Facial motor system: voluntary and emotional control

Face expressions have a crucial role in human nonverbal behaviour and can be either voluntarily or emotionally controlled. The variety of functions of facial muscles, is reflected in their anatomical and histological characteristics. Face muscles present a peculiar coordination, in fact also during voluntary movements, facial muscles’ groups are always recruited together to produce a facial posture, but how and at which level they are coordinated and controlled by the emotional system is still unknown. For long time was impossible to study the motor control of facial muscle in humans. Only recently several studies have demonstrated that it is possible to probe it using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). This work thesis attempted to investigate: 1) the interhemispheric connections between facial motor cortices (fM1);2) the cerebellar-fM1 connectivity; and 3) the influence of emotional stimuli over fM1 and pre-motor cortices, using TMS protocols. Results provided the first demonstration that : 1) the corpus callosum plays a minor role in the coordination of bilateral face movements; 2) A clear cerebellar-fM1 connectivity operates in the facial motor system; 3) fM1 is directly connected with the emotional system and specifically modulated by stimuli with positive connotation

Is it possible to compare inhibitory and excitatory intracortical circuits in face and hand primary motor cortex?

Face muscles are important in a variety of different functions, such as feeding, speech and communication of non-verbal affective states, which require quite different patterns of activity from those of a typical hand muscle. We ask whether there are differences in their neurophysiological control that might reflect this. Fifteen healthy individuals were studied. Standard single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methods were used to compare intracortical inhibitory (short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI); cortical silent period (CSP)) and excitatory circuitries (short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF)) in two typical muscles, the depressor anguli oris (DAO), a face muscle, and the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), a hand muscle. TMS threshold was higher in DAO than in FDI. Over a range of intensities, resting SICF was not different between DAO and FDI, while during muscle activation SICF was stronger in FDI than in DAO (P = 0.012). At rest, SICI was stronger in FDI than in DAO (P = 0.038) but during muscle contraction, SICI was weaker in FDI than in DAO (P = 0.034). We argue that although many of the difference in response to the TMS protocols could result from the difference in thresholds, some, such as the reduction of resting SICI in DAO, may reflect fundamental differences in the physiology of the two muscle groups

Lack of evidence for interhemispheric inhibition in the lower face primary motor cortex

Objective:To investigate interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) between the facial primary motor cortices(fM1s).Methods:IHI was investigated in 10 healthy subjects using paired-pulse TMS in the depressor anguli oris(DAO), upper trapezius (UT) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. Conditioning stimuli (CS) of90–130% resting motor threshold (RMT) preceded test motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by 7 interstimulusintervals (ISIs) ranging 4–12 ms. In the DAO, we also examined IHI at 1–2 ms ISIs.Results:IHI was detected in the UT (CS 130% RMT; ISI 8 ms;p= 0.02) and FDI (CS 120% and 130% RMT, at8–10 ms ISIs;p= 0.004), but not in DAO at any ISI, instead, there was facilitation at 1–4 ms ISIs and110–130% RMT CS. In the DAO, conditioned responses at 1–4 ms ISIs were significantly larger than bothtest MEPs and the response induced by the CS alone.Conclusion:In the DAO there was no evidence of IHI even though this was clear in hand and axialmuscles. Control experiments excluded a transcallosal origin of the facilitation observed at the shortestintervals.Significance:Data suggest that integrated bilateral control of facial muscles occurs mainly at the level ofbrainstem circuits engaged by corticobulbar output from fM1

Cerebellar Theta-Burst Stimulation Impairs Memory Consolidation in Eyeblink Classical Conditioning

Associative learning of sensorimotor contingences, as it occurs in eyeblink classical conditioning (EBCC), is known to involve the cerebellum, but its mechanism remains controversial. EBCC involves a sequence of learning processes which are thought to occur in the cerebellar cortex and deep cerebellar nuclei. Recently, the extinction phase of EBCC has been shown to be modulated after one week by cerebellar continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS). Here, we asked whether cerebellar cTBS could affect retention and reacquisition of conditioned responses (CRs) tested immediately after conditioning. We also investigated a possible lateralized cerebellar control of EBCC by applying cTBS on both the right and left cerebellar hemispheres. Both right and left cerebellar cTBSs induced a statistically significant impairment in retention and new acquisition of conditioned responses (CRs), the disruption effect being marginally more effective when the left cerebellar hemisphere was stimulated. These data support a model in which cTBS impairs retention and reacquisition of CR in the cerebellum, possibly by interfering with the transfer of memory to the deep cerebellar nuclei

Transcutaneous trigeminal nerve stimulation induces a long-term depression-like plasticity of the human blink reflex.

