325 research outputs found

    Methods for detecting spatial clustering of economic activities using micro-geographic data

    Get PDF
    This PhD thesis consists of three self-contained but related essays on the topic of empirical assessment of spatial clusters of economic activities within a micro-geographic framework. The tendency of economic activities to be concentrated in a specific territory is well recognized, starting at least from the seminal studies by Alfred Marshall (Marshall, 1920). This spatial behaviour is not fortuitous; by concentrating in some areas firms enjoy a number of advantages, which then have implications for local economic growth and regional disparities and, as a consequence, are object of study in the fields of economics, geography and policy making. It has been recognized, however, that a major obstacle to further comprehension of the agglomeration phenomena of firms is the lack of a method to properly measure their spatial concentration. The most traditional measures employed by economists, indeed, are not completely reliable. Their most relevant methodological limit lies in the use of regional aggregates, which are built by referring to arbitrary definitions of the spatial units (such as provinces, regions or municipalities) and hence introduce a statistical bias arising from the chosen notion of space. This methodological problem can be tackled by using a continuous approach to space, where data are collected at the maximum level of spatial disaggregation, i.e. each firm is identified by its geographic coordinates, say (x, y), and spatial concentration is detected by referring to the distribution of distances amongst economic activities. The main purpose of the dissertation is to contribute to the development of this kind of continuous space-based measures of spatial clustering. The scientific context and motivation are outlined in depth in the first three chapters. Then the first essay introduces the space–time K-function empirical tool, proposed in spatial statistical literature, into economic literature in order to detect the geographic concentration of industries while controlling for the temporal dynamics that characterize the localization processes of firms. The proposed methodology allows to explore the possibility that the spatial and temporal phenomena, producing the observed pattern of firms at a given moment of time, interact to provide space–time clustering. The presence of significant space–time interaction implies that an observed pattern cannot be explained only by static factors but that we should also consider the dynamic evolution of the spatial concentration phenomenon. Indeed, for example, new firm settlements may display no spatial concentration if we look separately at each moment of time and yet they may present a remarkable agglomeration if we look at the overall resulting spatial distribution after a certain time period. In general, without knowing the temporal evolution of the phenomenon under study it is not possible to identify the mechanism generating its spatial structure. As a matter of fact, different underlying space–time processes can lead to resulting spatial patterns which look the same. The methodology is illustrated with an application to the analysis of the spatial distribution of the ICT industries in Rome (Italy), in the long period 1920–2005. The problem of disentangling spatial heterogeneity and spatial dependence phenomena when detecting for spatial clusters of firms is the topic of the second essay, “Measuring industrial agglomeration with inhomogeneous K-function: the case of ICT firms in Milan (Italy)”. Spatial clusters of economic activities can be the result of two distinct broad classes of phenomena: spatial heterogeneity and spatial dependence. The former arises when exogenous factors lead firms to locate in certain specific geographical zones. For instance, firms may group together in certain areas in order to exploit favourable local conditions, such as the presence of useful infrastructures, the proximity to the communication routes or more convenient local taxation systems. The phenomenon of spatial dependence, which is often of direct scientific interest, occurs instead when the presence of an economic activity in a given area attracts other firms to locate nearby. For instance, the presence of firms with a leading role encouraging the settlement of firms producing intermediate goods in the same area or the incidence of knowledge spillovers driving industrial agglomerations. This essay suggests a parametric approach based on the inhomogeneous K-function that allows to assess the endogenous effects of interaction among economic agents, namely spatial dependence, while adjusting for the exogenous effects of the characteristics of the study area, namely spatial heterogeneity. The approach is also illustrated with a case study on the spatial distribution of the ICT manufacturing industry in Milan (Italy). The third paper is titled “Weighting Ripley’s K-function to account for the firm dimension in the analysis of spatial concentration”. In the methodological context of the continuous space-based measures of spatial clustering, firms are identified as dimensionless points distributed in a planar space. In realistic circumstances, however, firms are generally far from being dimensionless and are conversely characterized by different dimension in terms of the number of employees, the product, the capital and so on. This implies that a high level of spatial concentration can occur, for example, because many small firms cluster in space, or few large firms (in the limit just one firm) cluster in space. A proper test for the presence of spatial clusters of firms should thus consider the impact of the firm dimension on industrial agglomeration. For this respect, the third essay develops a methodology based on an extension of the K-function considering firm size as a weight attached to each of the points representing the firms’ locations

    Methods for detecting spatial clustering of economic activities using micro-geographic data

