The glucose-sensing transcription factor ChREBP is targeted by proline hydroxylation

Abstract Cellular energy demands are met by uptake and metabolism of nutrients like glucose. The principal transcriptional regulator for adapting glycolytic flux and downstream pathways like de novo lipogenesis to glucose availability in many cell types is carbohydrate response element–binding protein (ChREBP). ChREBP is activated by glucose metabolites and post-translational modifications, inducing nuclear accumulation and regulation of target genes. Here we report that ChREBP is modified by proline hydroxylation at several residues. Proline hydroxylation targets both ectopically expressed ChREBP in cells and endogenous ChREBP in mouse liver. Functionally, we found that specific hydroxylated prolines were dispensable for protein stability but required for the adequate activation of ChREBP upon exposure to high glucose. Accordingly, ChREBP target gene expression was rescued by re-expressing WT but not ChREBP that lacks hydroxylated prolines in ChREBP-deleted hepatocytes. Thus, proline hydroxylation of ChREBP is a novel post-translational modification that may allow for therapeutic interference in metabolic diseases

Structural Variations in Protein Superfamilies: Actin and Tubulin

Structures of homologous proteins are usually conserved during evolution, as are critical active site residues. This is the case for actin and tubulin, the two most important cytoskeleton proteins in eukaryotes. Actins and their related proteins (Arps) constitute a large superfamily whereas the tubulin family has fewer members. Unaligned sequences of these two protein families were analysed by searching for short groups of family-specific amino acid residues, that we call motifs, and by counting the number of residues from one motif to the next. For each sequence, the set of motif-to-motif residue counts forms a subfamily-specific pattern (landmark pattern) allowing actin and tubulin superfamily members to be identified and sorted into subfamilies. The differences between patterns of individual subfamilies are due to inserts and deletions (indels). Inserts appear to have arisen at an early stage in eukaryote evolution as suggested by the small but consistent kingdom-dependent differences found within many Arp subfamilies and in gamma-tubulins. Inserts tend to be in surface loops where they can influence subfamily-specific function without disturbing the core structure of the protein. The relatively few indels found for tubulins have similar positions to established results, whereas we find many previously unreported indel positions and lengths for the metazoan Arps