Association of varicosities and concomitant deep venous thrombosis in patients with superficial venous thrombosis, a systematic review

BACKGROUND: In patients with superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) co-existence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) can be present. Varicosities are considered as a risk factor for both SVT and DVT separately. However, current evidence is contradictory whether varicosities are associated with an increased or reduced prevalence of concomitant DVT in patients with SVT. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic value of both presence and absence of varicosities in the detection of concomitant DVT in non-hospitalized patients with SVT. METHODS: In MEDLINE and EMBASE, a systematic search was performed to collect all published studies on this topic. The selected papers were critically appraised. By diagnostic 2 × 2 tables prior probabilities and predictive values were computed. RESULTS: Six relevant articles were identified. The prior probability of concomitant DVT in patients referred from primary care to the outpatient clinic varied between 13 and 34%. In five studies, absence of varicosities was related to a higher probability of concomitant DVT (33-44%) compared to a presence of varicosities (3-23%). The sixth study showed an inversed, non-significant association: DVT was present in 21% of patients with SVT on non-varicose veins versus in 35% of patients with SVT on varicose veins. CONCLUSION: In five out of six studies on patients with SVT in outpatient settings, absence of varicosities was related to a higher probability of concomitant DVT. Further research is needed to determine whether an assessment of varicosities in general practice could result in an improved selection of patients who require additional imaging to detect or exclude DVT

The effects of low-dose simvastatin and ezetimibe compared to high-dose simvastatin alone on post-fat load endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome: a randomized double-blind crossover trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Insulin resistance is associated with postprandial hyperlipidemia and endothelial dysfunction. Patients with metabolic syndrome, characterized by insulin resistance, are at increased cardiovascular risk. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a similar low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) reduction with combination therapy of low-dose simvastatin and ezetimibe or with high-dose simvastatin alone has similar effects on (post-fat load) endothelial function. METHODS: Randomized, double blind, crossover trial in 19 male obese patients with metabolic syndrome with high-dose simvastatin 80 mg versus combination therapy of low-dose simvastatin 10 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg. Fasting and post-fat load lipids and endothelial function (brachial artery flow-mediated dilation) were determined. RESULTS: Fasting LDL-c concentrations (2.1 +/- 0.5 mmol/L) and fasting endothelial function (6.9 +/- 0.8 vs. 7.6 +/- 1.2%) were the same after both treatments. Although post-fat load plasma triglycerides concentrations were higher (3.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.2 mmol x h/L) with combination therapy compared to monotherapy, ApoB particles were comparable (0.9 +/- 3.3 vs. -0.2 +/- 2.3 g x h/L). Combination therapy did not decrease post-fat load endothelial function (7.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 7.7 +/- 1.6%), contrary to high-dose simvastatin monotherapy (6.9 +/- 0.8 vs. 4.3 +/- 0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with low-dose simvastatin and ezetimibe preserved post-fat load endothelial function, contrary to treatment with high-dose simvastatin monotherapy in male metabolic syndrome patients. There were no differences in fasting lipid profiles and endothelial functio

Tailored anticoagulant treatment after a first venous thromboembolism: protocol of the Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prevention (L-TRRiP) study - cohort-based randomised controlled trial

Introduction Patients with a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of recurrence. Recurrent VTE (rVTE) can be prevented by extended anticoagulant therapy, but this comes at the cost of an increased risk of bleeding. It is still uncertain whether patients with an intermediate recurrence risk or with a high recurrence and high bleeding risk will benefit from extended anticoagulant treatment, and whether a strategy where anticoagulant duration is tailored on the predicted risks of rVTE and bleeding can improve outcomes. The aim of the Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prevention (L-TRRiP) study is to evaluate the outcomes of tailored duration of long-term anticoagulant treatment based on individualised assessment of rVTE and major bleeding risks.Methods and analysis The L-TRRiP study is a multicentre, open-label, cohort-based, randomised controlled trial, including patients with a first VTE. We classify the risk of rVTE and major bleeding using the L-TRRiP and VTE-BLEED scores, respectively. After 3 months of anticoagulant therapy, patients with a low rVTE risk will discontinue anticoagulant treatment, patients with a high rVTE and low bleeding risk will continue anticoagulant treatment, whereas all other patients will be randomised to continue or discontinue anticoagulant treatment. All patients will be followed up for at least 2 years. Inclusion will continue until the randomised group consists of 608 patients; we estimate to include 1600 patients in total. The primary outcome is the combined incidence of rVTE and major bleeding in the randomised group after 2 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of rVTE and major bleeding, functional outcomes, quality of life and cost-effectiveness in all patients.Ethics and dissemination The protocol was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden-Den Haag-Delft. Results are expected in 2028 and will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and during (inter)national conferences.Trial registration number NCT06087952