5 research outputs found
Multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19)
The SARS-CoV-2 virus spreading across the world has led to surges of COVID-19 illness, hospitalizations, and
death. The complex and multifaceted pathophysiology of life-threatening COVID-19 illness including viral mediated
organ damage, cytokine storm, and thrombosis warrants early interventions to address all components of the devastating
illness. In countries where therapeutic nihilism is prevalent, patients endure escalating symptoms and without
early treatment can succumb to delayed in-hospital
care and death. Prompt early initiation of sequenced multidrug
therapy (SMDT) is a widely and currently available
solution to stem the tide of hospitalizations and death. A
multipronged therapeutic approach includes 1) adjuvant
nutraceuticals, 2) combination intracellular anti-infective
therapy, 3) inhaled/oral corticosteroids, 4) antiplatelet
agents/anticoagulants, 5) supportive care including supplemental
oxygen, monitoring, and telemedicine. Randomized
trials of individual, novel oral therapies have not
delivered tools for physicians to combat the pandemic in
practice. No single therapeutic option thus far has been
entirely effective and therefore a combination is required
at this time. An urgent immediate pivot from single drug to
SMDT regimens should be employed as a critical strategy
to deal with the large numbers of acute COVID-19 patients
with the aim of reducing the intensity and duration
of symptoms and avoiding hospitalization and death
Unfavorable hydroxychloroquine COVID-19 research associated with authors having a history of political party donations
We explored the degree to which political bias in medicine and study authors could explain the stark variation in Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)/Chloroquine (CQ) study favorability in the US compared to the rest of the world. COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 preprint and published papers between January 1, 2020-July 26, 2020 with Hydroxychloroquine and/or Chloroquine; 267 met study criteria, 68 from the US. A control subset was selected. HCQ/CQ study result favorability (favorable, unfavorable, or neutral) was noted. First and last main authors of each US study were entered into FollowTheMoney.org Website, extracting any history of political party donation. Of all US studies (68 total), 39/68 (57.4%) were unfavorable, with only 7/68 (10.3%) of US studies yielding favorable results-compared to 199 non-US studies, 66/199 (33.2%) unfavorable, 69/199 (34.7%) favorable, and 64/199 (32.2%) neutral. Studies with at least one US main author were 20.4% (SE 0.053, P \u3c 0.05) more likely to report unfavorable results than non-US studies. US Studies with at least one main author donating to any political party were 25.6% (SE 0.085, P \u3c 0.01) more likely to have unfavorable results. US studies with at least one author donating to the Democratic party were 20.4% (SE 0.045, P \u3c 0.05) more likely to have unfavorable results. US authors were more likely to publish studies with medically harmful conclusions than non-US authors. Cardiology-specific HCQ/CQ studies were 44.2% more likely to yield harmful conclusions (P \u3c 0.01). Inaccurate propagation of HCQ/CQ cardiac adverse effects with individual scientific author political bias has contributed to unfavorable US HCQ/CQ publication patterns and political polarization of the medications