2,103 research outputs found

    Calculating conjugacy classes in Sylow p-subgroups of finite Chevalley groups of rank six and seven

    Get PDF
    Let G(q) be a finite Chevalley group, where q is a power of a good prime p, and let U(q) be a Sylow p-subgroup of G(q). Then a generalized version of a conjecture of Higman asserts that the number k(U(q)) of conjugacy classes in U(q) is given by a polynomial in q with integer coefficients. In an earlier paper, the first and the third authors developed an algorithm to calculate the values of k(U(q)). By implementing it into a computer program using GAP, they were able to calculate k(U(q)) for G of rank at most 5, thereby proving that for these cases k(U(q)) is given by a polynomial in q. In this paper we present some refinements and improvements of the algorithm that allow us to calculate the values of k(U(q)) for finite Chevalley groups of rank six and seven, except E_7. We observe that k(U(q)) is a polynomial, so that the generalized Higman conjecture holds for these groups. Moreover, if we write k(U(q)) as a polynomial in q-1, then the coefficients are non-negative. Under the assumption that k(U(q)) is a polynomial in q-1, we also give an explicit formula for the coefficients of k(U(q)) of degrees zero, one and two.Comment: 16 page

    On the coadjoint orbits of maximal unipotent subgroups of reductive groups

    Full text link
    Let G be a simple algebraic group defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0 or a good prime for G. Let U be a maximal unipotent subgroup of G and \u its Lie algebra. We prove the separability of orbit maps and the connectedness of centralizers for the coadjoint action of U on (certain quotients of) the dual \u* of \u. This leads to a method to give a parametrization of the coadjoint orbits in terms of so-called minimal representatives which form a disjoint union of quasi-affine varieties. Moreover, we obtain an algorithm to explicitly calculate this parametrization which has been used for G of rank at most 8, except E8. When G is defined and split over the field of q elements, for q the power of a good prime for G, this algorithmic parametrization is used to calculate the number k(U(q), \u*(q)) of coadjoint orbits of U(q) on \u*(q). Since k(U(q), \u*(q)) coincides with the number k(U(q)) of conjugacy classes in U(q), these calculations can be viewed as an extension of the results obtained in our earlier paper. In each case considered here there is a polynomial h(t) with integer coefficients such that for every such q we have k(U(q)) = h(q).Comment: 14 pages; v2 23 pages; to appear in Transformation Group

    The United States Great Britain and the Status of Thailand (Siam), 1940-1946

    Get PDF
    This paper traces the changes in the attitudes and policies of the United States towards the Southeast Asian country of Thailand during the Second World War. From a position of indifference the United States assumed an active role in the emergence of Thailand as a sovereign nation at the conclusion of the war, encouraging pro-American factions and opposing a traditional power of the area, Great Britain. The emphasis of the paper is on the different attitudes held by Britain and the United States and the efforts to reconcile them. The British expected recompense by the Thais for allying themselves with the Japanese; even so the discussions were usually within the framework of the Americans\u27 post-war vision that placed great reliance on the free will of the Thai people. When Britain appeared to be attempting to impose its own authority over the Thais, the United States acted firmly to thwart this and insist that its own world-view prevailed, thus assuring continuing American influence in the area

    President's annual message

    Get PDF

    New IAHR Council elected for 2015-2017

    Get PDF

    How To Reach This Broken World

    Get PDF
    ...Every single person here this morning is in mission. You are not in remission. You are in mission. There isn\u27t one person here this morning who is not in mission. We are called into mission. We are not in a career. We are in a calling. A holy calling from the Creator God this morning. A holy calling. And every one of us here this morning is gifted. And our gifting and our calling are to be received, unwrapped and given back to the one who gave it to us
    • …
    corecore