    Get PDF
    This PhD thesis consists of three self-contained but related essays on the topic of empirical assessment of spatial clusters of economic activities within a micro-geographic framework. The tendency of economic activities to be concentrated in a specific territory is well recognized, starting at least from the seminal studies by Alfred Marshall (Marshall, 1920). This spatial behaviour is not fortuitous; by concentrating in some areas firms enjoy a number of advantages, which then have implications for local economic growth and regional disparities and, as a consequence, are object of study in the fields of economics, geography and policy making. It has been recognized, however, that a major obstacle to further comprehension of the agglomeration phenomena of firms is the lack of a method to properly measure their spatial concentration. The most traditional measures employed by economists, indeed, are not completely reliable. Their most relevant methodological limit lies in the use of regional aggregates, which are built by referring to arbitrary definitions of the spatial units (such as provinces, regions or municipalities) and hence introduce a statistical bias arising from the chosen notion of space. This methodological problem can be tackled by using a continuous approach to space, where data are collected at the maximum level of spatial disaggregation, i.e. each firm is identified by its geographic coordinates, say (x, y), and spatial concentration is detected by referring to the distribution of distances amongst economic activities. The main purpose of the dissertation is to contribute to the development of this kind of continuous space-based measures of spatial clustering. The scientific context and motivation are outlined in depth in the first three chapters. Then the first essay introduces the space–time K-function empirical tool, proposed in spatial statistical literature, into economic literature in order to detect the geographic concentration of industries while controlling for the temporal dynamics that characterize the localization processes of firms. The proposed methodology allows to explore the possibility that the spatial and temporal phenomena, producing the observed pattern of firms at a given moment of time, interact to provide space–time clustering. The presence of significant space–time interaction implies that an observed pattern cannot be explained only by static factors but that we should also consider the dynamic evolution of the spatial concentration phenomenon. Indeed, for example, new firm settlements may display no spatial concentration if we look separately at each moment of time and yet they may present a remarkable agglomeration if we look at the overall resulting spatial distribution after a certain time period. In general, without knowing the temporal evolution of the phenomenon under study it is not possible to identify the mechanism generating its spatial structure. As a matter of fact, different underlying space–time processes can lead to resulting spatial patterns which look the same. The methodology is illustrated with an application to the analysis of the spatial distribution of the ICT industries in Rome (Italy), in the long period 1920–2005. The problem of disentangling spatial heterogeneity and spatial dependence phenomena when detecting for spatial clusters of firms is the topic of the second essay, “Measuring industrial agglomeration with inhomogeneous K-function: the case of ICT firms in Milan (Italy)”. Spatial clusters of economic activities can be the result of two distinct broad classes of phenomena: spatial heterogeneity and spatial dependence. The former arises when exogenous factors lead firms to locate in certain specific geographical zones. For instance, firms may group together in certain areas in order to exploit favourable local conditions, such as the presence of useful infrastructures, the proximity to the communication routes or more convenient local taxation systems. The phenomenon of spatial dependence, which is often of direct scientific interest, occurs instead when the presence of an economic activity in a given area attracts other firms to locate nearby. For instance, the presence of firms with a leading role encouraging the settlement of firms producing intermediate goods in the same area or the incidence of knowledge spillovers driving industrial agglomerations. This essay suggests a parametric approach based on the inhomogeneous K-function that allows to assess the endogenous effects of interaction among economic agents, namely spatial dependence, while adjusting for the exogenous effects of the characteristics of the study area, namely spatial heterogeneity. The approach is also illustrated with a case study on the spatial distribution of the ICT manufacturing industry in Milan (Italy). The third paper is titled “Weighting Ripley’s K-function to account for the firm dimension in the analysis of spatial concentration”. In the methodological context of the continuous space-based measures of spatial clustering, firms are identified as dimensionless points distributed in a planar space. In realistic circumstances, however, firms are generally far from being dimensionless and are conversely characterized by different dimension in terms of the number of employees, the product, the capital and so on. This implies that a high level of spatial concentration can occur, for example, because many small firms cluster in space, or few large firms (in the limit just one firm) cluster in space. A proper test for the presence of spatial clusters of firms should thus consider the impact of the firm dimension on industrial agglomeration. For this respect, the third essay develops a methodology based on an extension of the K-function considering firm size as a weight attached to each of the points representing the firms’ locations

    Weighting Ripley’s K-function to account for the firm dimension in the analysis of spatial concentration

    Get PDF
    The spatial concentration of firms has long been a central issue in economics both under the theoretical and the applied point of view due mainly to the important policy implications. A popular approach to its measurement, which does not suffer from the problem of the arbitrariness of the regional boundaries, makes use of micro data and looks at the firms as if they were dimensionless points distributed in the economic space. However in practical circumstances the points (firms) observed in the economic space are far from being dimensionless and are conversely characterized by different dimension in terms of the number of employees, the product, the capital and so on. In the literature, the works that originally introduce such an approach (e.g. Arbia and Espa, 1996; Marcon and Puech, 2003) disregard the aspect of the different firm dimension and ignore the fact that a high degree of spatial concentration may result from both the case of many small points clustering in definite portions of space and from only few large points clustering together (e.g. few large firms). We refer to this phenomena as to clustering of firms and clustering of economic activities. The present paper aims at tackling this problem by adapting the popular Kfunction (Ripley, 1977) to account for the point dimension using the framework of marked point process theory (Penttinen, 2006)Agglomeration, Marked point processes, Spatial clusters, Spatial econometrics

