Economic evaluation of complete revascularization versus stress echocardiography-guided revascularization in the STEACS with multivessel disease

[Resumen] Introducción y objetivos. Los estudios económicos pueden ayudar a tomar decisiones en el tratamiento de la enfermedad multivaso en el infarto. Se planteó realizar una evaluación económica del ensayo clínico CROSS-AMI (Complete Revascularization or Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Multivessel Disease and ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction). Métodos. Se realizó un análisis de comparación de costes económicos de las estrategias (revascularización angiográfica completa [RCom] y revascularización selectiva guiada por isquemia en ecocardiograma de estrés [RSel]) comparadas en el ensayo clínico CROSS-AMI (N = 306), derivados de la hospitalización inicial y del primer año de seguimiento, según las tarifas oficiales vigentes en nuestro sistema de salud. Resultados. El coste de la hospitalización inicial resultó superior en el grupo de RCom que en la rama de RSel (19.657,9 ± 6.236,8 frente a 14.038,7 ± 4.958,5 euros; p < 0,001). No hubo diferencias entre ambos grupos en el coste del primer año de seguimiento (RCom, 2.423,5 ± 4.568,0 euros; Rsel, 2.653,9 ± 5.709,1 euros; p = 0,697). El coste total fue 22.081,3 ± 7.505,6 euros en la rama de RCom y 16.692,6 ± 7.669,9 euros en la rama de RSel (p < 0,001). Conclusiones. En el ensayo clínico CROSS-AMI, el sobrecoste inicial de la RCom frente a la RSel no se vio compensado por un ahorro significativo en el seguimiento. La RSel parece ser una estrategia más eficiente que la RCom para los pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo con elevación del segmento ST y enfermedad multivaso tratados mediante angioplastia emergente.[Abstract] Introduction and objectives. Economic studies may help decision making in the management of multivessel disease in the setting of myocardial infarction. We sought to perform an economic evaluation of CROSS-AMI (Complete Revascularization or Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Multivessel Disease and ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction) randomized clinical trial. Methods. We performed a cost minimization analysis for the strategies (complete angiographic revascularization [ComR] and selective stress echocardiography–guided revascularization [SelR]) compared in the CROSS-AMI clinical trial (N = 306), attributable the initial hospitalization and readmissions during the first year of follow-up, using current rates for health services provided by our health system. Results. The index hospitalization costs were higher in the ComR group than in SelR arm (19 657.9 ± 6236.8 € vs 14 038.7 ± 4958.5 €; P < .001). There were no differences in the costs of the first year of follow-up rehospitalizations between both groups for (ComR 2423.5 ± 4568.0 vs SelR 2653.9 ± 5709.1; P = .697). Total cost was 22 081.3 ± 7505.6 for the ComR arm and 16 692.6 ± 7669.9 for the SelR group (P < .001). Conclusions. In the CROSS-AMI trial, the initial extra economic costs of the ComR versus SelR were not offset by significant savings during follow-up. SelR seems to be more efficient than ComR in patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease treated by emergent angioplasty

Syncope in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: clinical features and outcomes

[Abstract] Background: We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, underlying causes and outcomes of syncope in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Methods: The clinical profile and underlying causes of syncopal episodes were reviewed in a cohort of 128 patients with ATTR-CM enrolled from January 2018 to June 2020 in a prospective multicentre registry in 7 hospitals of Galicia (Spain). After enrollment, patients were followed during a median period of 520 days. The effect of syncope on all-cause mortality was assessed by means of multivariate Cox´s regression. Results: Thirty (23.4%) patients had a history of previous syncope as a clinical antecedent before being enrolled in the prospective phase of the registry, and 4 (3.1%) experienced a first episode of syncope thereafter. The estimated incidence density rate of syncope during the prospective follow-up period after registry enrollment was 71.9 episodes per 1000 patients-year (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 32.8-111.1). The estimated overall prevalence of syncope was 26.6% (95% CI 18.9%-34.2%). Cardiac arrhythmias (n = 11, 32.3%), structural diseases of the heart or great vessels (n = 5, 14.7%), a neurally mediated reflex (n = 6, 17.6%), and orthostatic hypotension (n = 4, 11.8%) were identified as probable underlying causes of syncope; in 8 (23.6%) patients, syncope remained unexplained. Patients with syncope had increased non-adjusted all-cause mortality than patients without it (univariate hazard-ratio 3.37; 95% CI 1.43-7.94). When other independent predictors of survival were added to the survival model, this association was no longer statistically significant (multivariate hazard-ratio 1.81, 95% CI 0.67-4.84). Conclusions: Syncope is frequent in patients with ATTR-CM. This study could not demonstrate an independent association between syncope and mortality in those individuals.Abbreviations: ATTR-CM: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy; CI: Confidence Interval; HF: Heart Failure; HR: Hazard Ratio; IQR: Interquartile rank; LVEF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; NTproBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; SD: Standard Deviation; 99mTc-DPD: technetium-99m-labeled 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid