Israeli pediatricians’ confidence level in diagnosing and treating children with skin disorders: a cross-sectional questionnaire pilot study

BackgroundPediatricians daily see large numbers of patients with skin disorders. However, they encounter limited guidance as a result of a marked deficiency in pediatric dermatologists. Hence, reevaluation of training opportunities during pediatric residency has become essential. Our aim was to evaluate the confidence level of pediatric residents and specialists in diagnosing and treating skin disorders in children and to determine career and training-related characteristics that influence it.MethodsConducted as a cross-sectional study, we administered a questionnaire to 171 pediatricians across Israel. We assessed respondents’ self-efficacy about their ability to diagnose and treat skin disorders and collected data regarding their previous dermatology training and preferred training methods.Results77.8% of respondents reported below or average self-efficacy scores in diagnosing and managing children with skin disorders. Older age (>40 years old; OR = 5.51, p = 0.019), treating a higher number of patients with skin disorders (OR = 2.96, p = 0.032), and having any training in dermatology, either during medical school or residency (OR = 7.16, p = 0.031, OR = 11.14, p = 0.003 respectively), were all significant parameters involved in pediatricians reporting high self-efficacy in skin disorder management.ConclusionMost pediatric residents and pediatricians have average or below-average confidence in managing pediatric skin disorders. We suggest incorporating dermatology rotations during pediatric residency to improve young pediatricians’ self-efficacy in managing skin disorders and ultimately help pediatricians provide better care for patients presenting with dermatological conditions. These findings can ultimately help refine a pilot program in dermatology that might be implemented during pediatric residency

Determination of elevated eosinophil to lymphocyte ratio, eosinophil to neutrophil ratio, eosinophil to monocyte ratio and its association with severe vitiligo: A retrospective cohort study.

BackgroundHematological markers such as eosinophil-to-lymphocyte (ELR), eosinophil-to-neutrophil (ENR), and eosinophil-to-monocyte (EMR) ratios may be used in the assessment of skin diseases. However, the relationship with vitiligo remains unclear.ObjectivesWe investigated ELR, ENR, and EMR in vitiligo patients and the association with severe vitiligo.MethodsThis study included patients of all ages diagnosed with vitiligo between 2005-2020. ELR, EMR, and ENR were calculated from complete blood counts within 30 days of the first recorded vitiligo diagnosis and 12-18 months before the vitiligo diagnosis. We evaluated the associations between ELR, ENR, and EMR and vitiligo.Results9,826 vitiligo patients (8,398 adults and 1,428 children) and 8,951 age and sex-matched controls were included in this study. We found that ELR, EMR, and ENR were higher in children than in adults. Patients with vitiligo had higher ENR and EMR than their matched controls. Patients with severe vitiligo had higher ELR, ENR, and EMR compared to patients with mild vitiligo. Patients with increased ENR and EMR 12-18 months before the vitiligo diagnosis had a higher chance of having severe vitiligo (ENR: OR = 7.40, pConclusionELR, ENR, and EMR may be used in the assessment and prognosis of vitiligo, especially in severe cases

Clinical, demographic, and laboratory characteristics of severe vitiligo patients compared to healthy controls.

Clinical, demographic, and laboratory characteristics of severe vitiligo patients compared to healthy controls.</p

Demographics of patients with mild versus severe vitiligo.

Demographics of patients with mild versus severe vitiligo.</p

Youden indexes for severe vitiligo.

BackgroundHematological markers such as eosinophil-to-lymphocyte (ELR), eosinophil-to-neutrophil (ENR), and eosinophil-to-monocyte (EMR) ratios may be used in the assessment of skin diseases. However, the relationship with vitiligo remains unclear.ObjectivesWe investigated ELR, ENR, and EMR in vitiligo patients and the association with severe vitiligo.MethodsThis study included patients of all ages diagnosed with vitiligo between 2005–2020. ELR, EMR, and ENR were calculated from complete blood counts within 30 days of the first recorded vitiligo diagnosis and 12–18 months before the vitiligo diagnosis. We evaluated the associations between ELR, ENR, and EMR and vitiligo.Results9,826 vitiligo patients (8,398 adults and 1,428 children) and 8,951 age and sex-matched controls were included in this study. We found that ELR, EMR, and ENR were higher in children than in adults. Patients with vitiligo had higher ENR and EMR than their matched controls. Patients with severe vitiligo had higher ELR, ENR, and EMR compared to patients with mild vitiligo. Patients with increased ENR and EMR 12–18 months before the vitiligo diagnosis had a higher chance of having severe vitiligo (ENR: OR = 7.40, pConclusionELR, ENR, and EMR may be used in the assessment and prognosis of vitiligo, especially in severe cases.</div

Hematological parameters of mild vitiligo patients compared to healthy controls.

Hematological parameters of mild vitiligo patients compared to healthy controls.</p

Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with chronic vitligo, stratified by age group.

Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with chronic vitligo, stratified by age group.</p

Hematologic ratios of patients with chronic vitligo, stratified by age group.

Hematologic ratios of patients with chronic vitligo, stratified by age group.</p

Laboratory characteristics of patients with vitiligo, stratified by severity group.

Laboratory characteristics of patients with vitiligo, stratified by severity group.</p

Regression for severe vitiligo.

BackgroundHematological markers such as eosinophil-to-lymphocyte (ELR), eosinophil-to-neutrophil (ENR), and eosinophil-to-monocyte (EMR) ratios may be used in the assessment of skin diseases. However, the relationship with vitiligo remains unclear.ObjectivesWe investigated ELR, ENR, and EMR in vitiligo patients and the association with severe vitiligo.MethodsThis study included patients of all ages diagnosed with vitiligo between 2005–2020. ELR, EMR, and ENR were calculated from complete blood counts within 30 days of the first recorded vitiligo diagnosis and 12–18 months before the vitiligo diagnosis. We evaluated the associations between ELR, ENR, and EMR and vitiligo.Results9,826 vitiligo patients (8,398 adults and 1,428 children) and 8,951 age and sex-matched controls were included in this study. We found that ELR, EMR, and ENR were higher in children than in adults. Patients with vitiligo had higher ENR and EMR than their matched controls. Patients with severe vitiligo had higher ELR, ENR, and EMR compared to patients with mild vitiligo. Patients with increased ENR and EMR 12–18 months before the vitiligo diagnosis had a higher chance of having severe vitiligo (ENR: OR = 7.40, pConclusionELR, ENR, and EMR may be used in the assessment and prognosis of vitiligo, especially in severe cases.</div