Remote ischemic preconditioning in patients with intermittent claudication

INTRODUÇÃO: Pré-condicionamento isquêmico remoto (PCIR) é o fenômeno pelo qual curtos períodos de isquemia sub-letal sobre um órgão ou tecido, intercalados com reperfusão do mesmo, conferem a outros órgãos ou tecidos distantes deste, um aumento na capacidade da resistir a episódios subsequentes de isquemia, a qual os mesmos possam ser expostos. Com base nesse fato, testamos a hipótese de que o pré-condicionamento isquêmico remoto em pacientes portadores de claudicação intermitente de membros inferiores poderia aumentar a capacidade de deambulação desses pacientes, extrapolando o conceito do PCIR de aumento da capacidade de preservação da integridade celular frente à isquemia, para a manutenção da função celular, tornando a célula mais apta ao trabalho em situações de privação de oxigênio, geradas pela restrição do fluxo sanguíneo, como ocorre nos pacientes com claudicação intermitente de membros inferiores, durante o exercício. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar se o PCIR aumenta a distância de início de claudicação e/ou a distância total de claudicação em pacientes com doença arterial obstrutiva periférica. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 52 pacientes ambulatoriais que apresentavam queixa de claudicação intermitente dos membros inferiores, associada a um pulso arterial ausente ou reduzido no membro sintomático e/ou um índice tornozelo-braço <0,90. Estes pacientes foram randomizados em três grupos (A, B e C). Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a dois testes de caminhada em esteira de acordo com o protocolo de Gardner. O grupo A fez o primeiro teste de esteira sem o pré-condicionamento isquêmico remoto e, após 7 dias, foi submetido a um novo teste de esteira, agora precedido pelo pré-condicionamento isquêmico remoto. O grupo B foi submetido ao pré-condicionamento isquêmico remoto antes do primeiro teste de esteira e, após 7 dias, realizou novo teste de esteira, agora sem o pré-condicionamento isquêmico remoto. Já no Grupo C (grupo controle), ambos os testes de esteira foram realizados sem pré-condicionamento isquêmico remoto, também com 7 dias de intervalo. RESULTADOS: Os grupos A e C mostraram um aumento na distância de início de claudicação, no segundo teste, em comparação com o primeiro teste. O grupo A teve um aumento estatisticamente significativo, em relação ao grupo C (grupo controle). Com relação à distância total de claudicação, todos os grupos (A, B e C), mostraram um aumento estatisticamente significativo a favor do segundo teste, porém não foi observada diferença entre os grupos (A, B e C). CONCLUSÕES: O pré-condicionamento isquêmico remoto aumentou a distância inicial de claudicação em pacientes com claudicação intermitente, no entanto, ele não afetou a distância total de claudicação dos pacientes portadores de claudicação intermitente de membros inferioresINTRODUCTION: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a phenomenon in which a short period of sub-lethal ischemia in one organ protects against subsequent bouts of ischemia in another organ. Extrapolating the RIPC concept of increasing the preservation of cell integrity capability against ischemia, for the maintenance of cellular function, making the cell more able to work in oxygen deprivation generated by the restriction of blood flow, as occurs in patients with intermittent claudication of the lower limbs during exercise, we hypothesized that RIPC in patients with intermittent claudication would increase muscle tissue resistance to ischemia, thereby resulting in an increased ability to walk. OBJECTIVES: To test this hypothesis, we performed gait tests in patients with claudication with and without prior RIPC and then compared the initial claudication distance (ICD) and the total walking distance (TWD). METHODS: In a claudication clinic, 52 ambulatory patients who presented with complaints of intermittent claudication in the lower limbs associated with an absent or reduced arterial pulse in the symptomatic limb and/or an ankle-brachial index < 0.90 were recruited for this study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups (A, B and C). All of the patients underwent two tests on a treadmill according to the Gardener protocol. Group A was tested first without RIPC. Group A was subjected to RIPC prior to the second treadmill test. Group B was subjected to RIPC prior to the first treadmill test and then was subjected to a treadmill test without RIPC. In Group C (control group), both treadmill tests were performed without RIPC. The first and second tests were conducted seven days apart. Brazilian Clinical Trials: RBR-7TF6TM. RESULTS: Group A and C showed an increase in the initial claudication distance in the second test compared to the first test. Group A had a statistically significant increase, compared with C group (control group). With respect to total claudication distance, all the groups (A, B and C) showed a statistically significant increase in favor of the second test, but there was no difference between groups (A, B and C). CONCLUSIONS: RIPC increased the initial claudication distance in patients with intermittent claudication; however, RIPC did not affect the total walking distance of the patient

