35 research outputs found

    CIL:41025, Homo sapiens, motor neuron, stem cell. In Cell Image Library

    No full text

    Maturation of Spinal Motor Neurons Derived from Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    No full text
    Our understanding of motor neuron biology in humans is derived mainly from investigation of human postmortem tissue and more indirectly from live animal models such as rodents. Thus generation of motor neurons from human embryonic stem cells and human induced pluripotent stem cells is an important new approach to model motor neuron function. To be useful models of human motor neuron function, cells generated in vitro should develop mature properties that are the hallmarks of motor neurons in vivo such as elaborated neuronal processes and mature electrophysiological characteristics. Here we have investigated changes in morphological and electrophysiological properties associated with maturation of neurons differentiated from human embryonic stem cells expressing GFP driven by a motor neuron specific reporter (Hb9::GFP) in culture. We observed maturation in cellular morphology seen as more complex neurite outgrowth and increased soma area over time. Electrophysiological changes included decreasing input resistance and increasing action potential firing frequency over 13 days in vitro. Furthermore, these human embryonic stem cell derived motor neurons acquired two physiological characteristics that are thought to underpin motor neuron integrated function in motor circuits; spike frequency adaptation and rebound action potential firing. These findings show that human embryonic stem cell derived motor neurons develop functional characteristics typical of spinal motor neurons in vivo and suggest that they are a relevant and useful platform for studying motor neuron development and function and for modeling motor neuron diseases

    A single trophectoderm biopsy at blastocyst stage is mathematically unable to determine embryo ploidy accurately enough for clinical use

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background It has become increasingly apparent that the trophectoderm (TE) at blastocyst stage is much more mosaic than has been appreciated. Whether preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), utilizing a single TE biopsy (TEB), can reliably determine embryo ploidy has, therefore, increasingly been questioned in parallel. Methods We for that reason here established 2 mathematical models to assess probabilities of false-negative and false-positive results of an on average 6-cell biopsy from an approximately 300-cell TE. This study was a collaborative effort between investigators at The Center for Human Reproduction in New York City and the Center for Studies in Physics and Biology and the Brivanlou Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology and Molecular Embryology, the latter two both at Rockefeller University in New York City. Results Both models revealed that even under best case scenario, assuming even distribution of mosaicism in TE (since mosaicism is usually clonal, a highly unlikely scenario), a biopsy of at least 27 TE cells would be required to reach minimal diagnostic predictability from a single TEB. Conclusions As currently performed, a single TEB is, therefore, mathematically incapable of reliably determining whether an embryo can be transferred or should be discarded. Since a single TEB, as currently performed, apparently is not representative of the complete TE, this study, thus, raises additional concern about the clinical utilization of PGS

    Discovery of Novel Isoforms of Huntingtin Reveals a New Hominid-Specific Exon

    No full text
    <div><p>Huntington’s disease (HD) is a devastating neurological disorder that is caused by an expansion of the poly-Q tract in exon 1 of the Huntingtin gene (HTT). HTT is an evolutionarily conserved and ubiquitously expressed protein that has been linked to a variety of functions including transcriptional regulation, mitochondrial function, and vesicle transport. This large protein has numerous caspase and calpain cleavage sites and can be decorated with several post-translational modifications such as phosphorylations, acetylations, sumoylations, and palmitoylations. However, the exact function of HTT and the role played by its modifications in the cell are still not well understood. Scrutiny of HTT function has been focused on a single, full length mRNA. In this study, we report the discovery of 5 novel <i>HTT</i> mRNA splice isoforms that are expressed in normal and <i>HTT</i>-expanded human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines as well as in cortical neurons differentiated from hESCs. Interestingly, none of the novel isoforms generates a truncated protein. Instead, 4 of the 5 new isoforms specifically eliminate domains and modifications to generate smaller HTT proteins. The fifth novel isoform incorporates a previously unreported additional exon, dubbed 41b, which is hominid-specific and introduces a potential phosphorylation site in the protein. The discovery of this hominid-specific isoform may shed light on human-specific pathogenic mechanisms of HTT, which could not be investigated with current mouse models of the disease.</p></div

