Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with late-systolic and mid-diastolic cardiac phases using multi-slice computed tomography

Introduction: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) is an accurate tool for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, in order to reduce radiation dose, prospective acquisition protocols are currently used, in which the end-systole and end-diastole are not scanned. Our aim was to study the accuracy of the assessment of LVEF using fixed late-systolic and mid-diastolic cardiac phases compared with echocardiography. Methods: MSCT-derived LVEF was measured with off-line commercially available software packages, and compared with echocardiography-derived LVEF using the Simpson's method. LVEF was categorized as normal vs. abnormal (50% cut-off) and was also analyzed as a quantitative parameter. Bland-Altman plots and Pearson correlations were used for inter-technique comparisons. Results: 58 patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity of fixed-phase MSCT when compared with echocardiography for detection of LVEF ≤50% was 79% (95% CI = 65–89%) and 43% (10–82%). Misclassification was associated with older age (68 ± 12 vs. 54 ± 13 years, p < 0.01), faster heart rate (79 ± 14 vs. 68 ± 10 bpm, p = 0.01), and LV hypertrophy (86% vs. 52%, p = 0.03). The quantitative comparison revealed no correlation (r = 0.095, p = 0.478) and a significantly different LVEF (median[IQR], 57.0[50.5–63.1]% vs. 61.0[57.3–64.3]%, p = 0.03). The observed bias between the two methods was −3.7% with broad limits of agreement (±25.5%). Conclusions: Fixed-phase MSCT assessment using late-systole and mid-diastole agreed in defining normal and abnormal LVEF in 76% of patients when compared with echocardiography. Quantitation of LVEF by this method yielded significantly lower values of LVEF and showed no correlation. Thus, accurate quantitation of LVEF by MSCT requires the acquisition of end-systolic and end-diastolic phases

Exercise stress testing before and after successful multivessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Controversy exists regarding the diagnostic accuracy, optimal technique, and timing of exercise testing after percutaneous coronary intervention. The objectives of the present study were to analyze variables and the power of exercise testing to predict restenosis or a new lesion, 6 months after the procedure. Eight-four coronary multi-artery diseased patients with preserved ventricular function were studied (66 males, mean age of all patients: 59 ± 10 years). All underwent coronary angiography and exercise testing with the Bruce protocol, before and 6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention. The following parameters were measured: heart rate, blood pressure, rate-pressure product (heart rate x systolic blood pressure), presence of angina, maximal ST-segment depression, and exercise duration. On average, 2.33 lesions/patient were treated and restenosis or progression of disease occurred in 46 (55%) patients. Significant increases in systolic blood pressure (P = 0.022), rate-pressure product (P = 0.045) and exercise duration (P = 0.003) were detected after the procedure. Twenty-seven (32%) patients presented angina during the exercise test before the procedure and 16 (19%) after the procedure. The exercise test for the detection of restenosis or new lesion presented 61% sensitivity, 63% specificity, 62% accuracy, and 67 and 57% positive and negative predictive values, respectively. In patients without restenosis, the exercise duration after percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly longer (460 ± 154 vs 381 ± 145 s, P = 0.008). Only the exercise duration permitted us to identify patients with and without restenosis or a new lesion