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Patients With Intermittent Claudication and its Correlation With the Segment of Arterial Obstruction

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Intermittent claudication reflects the presence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of the MetS in claudicants and its correlation with age, gender, localization of arterial obstruction, and symptomatic coronary disease. Patients (n = 170) with intermittent claudication were studied. The mean age was 65 years (33-89). Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in 98 patients (57.6%). The mean age of patients with MetS was 63.5 years compared with 67.0 years for patients without MetS (P = .027). Considering patients aged >= 65 years, MetS was present in 46 (48.9%) individuals and in 52 (68.4%) patients younger than 65 years (P = .011). Metabolic syndrome must be actively searched for in claudicant patients

Validation of a Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH)

Abstract Background: The Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH) questionnaire has been proposed to evaluate walking impairment in patients with intermittent claudication (IC), presenting satisfactory psychometric properties. However, a Brazilian Portuguese version of the questionnaire is unavailable, limiting its application in Brazilian patients. Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties of a translated Brazilian Portuguese version of the WELCH in Brazilian patients with IC. Methods: Eighty-four patients with IC participated in the study. After translation and back-translation, carried out by two independent translators, the concurrent validity of the WELCH was analyzed by correlating the questionnaire scores with the walking capacity assessed with the Gardner treadmill test. To determine the reliability of the WELCH, internal consistency and test–retest reliability with a seven-day interval between the two questionnaire applications were calculated. Results: There were significant correlations between the WELCH score and the claudication onset distance (r = 0.64, p = 0.01) and total walking distance (r = 0.61, p = 0.01). The internal consistency was 0.84 and the intraclass correlation coefficient between questionnaire evaluations was 0.84. There were no differences in WELCH scores between the two questionnaire applications. Conclusion: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the WELCH presents adequate validity and reliability indicators, which support its application to Brazilian patients with IC

Reproducibility of anaerobic and pain thresholds in male patients with intermittent claudication

Purpose: Maximal and submaximal parameters assessed during treadmill tests are used to prescribe exercise training and assess exercise-induced adaptations in patients with intermittent claudication (IC). Although reproducibility of maximal parameters is well documented, the reproducibility of submaximal is not clear. The aim of this study was to identify the reproducibility (reliability and agreement) of heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (O2) measured at the anaerobic (AT) and the pain (PT) thresholds assessed during a maximal test in patients with IC. Methods: Twenty male patients with IC underwent 2 cardiopulmonary treadmill tests to maximal pain. The HR and O2 at the AT and PT were identified, and differences between repeat tests were compared. Reliability was determined by intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC). Agreement was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable difference (SDD), and limits of agreement (LOA). Results: The O2 at AT and PT exhibited moderate reliability and moderate/good agreement (ICC = 0.73 and 0.70; CV = 9.6% and 11.1%, respectively). The HR at the AT and PT exhibited high reliability and good agreement (ICC = 0.87 and 0.92; SEM = 3.9 and 3.2 bpm; SDD = 10.8 and 8.8 bpm, respectively). The LOA for O2 at AT and PT were <=20% and for HR <=11 bpm. Conclusions: The O2 and HR measured at the AT and PT were moderately to highly reproducible in male patients with IC. The HR and O2 at AT and PT may be used to establish training intensity and evaluate training effectiveness for these patients in clinical practice and research