6 research outputs found
Percentages of correct recognition of right and wrong arithmetic results as a function of operation difficulty and type of background auditory stimuli.
<p>There was no effect of the background auditory stimuli on hits during the solving of easy arithmetical operations (the “ceiling effect)”.</p
Mean response times (in ms) recorded as a function of the type of background auditory stimuli and operation difficulty.
<p>Notably, the background auditory stimuli had no effect on RTs during the solving of easy arithmetical operations (the “floor effect”).</p
Mean response times (in ms) recorded as a function of group (extroverts vs. introverts) and background auditory stimuli.
<p>The auditory stimulation had a stronger “Mozart” (alerting) effect on extroverts.</p
Mean response times (in ms) recorded as a function of background auditory stimuli, result correctness and operation difficulty.
<p>Auditory stimulation quickened responses only when the operations were difficult.</p
Mean scores obtained by the two groups of participants in the three dimensions measured by the <i>Eysenck Personality Inventory</i> (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1965): Standard deviation values are reported in italics.
<p>Mean scores obtained by the two groups of participants in the three dimensions measured by the <i>Eysenck Personality Inventory</i> (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1965): Standard deviation values are reported in italics.</p
Percentages of correct recognition of right and wrong arithmetic results as a function of operation difficulty (left).
<p>Response times relative to the correct recognition of right and wrong arithmetic results as a function of operation difficulty (right).</p