Twenty-five years of Marxist Biblical criticism

In the context of a renewed interest in Marxism outside biblical studies, this article surveys and critiques the background and current status of a similar renewal in biblical studies. It begins with a consideration of the background of current studies in liberation, materialist and political theologies, and moves on to note the division between literary and social scientific uses of Marxist theories. While those who used Marxist literary methods were initially inspired by Terry Eagleton and Fredric Jameson, more recent work has begun to make use of a whole tradition of Marxist literary criticism largely ignored in biblical studies. More consistent work, however, has taken place in the social sciences in both Hebrew Bible and New Testament studies. In Hebrew Bible studies, debates focus on the question of mode of production, especially the domestic or household mode of production, while in New Testament studies, the concerns have been with reconstructing the context of the Jesus movement and, more recently, the Pauline correspondence. I close with a number of questions concerning the division into different areas of what is really a holistic approach to texts and history

Comparative genomics in the triticeae

International audienceThe genomes of grasses are very different in terms of size, ploidy level and chromosome number. Among them, the Triticeae species (wheat, barley, rye) have some of the largest and complex genomes. Comparative mapping studies between rice, maize, sorghum, barley and wheat have pioneered the field of plant comparative genomics a decade ago. They showed that the linear order (colinearity) of genetic markers and genes is very well conserved opening the way to accelerated map-based cloning and defining rice as a model for grasses. More recently, the availability of BAC libraries and large sets of genomic sequences including the completion of the rice genome have permitted micro-colinearity studies that revealed rearrangements between the grass genomes and provided some insights into mechanisms that have shaped their genome during evolution. This review summarizes a decade of comparative genomics Studies In grasses with a special emphasis on the wheat and barley genomes