33 research outputs found
Loss of microbial diversity and pathogen domination of the gut microbiota in critically ill patients
Among long-stay critically ill patients in the adult intensive care unit (ICU), there are often marked changes in the complexity of the gut microbiota. However, it remains unclear whether such patients might benefit from enhanced surveillance or from interventions targeting the gut microbiota or the pathogens therein. We therefore undertook a prospective observational study of 24 ICU patients, in which serial faecal samples were subjected to shotgun metagenomic sequencing, phylogenetic profiling and microbial genome analyses. Two-thirds of the patients experienced a marked drop in gut microbial diversity (to an inverse Simpson's index of <4) at some stage during their stay in the ICU, often accompanied by the absence or loss of potentially beneficial bacteria. Intravenous administration of the broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent meropenem was significantly associated with loss of gut microbial diversity, but the administration of other antibiotics, including piperacillin/tazobactam, failed to trigger statistically detectable changes in microbial diversity. In three-quarters of ICU patients, we documented episodes of gut domination by pathogenic strains, with evidence of cryptic nosocomial transmission of Enterococcus faecium. In some patients, we also saw an increase in the relative abundance of apparent commensal organisms in the gut microbiome, including the archaeal species Methanobrevibacter smithii. In conclusion, we have documented a dramatic absence of microbial diversity and pathogen domination of the gut microbiota in a high proportion of critically ill patients using shotgun metagenomics
EBF1-PDGFRB fusion in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL):genetic profile and clinical implications
Targeted sequencing identifies association between IL7R-JAK mutations and epigenetic modulators in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Anticoagulation therapy in children
Thromboembolic disease (TED) is increasingly recognized as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in tertiary pediatrics. Children younger than 1 year of age and teenage girls are at greatest risk of thromboembolism.
Although anticoagulation therapy is the treatment of choice for TED, the treatment strategy is often difficult, especially in children. Treatment relies largely on anticoagulation with heparin and warfarin. Recommendations for antithrombotic therapy in children have been loosely extrapolated from recommendations for adults; however, it is likely that optimal treatment of children with TED differs from adults because of important ontogenic features of hemostasis that affect both the pathophysiology of the thrombotic processes and the response to antithrombotic agents.
Until recently, the primary treatment for TED has been unfractionated heparin (UFH) in conjunction with warfarin. Warfarin, the most commonly used oral anticoagulant, acts through inhibition of the vitamin K-dependent transcarboxylation reactions that convert precursors of clotting factors into their active form. Appropriate use of UFH and warfarin requires close patient monitoring and dosage adjustments to ensure tolerability and efficacy. In recent years, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have become available as alternatives to UFH and warfarin, for both the prevention and treatment of TED. Potentially, LMWH have significant advantages. They have superior pharmacokinetics, which results in minimal laboratory monitoring, offering important benefits to children with poor venous access. Based on available data, LMWHs are at least as effective and well tolerated as UFH, and are more convenient. Although LMWHs are more expensive than UFH, the expense is likely to be offset by savings from a reduced hospital stay