7 research outputs found

    Do cerebrovascular risk factors impact the clinical expression of idiopathic isolated adult-onset dystonia?

    No full text
    Background: Although acquired dystonia may develop following ischaemic/haemorrhagic stroke, the relationship between cerebrovascular disease and idiopathic dystonia has been poorly investigated. This cross sectional study aimed at evaluating the impact of cerebrovascular risk factors on the clinical expression of idiopathic adult onset dystonia (IAOD), with reference to dystonia localization and dystonia-associated features. Methods: Data were obtained from the Italian Dystonia Registry. Patients with IAOD were stratified into two groups according to the presence of diabetes mellitus and/or arterial hypertension and/or dyslipidemia and/or heart disease. The two groups were compared for demographic features, dystonia phenotype, and dystonia-associated features (sensory trick, tremor, eye symptoms in blepharospasm, and neck pain in cervical dystonia). Results: A total of 1108 patients participated into the study. Patients who reported one cerebrovascular factor or more (n = 555) had higher age and longer disease duration than patients who did not. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, blepharospasm was the only localization, and sensory trick was the only dystonia-associated feature that was significantly associated with cerebrovascular risk factors. Linear regression analysis showed that the strength of the association between cerebrovascular factors and blepharospasm/sensory trick increased with increasing the number of cerebrovascular factors per patient. Conclusions: Results of the present study showed that cerebrovascular risk factors may be associated with specific features of IAOD that is development of blepharospasm and sensory trick. Further studies are needed to better understand the meaning and the mechanisms underlying this association

    MEDICAL SCIENCE. GISSI-2: A factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12 490 patients with acute myocardial infarction

    No full text
    A multicentre, randomised, open trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design was conducted to compare the benefits and risks of two thrombolytic agents, streptokinase (SK, 1\ub75 MU infused intravenously over 30-60 min) and alteplase (tPA, 100 mg infused intravenously over 3 h) in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to coronary care units within 6 h from onset of symptoms. The patients were also randomised to receive heparin (12 500 U subcutaneously twice daily until discharge from hospital, starting 12 h after beginning the tPA or SK infusion) or usual therapy. All patients without specific contraindications were given atenolol (5-10 mg iv) and aspirin (300-325 mg a day). The end-point of the study was the combined estimate of death plus severe left ventricular damage. 12 490 patients were randomised to four treatment groups (SK alone, SK plus heparin, tPA alone, tPA plus heparin). No specific differences between the two thrombolytic agents were detected as regards the combined end-point (tPA 23\ub71%; SK 22\ub75%; relative risk 1\ub704, 95% Cl 0\ub795-1\ub713), nor after the addition of heparin to the aspirin treatment (hep 22\ub77%, no hep 22\ub79%; RR 0\ub799, 95% Cl 0\ub791-1\ub708). The outcome of patients allocated to the four treatment groups was similar with respect to baseline risk factors such as age, Killip class, hours from onset of symptoms, and site and type of infarct. The rates of major in-hospital cardiac complications (reinfarction, post-infarction angina) were also similar. The incidence of major bleeds was significantly higher in SK and heparin treated patients (respectively, tPA 0\ub75%, SK 1\ub70%, RR 0\ub757, 95% Cl 0\ub738-0\ub785; hep 1\ub70%, no hep 0\ub76%, RR 1\ub764, 95% Cl 1\ub709-2\ub745), whereas the overall incidence of stroke was similar in all groups. SK and tPA appear equally effective and safe for use in routine conditions of care, in all infarct patients who have no contraindications, with or without post-thrombolytic heparin treatment. The 8\ub78% hospital mortality of the study population (compared with approximately 13% in the control cohort of the GISSI-1 trial) indicates the beneficial impact of the proven acute treatments for AMI. \ua9 1990
    corecore