Minimally Important Difference of the Absolute and Functional Claudication Distance in Patients with Intermittent Claudication

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: Disease severity and treatment outcomes in patients with intermittent claudication (IC) are commonly assessed using walking distance measured with a standardized treadmill test. It is unclear what improvement or deterioration in walking distance constitutes a meaningful, clinically relevant, change from the patients' perspective. The purpose of the present study was to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) for the absolute claudication distance (ACD) and functional claudication distance (FCD) in patients with IC. METHOD: The MIDs were estimated using an anchor based approach with a previously defined clinical anchor derived from scores of the walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ) in a similar IC population. Baseline and 3 month follow up data on WIQ scores and walking distances (ACD and FCD) were used from 202 patients receiving supervised exercise therapy from the 2010 EXITPAD randomized controlled trial. The external WIQ anchor was used to form three distinct categories: patients with "clinically relevant improvement," "clinically relevant deterioration," and "no clinically relevant change." The MIDs for improvement and deterioration were defined by the upper and lower limits of the 95% confidence interval of the mean change in ACD and FCD, for the group of IC patients that remained unchanged according to the WIQ anchor. RESULTS: For the estimation of the MID of the ACD and FCD, 102 and 101 patients were included, respectively. The MID for the ACD was 305 m for improvement, and 147 m for deterioration. The MID for the FCD was 250 m for improvement, and 120 m for deterioration. CONCLUSION: The MIDs for the treadmill measured ACD and FCD can be used to interpret the clinical relevance of changes in walking distances after supervised exercise therapy and may be used in both research and individual care

Gender differences following supervised exercise therapy in patients with intermittent claudication

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease is equal in men and women. However, women seem to suffer more from the burden of disease. Current studies on gender-related outcomes following supervised exercise therapy (SET) for intermittent claudication (IC) yield conflicting results. METHODS: A follow-up analysis was performed on data from the 2010 Exercise Therapy in Peripheral Arterial Disease (EXITPAD) study, a multicenter randomized controlled trial including IC patients receiving SET or a walking advice. The SET program was supervised by physiotherapists and included interval-based treadmill walking approximating maximal pain combined with activities such as cycling and rowing. Patients usually started with three 30-minute sessions a week. Training frequency was adapted during the following year on the basis of individual needs. The primary outcome was gender differences regarding the change in absolute claudication distance (ACD) after SET. ACD was defined as the number of meters that a patient had covered just before he or she was forced to stop walking because of intolerable pain. Secondary outcomes were gender differences in change of functional walking distance, quality of life, and walking (dis)ability after SET. Walking distances were obtained by standardized treadmill testing according to the Gardner-Skinner protocol. Quality of life was measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and walking (dis)ability was determined by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ). Measurements were performed at baseline and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Only patients who met the 12-month follow-up measure were included in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 113 men and 56 women were available for analysis. At baseline, groups were similar in terms of clinical characteristics and ACD walking distances (men, 250 meters; women, 270 meters; P = .45). ACD improved for both sexes. However, ACD increase was significantly lower for women than for men during the first 3 months of SET (Delta 280 meters for men vs Delta 220 meters for women; P = .04). Moreover, absolute walking distance was significantly shorter for women compared with men after 1 year (565 meters vs 660 meters; P = .032). Women also reported less on several WIQ subdomains, although total WIQ score was similar (0.69 for men vs 0.61 for women; P = .592). No differences in quality of life after SET were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Women with IC benefit less during the first 3 months of SET and have lower absolute walking distances after 12 months of follow-up compared with men. More research is needed to determine whether gender-based IC treatment strategies are required

[Infantile myofibroma: a neonate with a swelling on the arm]

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: An infantile myofibroma (IM) is a benign congenital soft-tissue tumour. IM is found in 1 per 150,000 live births, making it the most common fibrous tumour of infancy and early childhood. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report on a full-term neonate presenting with an irregular tumour mass on the right lower-arm. The mass measured 5 cm in diameter, with surface ulceration. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed characteristics that could be consistent with malignancy. On the basis of a biopsy and subsequent polymerase chain reaction we were able to make a diagnosis of 'benign infantile myofibroma'. We chose for conservative treatment in the expectation that the tumour would regress spontaneously. CONCLUSION: Infantile myofibroma should be considered when a newborn presents with an atypical mass. It is difficult to make a diagnosis on the basis of the clinical characteristicsalone due to the heterogenous presentation. A definitive diagnosis can only be made following histological investigation