3 research outputs found
Essays on the antecedents, outcomes and multiplexity of informal innovation networks in an industrial cluster
Innovation scholars have been studying social networks for a long time. The
two major research concerns have been to understand the origin of social
structures and their consequences on innovation. Considerable attention has
been given to the analysis of network structures that favour innovation. This
stream of research focuses on the structural properties of networks and their
effects on innovation. On the flip side, a large number of studies have
investigated the underlying mechanisms and driving forces behind these
network structures. This stream of research focuses on the individual, dyadic
and structural-level drivers of network formation.
Despite these numerous contributions, there are at least three issues in
innovation-related network studies that require further investigation. First,
multiplexity has received little attention in innovation studies. Notably, scholars
have overlooked the formation of multiplex innovation networks. Thus, there is
a need to analyse the individual, dyadic and structural level drivers of the
formation of multiplex innovation networks. Second, network research is
dominated by studies conducted in the western context, and there is a lack of
contributions from developing countries. Scholars have also highlighted this
issue in recent studies. Third, innovation scholars have mainly focused on
undirected networks and formal collaborations, and little attention has been
paid to studying directed informal networks. Thus, this thesis aims to fill these
research gaps and investigates the antecedents, outcomes and multiplexity of
directed and informal innovation networks. The thesis constitutes three papers.
The first paper, âProximity and its impact on the formation of product and
process innovation networksâ, contributes to the stream of literature
investigating the dyadic-level antecedents of the formation of multiple
networks. It analyses the role of multi-dimensional proximity (a dyadic-level
driver) in the formation of product and process innovation networks. Using
multiple regression quadratic assignment procedure (MRQAP), a social
network analysis technique, I study these networks among seventy-three firms
in the Lahore textile cluster in Pakistan. I find a significant influence of four
dimensions of proximity on the process of network formation. Notably, the
impact of social, cognitive and organisational dimensions of proximity is found
to be stronger for process innovation network than for product innovation
network. Contrarily, geographic proximity plays a more critical role in network
formation for product innovation than process innovation.
The second paper, âFormation and dynamics of product and process
innovation networks: evidence from a textile cluster in Pakistanâ, also
contributes to individual-level and network-level drivers of multiplex network
formation. It investigates the influence of individual and relational attributes of
actors, as well as endogenous network mechanisms on the formation of
product and process innovation networks. Using exponential random graph
models (ERGM), this study examines the effect of absorptive capacity and
innovative capacity as individual-level attributes; business relations as a
dyadic-level factor; and popularity, activity, reciprocity, multi-connectivity and
transitivity as network-level characteristics, on the formation of product and
process innovation networks. The study finds that individual attributes,
relational attributes and endogenous network mechanisms show a significant
influence on the formation of both innovations networks.
The third paper, âInfluence of a firmâs network position on its innovation
outcome in a mature industrial clusterâ, employs a social network perspective
to investigate the influence of firmsâ structural and relational embeddedness
on their innovation outcome in a directed network in an industrial cluster. From
the structural embeddedness perspective, the paper argues that a central
position in an informal advice network does not bring equal innovation benefits
to advice-seekers and advice-givers. Notably, in a mature industrial cluster, it
is expected that the number of advice giving ties (popularity) positively
influences the innovation outcome of firms, whereas the number of advice-seeking
ties (activity) negatively affects the firmsâ innovation. From the
relational embeddedness perspective, the paper investigates the effect of
strong and weak ties on the innovation outcome of firms in a mature industrial
cluster. It expects a positive relationship between firmsâ innovation output and
strong ties, and a negative relationship between weak ties and the innovation
output of firms. The findings suggest that activity has a significant negative
impact on the innovation outcome of firms, while popularity shows a significant
positive impact on the innovative outcome of firms. Strong ties show a positive
and significant impact on innovation, while weak ties demonstrate a significant
adverse effect on innovation. The study also finds that absorptive capacity fully
mediates the relationship between advice-giving ties and innovation, and
partially mediates the relationship between advice-seeking ties and innovation.
This work has implications for cluster policymakers as well as research and
development managers
Exploring emergent leadership in agile teams: Network dynamics, roles, and skills at the individual level
Purpose: Leadership research has traditionally focused on formal leadership; however, leaders may emerge in informal settings in self-managed teams, and little is known about who emergent leaders are and what their characteristics are. Drawing on a multi-method approach, the study investigates emergent leadersâ behaviors, roles, skills, and leadership styles. Method: We first identify emergent leaders using social network analysis (SNA) and aggregation approaches. Second, we investigate emergent leadersâ characteristics using interviews with forty agile team members in five organizations. Findings: Results indicate different roles of emergent leaders (i.e., coach, liaisons), leadership styles (i.e., supportive), skills (i.e., culturally intelligent, strategist), and influencing factors (i.e., personality, technical knowledge, social circle). Originality: We contribute by identifying emergent leaders through multiple identification methods (i.e., network analysis, aggregation), and then through identifying their various characteristics, we contribute to leadership literature as well as idiosyncrasy-credit theory. We also add to agile-leadership theory, showing that multiple informal leaders may emerge within agile teams. Finally, our findings have practical implications for self-managed teams, informal group settings, organizational change professionals, and organizations with horizontal structures