Renal pseudoaneuryms and pulmonary embolism: A unique manifestation of complications following blunt renal trauma

This case report presents a unique manifestation of complications in a 71-year-old man following blunt renal trauma. Initially, computed tomography (CT) revealed a traumatic left kidney laceration. Hematuria ceased quickly after ureteral stent placement. One week later, hematuria reoccurred while the patient was treated for pulmonary embolism. Multiphase CT revealed two renal pseudoaneurysms as the underlying cause. Renal pseudoaneurysms are commonly associated with surgery or inflammation and rarely seen after trauma. Selective angiographic embolization successfully stopped hematuria. Thereafter, the patient was hemodynamically stable to continue therapeutic thrombolysis. After discharge, the patient remained symptom-free and had an unremarkable follow up assessment

Primary urethral squamous cell carcinoma: a unique manifestation of a penile tumor

This case report describes a unique manifestation of a primary urethral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) as the underlying pathology in an 80-year-old male patient who underwent partial penectomy due to an enlarging penile mass. Persistent pain in the right knee was discovered to be a pathologic fracture using magnetic resonance imaging. Computed tomography-guided biopsy confirmed metastatic SCC. Whole-body positron emission tomography revealed systemic dissemination to multiple sites. Orthopedic knee replacement was performed in combination with local radiotherapy. Palliative chemotherapy was rejected due to poor performance status. Primary urethral SCC is rare and an uncommon cause of advanced penile cancer. These findings could be of great interest to clinicians for two reasons. First, a tumor's appearance can be misleading. Consequently, histological work-up in accordance with clinical guidelines is necessary for accurate diagnosis. Second, a more comprehensive investigation is required when clinical symptoms persist despite the use of conventional treatment. Our case is an instance in which persistent pain masked the presence of downstream metastasis. We believe that these aforementioned points are of significant clinical importance and present a salient learning opportunity

Nitinol stent implantation in long superficial femoral artery lesions: 12-month results of the DURABILITY I study

Purpose:To evaluate the long-term efficacy and integrity of the PROTEGE EverFlex stent in superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions in symptomatic patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods: A prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study enrolled 151 subjects (111 men; mean age 67.8 years, range 42-93) undergoing percutaneous treatment of de novo, restenotic, or reoccluded SFA lesions between August 11, 2006, and June 26, 2007. Subjects were scheduled to receive a single stent and be evaluated through 12 months following the implant procedure. Occlusions were present in 40% of the patients. Mean lesion length was 96.4 mm (range 10-150). Results: A total of 161 stents (158 EverFlex) were implanted in the 151 patients: single stents in 93.4% (141/151) and a second stent in 6.6% (10/151). One-year follow-up information was available for 88.7% (134/151) of the study participants; of the remaining 17 subjects, 6 subjects withdrew from the study, 2 were lost to follow-up, and 9 died. Freedom from restenosis data were available for 99.3% (133/134) of the subjects who completed a 12-month follow-up visit. The mean Rutherford classification fell from 2.8 +/- 0.8 (range 1-5) at baseline to 0.6 +/- 1.1 (range 0-5) at 12 months. The mean ankle-brachial index rose from 0.6 +/- 0.2 (range 0-1.4) at baseline to 0.9 +/- 0.2 (range 0-1.2) at 12 months. The rates for freedom from >50% restenosis at 6 and 12 months were 91.3% (95% Cl 84.9% to 95.2%) and 72.2% (95% Cl 63.8% to 79.6%), respectively. The freedom from target lesion revascularization rate at 12 months was 79.1% (95% Cl 71.2% to 85.6%). The 1-year stent fracture rate was 8.1% (95% Cl 4.0% to 14.4%). Conclusion: The high freedom from >50% restenosis and low fracture rate at 12 months suggests that the PROTEGE EverFlex stent offers a safe and acceptably efficacious means of treating SFA lesions in symptomatic subjects with PAD. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:261-26

Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Stents for Iliac Artery Occlusive Disease: The Randomized ICE Trial.

OBJECTIVES Atherosclerosis of iliac arteries is widespread. As inflow vessels, they are of great clinical significance and increasingly being treated by endovascular means. Most commonly, stents are implanted. BACKGROUND So far, due to a lack of comparative data, no guideline recommendations on the preferable stent type, balloon-expandable stent (BE) or self-expanding stent (SE), have been issued. METHODS In this randomized, multicenter study, patients with moderate to severe claudication from common or external iliac artery occlusive disease were assigned 1:1 to either BE or SE. The primary endpoint was binary restenosis at 12 months as determined by duplex ultrasound. Key secondary endpoints were walking impairment, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), hemodynamic success, target limb amputation, and all-cause death. RESULTS Six hundred sixty patients with 660 lesions were enrolled at 18 German and Swiss sites over a period of 34 months; 24.8% of the patients had diabetes and 57.4% were current smokers. The common iliac artery was affected in 58.9%. One hundred nine (16.5%) lesions were totally occluded and 25.6% heavily calcified. Twelve-month incidence of restenosis was 6.1% after SE implantation and 14.9% after BE implantation (p = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from TLR was 97.2% and 93.6%, respectively (p = 0.042). There was no between-group difference in walking impairment, hemodynamic success, amputation rate, all-cause death, or periprocedural complications. CONCLUSIONS The treatment of iliac artery occlusive disease with SE as compared with BE resulted in a lower 12-month restenosis rate and a significantly reduced TLR rate. No safety concerns arose in both groups. (Iliac, Common and External [ICE] Artery Stent Trial; NCT01305174)

Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2) : a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy

Background: Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence. Methods: ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362. Findings: Between Jan 15, 2008, and Dec 31, 2020, 3625 patients in 130 centres were randomly allocated, 1811 to CAS and 1814 to CEA, with good compliance, good medical therapy and a mean 5 years of follow-up. Overall, 1% had disabling stroke or death procedurally (15 allocated to CAS and 18 to CEA) and 2% had non-disabling procedural stroke (48 allocated to CAS and 29 to CEA). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year non-procedural stroke were 2·5% in each group for fatal or disabling stroke, and 5·3% with CAS versus 4·5% with CEA for any stroke (rate ratio [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·86-1·57; p=0·33). Combining RRs for any non-procedural stroke in all CAS versus CEA trials, the RR was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (overall RR 1·11, 95% CI 0·91-1·32; p=0·21). Interpretation: Serious complications are similarly uncommon after competent CAS and CEA, and the long-term effects of these two carotid artery procedures on fatal or disabling stroke are comparable