forming oligonucleotides so as to avoid triplex formation at shorter secondary sites
    corecore