Clinical whole-exome sequencing reveals a common pathogenic variant in patients with CoQ10 deficiency: An underdiagnosed cause of mitochondriopathy

[Background]: Primary CoQ deficiency occurs because of the defective biosynthesis of coenzyme Q, one of the key components of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Patients with this disease present with a myriad of non-specific symptoms and signs, posing a diagnostic challenge. Whole-exome sequencing is vital in the diagnosis of these cases.[Case]: Three unrelated cases presenting as either encephalopathy or cardiomyopathy have been diagnosed to harbor a common pathogenic variant c.370G > A in COQ4. COQ4 encodes a key structural component for stabilizing the multienzymatic CoQ biosynthesis complex. This variant is detected only among East and South Asian populations.[Conclusions]: Based on the population data and our case series, COQ4-related mitochondriopathy is likely an underrecognized condition. We recommend including the COQ4 c.370G > A variant as a part of the screening process for mitochondriopathy in Chinese populations.This work was supported by the S.K. Yee Medical Foundation, Hong Kong

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Cantonese Cumber

Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is a malignant development arising from the epithelium ofthe nasopharynx (Lee AWM, 1997) and is typically associated with infection by theEpstein Barr Virus (EBV) (Old et al., 1966).  EBV can also cause infectiousmononucleosis (Klein et al., 1969) and Burkitt’s lymphoma (Epstein, Achong, & Barr,1964; zur Hausen et al., 1970).

Effects of once-weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular effects of adding once-weekly treatment with exenatide to usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes are unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes, with or without previous cardiovascular disease, to receive subcutaneous injections of extended-release exenatide at a dose of 2 mg or matching placebo once weekly. The primary composite outcome was the first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The coprimary hypotheses were that exenatide, administered once weekly, would be noninferior to placebo with respect to safety and superior to placebo with respect to efficacy. RESULTS: In all, 14,752 patients (of whom 10,782 [73.1%] had previous cardiovascular disease) were followed for a median of 3.2 years (interquartile range, 2.2 to 4.4). A primary composite outcome event occurred in 839 of 7356 patients (11.4%; 3.7 events per 100 person-years) in the exenatide group and in 905 of 7396 patients (12.2%; 4.0 events per 100 person-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.00), with the intention-to-treat analysis indicating that exenatide, administered once weekly, was noninferior to placebo with respect to safety (P<0.001 for noninferiority) but was not superior to placebo with respect to efficacy (P=0.06 for superiority). The rates of death from cardiovascular causes, fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, and the incidence of acute pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, medullary thyroid carcinoma, and serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 2 diabetes with or without previous cardiovascular disease, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between patients who received exenatide and those who received placebo