7 research outputs found
Development of the Method of Simultaneous Quantitative Determination of Loratadine and Auxuilary Substances in the Combined Syrup "Loratadin+"
Aim. The aim of the present study was to develop a method for the simultaneous determination of loratadine and auxiliary substances - methyl parahydroxybenzoate and propyl parahydroxybenzoate in the combined "Loratadine+" syrup in the presence of a bupleurum aurus grass extract.Materials and methods. Liquid chromatography separation was performed using a Shimadzu Nexera X2 LC-30AD HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan) composed of a quaternary pump, an on-line degasser, a column temperature controller, the SIL-30AC autosampler (Shimadzu, Japan); the CTO-20AC thermostat (Shimadzu, Japan) as well as the SPD-M20A diode array detector (DAD).Results and discussion. Identification of the main component and impurities in the combined syrup was performed by determining the retention times of peaks of loratadine, methyl parahydroxybenzoate and propyl parahydroxybenzoate on the chromatogram of the test solution, obtained by quantifying them, which coincided with the retention times of the corresponding peaks on the chromatogram of the reference solution.When developing a quantitative determination method, it was found that using the gradient mode, the best separation between the compounds was observed, the separation coefficient between the peaks of methyl parahydroxybenzoate and the peaks closest to it became more than 2.5, in the case of propyl parahydroxybenzoate this index was more than 3.To confirm the correctness of the proposed method, validation studies were carried out in accordance with the requirements of SPHU. It was established that the uncertainty of sample preparation is 1.5 % for loratadine, 1.47 % for methyl parahydroxybenzoate, and 1.53 % for propyl parahydroxybenzoate, which does not exceed the acceptance criteria. The specificity of the technique was confirmed by comparing the chromatograms of the reference solution, the test solution and the chromatogram of the blank solution. Requirements for the linearity of the method were performed over the entire range of concentrations for loratadine and both excipients. The correlation coefficients were 0.9999, 0.9999 and 0.9995, respectively. The correctness of the technique was carried out according to two criteria - practical and statistical insignificance, which were determined in the course of experimental studies. The results of the assessment of intralaboratory precision showed that the obtained values of the confidence interval of the average result to the criteria of acceptability. Based on the results of the determination of robustness, it was found that for optimal chromatographic conditions, a freshly prepared reference solution can be used within 24 hours.Conclusions. A method was developed for the simultaneous quantitative determination of loratadine and auxiliary substances - methyl parahydroxybenzoate and propyl parahydroxybenzoate in the syrup of "Loratadine+". The conditions that allow to correctly determining all the components in the presence of a bupleurum aurus grass extract were determined. The correctness of the methodology is confirmed by validation studie
Π ΠΠ·ΡΠΠ±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΠΊΠ ΠΊΠΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΠ³Π ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ― Π±ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ₯ ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΠΊΡΠ Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΊΠ Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ Π ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ«
Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π²ΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π°. ΠΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π³ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅Π²ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ β ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ° Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π² ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ Π² Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΏΠ° Π² ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈ Ρ Π»ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΠΠΠ₯. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ² ΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ Π°Π±ΡΠΎΡΠ±ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π² Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ Π°Π»ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ Ρ
Π»ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΄Π° Π² ΠΊΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΌΠΌΡ ΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ Ρ Π»ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡ
ΠΈΠΌ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΠΠΠ₯ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Ρ, ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΡΡ Π² ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅. ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡ ΡΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ·Π²Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΏΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ Π°Π»ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ Ρ
Π»ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΄Π° Π² ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΊΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ Π²ΠΎΠ»Π½Ρ 412 Π½ΠΌ. ΠΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ Ξ΄noise=0,25 % max Ξ΄=0,51 %. ΠΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡ ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΡΠΌΠΌΡ ΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠΈΠ½ Π² Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΏΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ° Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π² ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ ΠΎΡ 80 % Π΄ΠΎ 120 %, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ (r) ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ 0,9999 Β³ 0,9981; ΡΠ³Π»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ (b) ΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π½ 0,9947, ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ»Π΅Π½ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ (Π°) β 0,52 Β£ 1,60. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ, ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°Π»Π° ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ²: D % = 0,37 β€ 2,60 ΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΈ d = 0,01.ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΠΠΠ₯ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ Π½Π°Π΄Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ² ΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π² ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠΌΠΌΠ΅ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΌΠΌΡ ΡΠ»Π°Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠΈΠ½ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ Π² Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΏΠ° Π² ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Π³ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π»ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ½
A population-based study of inferior vena cava filters in patients with acute venous thromboembolism
BACKGROUND: Our study objective was to describe the frequency, indications, and outcomes after inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in a population-based sample of residents of the Worcester, Massachusetts, metropolitan area who had been diagnosed as having acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 1999, 2001, and 2003.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of inpatient and outpatient medical records was conducted. Recorded indication(s) for IVC filter placement was determined among a subset of cases from 3 Worcester tertiary care hospitals. Three thrombosis specialists assessed the appropriateness of IVC filter placement.
RESULTS: Of 1547 greater Worcester residents with validated acute VTE and without a prior IVC filter, 203 (13.1%) had an IVC filter placed after acute VTE. Patients with an IVC filter were older, had more comorbidities, and had a higher mortality rate during 3 years of follow-up. There was unanimous agreement by panel members that the use of an IVC filter was appropriate in 51% of cases and inappropriate in 26% of cases, with no consensus in the remaining 23%.
CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based study, IVC filters were frequently used in the treatment of patients with acute VTE. Placement was deemed to be appropriate in approximately 50% of the patients but was not appropriate or debatable in the remaining cases. Given the increasing use of IVC filters, prospective studies are clearly needed to better define the indications for, and efficacy of, IVC filter placement
Isolated calf deep vein thrombosis in the community setting: the Worcester Venous Thromboembolism study
The prevalence of isolated calf deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the community setting is relatively unexplored. Confusion remains with regards to its management and contemporary natural history. The purpose of this investigation was to describe the number of cases of calf DVT in the community, use of early management strategies, and rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and major bleeding. The medical records of residents of the Worcester (MA) metropolitan area with ICD-9 codes consistent with potential VTE during 4 study years (1999/2001/2003/2005) were validated by trained nurses. Patient demographic/clinical characteristics, treatment practices, and outcomes were evaluated. Isolated calf DVT was diagnosed in 166 (11.1%) of 1,495 patients with lower extremity DVT. Patients with calf DVT were less likely to be discharged on anticoagulants or with an IVC filter than patients with proximal DVT (84.1 vs. 92.3%). The rates of VTE recurrence and pulmonary embolism did not differ significantly between patients with calf DVT and proximal DVT at 6 months (11.0 vs. 8.7%, 2.6 vs. 1.8%, respectively). Patients with calf DVT had higher adjusted risk of early (14-day) VTE recurrence/extension (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.01-5.44). Patients with calf DVT had lower rates of major bleeding at 6 months compared to patients with proximal DVT (5.2 vs. 9.3%, P = 0.04). Rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding following calf DVT in the community are much higher than in randomized clinical trials of patients with proximal or calf DVT. Further study of management strategies for isolated calf DVT is needed