Linfoma no hodgkin de células B grandes de la vía biliar simulando un tumor de Klatskin

La obstrucción de la vía biliar secundaria a un linfoma no hodgkin es extremadamente raro. Es por esto que presentamos el caso de una paciente femenina de 63 años que consulta por ictericia, coluria, acolia y astenia. Un laboratorio presentando un patrón colestásico y una ecografía con la vía biliar intra y extrahepática dilatadas llevaron a realizar una colangioresonancia de abdomen que evidenció una formación expansiva de limites mal definidos que comprometía el conducto hepático común asociado a estenosis del mismo. La sospecha inicial fue un tumor de klatskin y se llevó a cabo la toma de biopsia, cuyo resultado anatomopatológico informó infiltración de linfoma de células B de células grandes doble expresor como tumor primario de la vía biliar. Realizó tratamiento quimioterápico con esquema R CHOP (rituximab, ciclofosfamida, doxorrubicina, vincristina, prednisona) y entró en remisión. Por continuos episodios de colangitis se optó por realizar una hepático yeyuno anastomosis en Y de Roux con reconstrucción de la vía biliar. Actualmente continúa en remisión a 7 años del diagnóstico. El caso resalta la rareza del linfoma no hodgkin de células B grandes en la vía biliar, y destaca la importancia de la biopsia para un tratamiento eficaz que combina la quimioterapia para la enfermedad de base y la cirugía para las complicaciones obstructivas. La biopsia y el posterior análisis anatomopatológico es esencial para llegar al diagnóstico definitivo y poder establecer un tratamiento. La quimioterapia es el tratamiento adecuado siendo el R-CHOP el más utilizado en linfomas no hodgkin de células B grandes. La resección quirúrgica del tumor se reserva para complicaciones de la obstrucción biliar. Si bien es poco frecuente encontrar estos pacientes en la guardia es crucial tener en cuenta una causa neoplásica para poder arribar rápidamente a un diagnóstico definitivo y así poder establecer un tratamiento oportuno. En este artículo comentamos sobre el proceso diagnóstico y terapéutico de una paciente de 63 años que se estudia con una imagen de resonancia magnética nuclear ante sospecha de tumor de klatskin que resulta en un Linfoma no Hodgkin de células B grandes.

Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Pushing the Limits

The recent advent of more effective chemotherapy and the development of surgical procedures have expanded the pool of resectable patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH), associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and ultrasound-guided enhanced one-stage hepatectomy (e-OSH) are the surgical solutions proposed for these patients, but the range of indications for these procedures vary from institution to institution

Pushing the Limits of Surgical Resection in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: How Far Can We Go?

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and up to 50% of all patients diagnosed will develop metastatic disease. Management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has been constantly improving, aided by newer and more effective chemotherapy agents and the use of multidisciplinary teams. However, the only curative treatment remains surgical resection of the CRLM. Although survival for surgically resected patients has shown modest improvement, this is mostly because of the fact that what is constantly evolving is the indication for resection. Surgeons are constantly pushing the limits of what is considered resectable or not, thus enhancing and enlarging the pool of patients who can be potentially benefited and even cured with aggressive surgical procedures. There are a variety of procedures that have been developed, which range from procedures to stimulate hepatic growth, such as portal vein embolization, two-staged hepatectomy, or the association of both, to technically challenging procedures such as simultaneous approaches for synchronous metastasis, ex-vivo or in-situ perfusion with total vascular exclusion, or even liver transplant. This article reviewed the major breakthroughs in liver surgery for CRLM, showing how much has changed and what has been achieved in the field of CRLM

Effects of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery: an international prospective cohort study an international prospective cohort study

We aimed to determine the impact of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery during the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We performed an international prospective cohort study including patients undergoing elective surgery in October 2020. Isolation was defined as the period before surgery during which patients did not leave their house or receive visitors from outside their household. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, adjusted in multivariable models for measured confounders. Pre-defined sub-group analyses were performed for the primary outcome. A total of 96,454 patients from 114 countries were included and overall, 26,948 (27.9%) patients isolated before surgery. Postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded in 1947 (2.0%) patients of which 227 (11.7%) were associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients who isolated pre-operatively were older, had more respiratory comorbidities and were more commonly from areas of high SARS-CoV-2 incidence and high-income countries. Although the overall rates of postoperative pulmonary complications were similar in those that isolated and those that did not (2.1% vs 2.0%, respectively), isolation was associated with higher rates of postoperative pulmonary complications after adjustment (adjusted OR 1.20, 95%CI 1.05–1.36, p = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses revealed no further differences when patients were categorised by: pre-operative testing; use of COVID-19-free pathways; or community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. The rate of postoperative pulmonary complications increased with periods of isolation longer than 3 days, with an OR (95%CI) at 4–7 days or ≥ 8 days of 1.25 (1.04–1.48), p = 0.015 and 1.31 (1.11–1.55), p = 0.001, respectively. Isolation before elective surgery might be associated with a small but clinically important increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Longer periods of isolation showed no reduction in the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. These findings have significant implications for global provision of elective surgical care. We aimed to determine the impact of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery during the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We performed an international prospective cohort study including patients undergoing elective surgery in October 2020. Isolation was defined as the period before surgery during which patients did not leave their house or receive visitors from outside their household. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, adjusted in multivariable models for measured confounders. Pre-defined sub-group analyses were performed for the primary outcome. A total of 96,454 patients from 114 countries were included and overall, 26,948 (27.9%) patients isolated before surgery. Postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded in 1947 (2.0%) patients of which 227 (11.7%) were associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients who isolated pre-operatively were older, had more respiratory comorbidities and were more commonly from areas of high SARS-CoV-2 incidence and high-income countries. Although the overall rates of postoperative pulmonary complications were similar in those that isolated and those that did not (2.1% vs 2.0%, respectively), isolation was associated with higher rates of postoperative pulmonary complications after adjustment (adjusted OR 1.20, 95%CI 1.05–1.36, p = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses revealed no further differences when patients were categorised by: pre-operative testing; use of COVID-19-free pathways; or community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. The rate of postoperative pulmonary complications increased with periods of isolation longer than 3 days, with an OR (95%CI) at 4–7 days or ≥ 8 days of 1.25 (1.04–1.48), p = 0.015 and 1.31 (1.11–1.55), p = 0.001, respectively. Isolation before elective surgery might be associated with a small but clinically important increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Longer periods of isolation showed no reduction in the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. These findings have significant implications for global provision of elective surgical care