Internal Medicine Residents Reject “Longer and Gentler” Training

BACKGROUND: Increasing complexity of medical care, coupled with limits on resident work hours, has prompted consideration of extending Internal Medicine training. It is unclear whether further hour reductions and extension of training beyond the current duration of 3 years would be accepted by trainees. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine if further work-hour reductions and extension of training would be accepted by trainees and whether resident burnout affects their opinions. DESIGN: A postal survey was sent to all 143 Internal Medicine residents at the University of Colorado School of Medicine in May 2004. MEASUREMENTS: The survey contained questions related to opinions on work-hour limits using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Burnout was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, organized into three subscales: emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and personal accomplishment, with burnout defined as high EE or DP. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent (106/143) of residents returned the survey. The vast majority (84%) of residents disagreed or strongly disagreed with extending training to 4 or 5 years. Burnout residents were less averse to extending training (strongly agree or agree, 18.9% vs 4.3%, P = .04). The majority of residents (68.9%) disagreed or strongly disagreed with establishing a 60-hour/week limit. Residents who met the criteria for burnout were more likely to agree that a 60-hour limit would be better than an 80-hour limit (strongly agree or agree, 22% vs 8%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In this program, most Internal Medicine residents are strongly opposed to extending their training to 4 or 5 years and would prefer the current 80 hours/week cap. A longer, less intense pace of Internal Medicine training seems to be less attractive in the eyes of current trainees

Pseudo-discordance mimicking low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis

Background: While the combination of a small aortic valve area (AVA) and low mean gradient is frequently labeled ‘low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS)’, there are two potential causes for this finding: underestimation of mean gradient and underestimation of AVA. Methods: In order to investigate the prevalence and causes of discordant echocardiographic findings in symptomatic patients with AS and normal left ventricular (LV) function, we evaluated 72 symptomatic patients with AS and normal LV function by comparing Doppler, invasive, computed tomography (CT) LV outflow tract (LVOT) area, and calcium score (CaSc). Results: Thirty-six patients had discordant echocardiographic findings (mean gradient < 40 mmHg, AV area ≤ 1 cm2). Of those, 19 had discordant invasive measurements (true discordant [TD]) and 17 concordant (false discordant [FD]): In 12 of the FD the mean gradient was > 30 mmHg; technical pitfalls were found in 10 patients (no reliable right parasternal Doppler in 6). LVOT area by echocardiography or CT could not differentiate between concordants and discordants nor between TD and FD (p = NS). CaSc was similar in concordants and FD (p = 0.3), and it was higher in true concordants than in TD (p = 0.005). CaSc positive predictive value for the correct diagnosis of severe AS was 95% for concordants and 93% for discordants. Conclusions: Discordant echocardiographic findings are commonly found in patients with symptomatic AS. Underestimation of the true mean gradient due to technical difficulties is an important cause of these discrepant findings. LVOT area by echocardiography or CT cannot differentiate between TD and FD. In the absence of a reliable and compete multi-window Doppler evaluation, patients should undergo CaSc assessment

Studies in Islamic history and institutions

Yet Islam is not the religion of the arabs alone, it is a universal, a world religion. As is well known, the Arabs constitute a minority among the muslim. The largest single group Muslims is formed by people speaking Indo-European languages : iranians, Afghans and the Muslims of Pakistan and India, altogether about 180 million, over twice as many as the Arab people.ix, 379 p.; 24 c

Studies in Islamic history and institutions

Yet Islam is not the religion of the arabs alone, it is a universal, a world religion. As is well known, the Arabs constitute a minority among the muslim. The largest single group Muslims is formed by people speaking Indo-European languages : iranians, Afghans and the Muslims of Pakistan and India, altogether about 180 million, over twice as many as the Arab people.ix, 379 p.; 24 c

Studies in Islamic history and institutions

Yet Islam is not the religion of the arabs alone, it is a universal, a world religion. As is well known, the Arabs constitute a minority among the muslim. The largest single group Muslims is formed by people speaking Indo-European languages : iranians, Afghans and the Muslims of Pakistan and India, altogether about 180 million, over twice as many as the Arab people.ix, 379 p.; 24 c