    Human ES-derived motor neurons show increasing morphological complexity as they mature <i>in vitro</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Top, schematic of ES cell directed differentiation to motor neurons shows timing of addition of the inductive cues retinoic acid (RA), and sonic hedgehog (SHH). Bottom, timing of morphometric and electrophysiological analyses. (B) Representative image of day 31+5 hESMN showing mature neuronal morphology and co-expression of GFP with motor neuron marker HB9. GFP intensity distinguished hESMN cell bodies (arrow, ∼65,000 gray levels (g.l.)), neurites (arrowhead, ∼18,000 g.l.), and cytoplasmic GFP background in non-MNs (star, ∼800 g.l.). Scale bar 50 µm. (C) Representative camera lucida (Metamorph) neurite traces from 5 randomly chosen (every 8<sup>th</sup>) image fields at day 31+2, 31+5, and 31+9 show increasing neurite size and complexity. Scale bar 40 µm. (D-F) Soma area, branches, total neurite outgrowth and processes (not shown) were quantified (number of cells analyzed at each timepoint shown in brackets in D), median (grey line), mean (red line), 25–75 percentile (grey box), 10–90 percentiles (whisker bars), all outliers (+) are shown for each day from which measurements were made. The values for each morphometric parameter on each day were distributed non-normally (Shapiro-Wilk test, P<0.05) and Kruskal-Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks showed significant changes in (D) cell soma area (H = 43.885, 2 d.f., P<0.001), (E) complexity or branches/cell H = 309.245, 2 d.f., P<0.001), (F) total neurite outgrowth (H = 161.287, 2 d.f., P<0.001), and (not shown) number of primary neurites (median, 25<sup>th</sup>–75<sup>th</sup> percentile: day 33: 3, 2–5; day 36: 6, 5–9; day 40: 8, 6–12, H = 442.555, 2 d.f., P<0.001). All significant <i>post hoc</i> pairwise comparisons, Dunn’s Method, are shown by black bars on graphs. and all pairwise comparisons for primary neurite number were significant, P<0.05.</p

    Representative morphology and membrane potential responses to current step injection in hESMNs at 3 different times <i>in vitro</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Imaging of cells fixed after patch-clamp recordings indicate that recorded cells express the <i>Hb9</i>::GFP reporter transgene (A-C,E,G,and I). Voltage responses and imaging in the same rows are taken from same neurons. The neurons for A-C are same as that shown in F and G. D,F,H show examples of voltage responses to current steps recorded from 3 neurons current-clamped at −58 mV, −60 mV, and −55 mV, respectively. Bottom traces in D,F, and H show injected currents. Scale bars in images are 50 μm.</p

    Spike frequency adaptation (SFA) and rebound action potentials (RAPs) in hESMNs.

    No full text
    <p>(A) An example of the change in instantaneous frequency during a train of action potentials evoked with positive current injection for 1 sec. Inset shows APs (upper) and injected currents (bottom). APs from which ‘a’ and ‘b’ ISI values were measure for SFA calculation are indicated. (B) SFA ratio, calculated as the maximum value of normalized ISIs after any amplitude of positive current injection, increased with DIV (n  = 8, R  = 0.73, P<0.05, Pearson’s linear regression). (C) RAPs were observed in a large subset of hESMNs. Upper trace shows voltage change after negative current injection. Bottom trace shows injected negative current steps. RAP follows the return of current to baseline after the hyperpolarizing step. (D) Incidence of RAPs in hESMNs at 4 different ages as indicated in Fig. 3 legend (n  = 29). Negative current steps with 5 pA increments (to at least 20 pA) were injected while checking for RAPs.</p

    Developmental changes in intrinsic membrane properties of hESMNs.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Input resistance decreased over days <i>in vitro</i> (n  = 28, P<0.01, one-way ANOVA). ∗∗ P<0.01, Tukey’s <i>post hoc</i> test. (B) Resting membrane potential and (C) rheobase did not change (n  = 27 and 29, respectively). Positive current steps were injected in 5 pA increments to distinguish small differences in rheobase among individual neurons. (D) Half-width of action potentials (APs),, changed over time <i>in vitro</i> (n  = 26, P<0.001, one-way ANOVA). ∗∗ P<0.01, ∗∗∗ P<0.001, Tukey’s <i>post hoc</i> test. (E) Maximum frequency of APs after current injection increased over time <i>in vitro</i> (n  = 28, P<0.05, one-way ANOVA). ∗P<0.05, Tukey’s <i>post hoc</i> test. Dots shows frequency values for individual neurons. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of neurons used for analysis taken from 22 dishes in total. In all panels, the first bar represents data from 31+2 DIV, 2<sup>nd</sup> bar is 31+4 DIV, 3<sup>rd</sup> bar is 31+8/31+9 DIV and 4<sup>th</sup> bar is 31+12/31+13 DIV.</p

    Time course of <i>HTT</i> isoform expression in hESCs differentiating to telencephalic neural fate.

    No full text
    <p>(A-D) RUES2 hESCs were differentiated to neural fate by blocking both branches of TGFβ signaling (default mechanism) as described in Materials and Methods. Values are normalized by GAPDH and displayed as fold change to day 0 values. Only the HTT-Δ10 isoform consistently decreases as the cells differentiate, while all three other isoforms maintain their expression levels unchanged. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean of 3 to 6 independent replicates. * p<0.05 vs d0.</p
    corecore