The beneficial effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) on several neurological disorders are increasingly acknowledged. Hypothesized mechanisms include the modulation of excitability in networks involved by the disease, and its main site of action has been recently reported at brain stem level. Aim of this work was to test whether acute TNS modulates brain stem plasticity using the blink reflex (BR) as a model. The BR was recorded from 20 healthy volunteers before and after 20 min of cyclic transcutaneous TNS delivered bilaterally to the infraorbital nerve. Eleven subjects underwent sham-TNS administration and were compared to the real-TNS group. In 12 subjects, effects of unilateral TNS were tested. The areas of the R1 and R2 components of the BR were recorded before and after 0 (T0), 15 (T15), 30 (T30), and 45 (T45) min from TNS. In three subjects, T60 and T90 time points were also evaluated. Ipsi- and contralateral R2 areas were significantly suppressed after bilateral real-TNS at T15 (p = 0.013), T30 (p = 0.002), and T45 (p = 0.001), while R1 response appeared unaffected. The TNS-induced inhibitory effect on R2 responses lasted up to 60 min. Real- and sham-TNS protocols produced significantly different effects (p = 0.005), with sham-TNS being ineffective at any time point tested. Bilateral TNS was more effective (p = 0.009) than unilateral TNS. Acute TNS induced a bilateral long-lasting inhibition of the R2 component of the BR, which resembles a long-term depression-like effect, providing evidence of brain stem plasticity produced by transcutaneous TNS. These findings add new insight into mechanisms of TNS neuromodulation and into physiopathology of those neurological disorders where clinical benefits of TNS are recognized

Happy faces selectively increase the excitability of cortical neurons innervating frowning muscles of the mouth

Although facial muscles are heavily involved in emotional expressions, there is still a lack of evidence about the role of face primary motor cortex (face M1) in the processing of facial recognition and expression. This work investigated the effects of the passive viewing of different facial expressions on face M1 and compared data with those obtained from the hand M1. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly assigned to two groups undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of face or hand M1. In both groups, short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were probed in the depressor anguli oris (DAO) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles 300 ms after presentation of a picture of a face that expressed happy, sad or neutral emotions. Statistical analysis of SICI showed a non-significant effect of muscle (F1,28 = 1.903, p = 0.179), but a significant effect of emotion (F2,56 = 6.860, p = 0.004) and a significant interaction between muscle and emotion (F2,56 = 5.072, p = 0.015). Post hoc analysis showed that there was a significant reduction of SICI in the DAO muscle after presentation of a face with a happy expression compared with a neutral face (p < 0.001). In the FDI, a significant difference was observed between neutral and sad expressions (p = 0.010) No clear differences in ICF were detected. The different responses of face and hand muscles to emotional stimuli may be due to their functional roles in emotional expression versus protection of the body

Abnormalities in the face primary motor cortex in oromandibular dystonia

Objective: To comprehensively investigate excitability in face and hand M1 and sensorimotor integration in oromandibular dystonia (OMD) patients. Methods: Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short (SAI) and long (LAI) afferent inhibition were investigated in face and hand M1 using transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols in 10 OMD patients. Data were compared with those obtained in 10 patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD), in 10 patients with blepharospasm (BSP), and 10 matched healthy subjects (HS). Results: Results demonstrated that in OMD patients SICI was reduced in face M1 (p < 0.001), but not in hand M1, compared to HS. In FHD, SICI was significantly impaired in hand M1 (p = 0.029), but not in face M1. In BSP, SICI was normal in both face and hand M1 while ICF and LAI were normal in all patient groups and cortical area tested. SAI was significantly reduced (p = 0.003) only in the face M1 of OMD patients. Conclusions: In OMD, SICI and SAI were significantly reduced. These abnormalities are specific to the motor cortical area innervating the muscular district involved in focal dystonia. Significance: In OMD, the integration between sensory inflow and motor output seem to be disrupted at cortical level with topographic specificity

A Comprehensive assessment of the cross-training effect in ankle dorsiflexors of healthy subjects: a randomized controlled study

Purpose: To investigate the cross-training effect, induced on ankle dorsiflexors (AD) by unilateral strength-training of the contralateral muscles, as transfer of peak torque (PT) and muscle work (MW) and their relative contributions to muscle performance. Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to a training or control group. The trained group sustained a 4-week maximal isokinetic training of the stronger AD at 90 and 45°/s. At both angular velocities, PT, MW and MW/PT ratio were measured from both legs at baseline and after intervention (trained group) or no-intervention (controls). The familiarization/learning-effect was calculated and subtracted by PT and MW measures to obtain their net changes. Results: Net PT increased in both legs (untrained: +27.5% at 90°/s and +17.9% at 45°/s; trained: +15% at 90°/s and +16.3% at 45°/s). Similarly, net MW increased in both the untrained (90°/s: +29.6%; 45°/s: +37%) and trained (90°/s: +23.4%; 45°/s: +18.3%) legs. PT and MW gains were larger in the untrained than trained AD (p < 0.0005), with MW improving more than PT at 45°/s (p = 0.04). The MW/PT ratio increased bilaterally only in the trained group (p < 0.05), depending on the angular velocity. Conclusions: The cross-training effect occurred in AD muscles in terms of both PT and MW, with MW adding valuable information to PT-analysis in describing muscle performance. Moreover, the MW/PT ratio allowed estimating the contributions of these parameters to muscle capability and may represent a novel index in isokinetic testing. The greater improvements in the untrained than trained limb raises interesting clinical implications in asymmetric conditions