    Measuring industrial agglomeration with inhomogeneous K-function: the case of ICT firms in Milan (Italy)

    Get PDF
    Why do industrial clusters occur in space? Is it because industries need to stay close together to interact or, conversely, because they concentrate in certain portions of space to exploit favourable conditions like public incentives, proximity to communication networks, to big population concentrations or to reduce transport costs? This is a fundamental question and the attempt to answer to it using empirical data is a challenging statistical task. In economic geography scientists refer to this dichotomy using the two categories of spatial interaction and spatial reaction to common factors. In economics we can refer to a distinction between exogenous causes and endogenous effects. In spatial econometrics and statistics we use the terms of spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. A series of recent papers introduced explorative methods to analyses the spatial patterns of firms using micro data and characterizing each firm by its spatial coordinates. In such a setting a spatial distribution of firms is seen as a point pattern and an industrial cluster as the phenomenon of extra-concentration of one industry with respect to the concentration of a benchmarking spatial distribution. Often the benchmarking distribution is that of the whole economy on the ground that exogenous factors affect in the same way all branches. Using such an approach a positive (or negative) spatial dependence between firms is detected when the pattern of a specific sector is more aggregated (or more dispersed) than the one of the whole economy. In this paper we suggest a parametric approach to the analysis of spatial heterogeneity, based on the socalled inhomogeneous K-function (Baddeley et al., 2000). We present an empirical application of the method to the spatial distribution of high-tech industries in Milan (Italy) in 2001. We consider the economic space to be non homogenous, we estimate the pattern of inhomogeneity and we use it to separate spatial heterogeneity from spatial dependence.

    Non-native children speech recognition through transfer learning

    Full text link
    This work deals with non-native children's speech and investigates both multi-task and transfer learning approaches to adapt a multi-language Deep Neural Network (DNN) to speakers, specifically children, learning a foreign language. The application scenario is characterized by young students learning English and German and reading sentences in these second-languages, as well as in their mother language. The paper analyzes and discusses techniques for training effective DNN-based acoustic models starting from children native speech and performing adaptation with limited non-native audio material. A multi-lingual model is adopted as baseline, where a common phonetic lexicon, defined in terms of the units of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), is shared across the three languages at hand (Italian, German and English); DNN adaptation methods based on transfer learning are evaluated on significant non-native evaluation sets. Results show that the resulting non-native models allow a significant improvement with respect to a mono-lingual system adapted to speakers of the target language

    Clusters of firms in space and time

    Get PDF
    The use of the K-functions (Ripley, 1977) has become recently popular in the analysis of the spatial pattern of firms. It was first introduced in the economic literature by Arbia and Espa (1996) and then popularized by Marcon and Puech (2003), Quah and Simpson (2003), Duranton and Overman (2005) and Arbia et al. (2008). In particular in Arbia et al. (2008) we used Ripley’s K-functions as instruments to study the inter-sectoral co-agglomeration pattern of firms in a single moment of time. All this researches have followed a static approach, disregarding the time dimension. Temporal dynamics, on the other hand, play a crucial role in understanding the economic and social phenomena, particularly when referring to the analysis of the individual choices leading to the observed clusters of economic activities. With respect to the contributions previously appeared in the literature, this paper uncovers the process of firm demography by studying the dynamics of localization through space-time K-functions. The empirical part of the paper will focus on the study of the long run localization of firms in the area of Rome (Italy), by concentrating on the ICT sector data collected by the Italian Industrial Union in the period 1920- 2005.Agglomeration, Non-parametric measures; Space-time K-functions, Spatial clusters, Spatial econometrics.

    A Cross-Entropy Approach to the Estimation of Generalised Linear Multilevel Models

    Get PDF
    In this paper we use the cross-entropy method for noisy optimisation for fitting generalised linear multilevel models through maximum likelihood. We propose specifications of the instrumental distributions for positive and bounded parameters that improve the computational performance. We also introduce a new stopping criterion, which has the advantage of being problem-independent. In a second step we find, by means of extensive Monte Carlo experiments, the most suitable values of the input parameters of the algorithm. Finally, we compare the method to benchmark estimation technique based on numerical integration. The cross-entropy approach turns out to be preferable from both the statistical and the computational point of view. In the last part of the paper, the method is used to model death probability of firms in the healthcare industry in Italy
    • …
    corecore