The presence of crystals of sodium polystyrene sulfonate in the colonic wall: innocent bystander or pathogenic factor?

Hyperkalemia is a frequent electrolyte disturbance in patients on dialysis or non-dialysis CKD patients, including those using renin-angiotensin system inhibitor drugs. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS; Kayexalate) is a resin widely used for hyperkalemia treatment. Unfortunately, its use entails some serious unwanted gastrointestinal side effects. We report the case of a 64-year-old male diabetic patient, suffering from ESRD on hemodialysis, who was treated with 30 g of Kayexalate twice a week (long interdialytic interval). This is a quite common case in the clinical practice. The patient experienced an episode of rectal bleeding followed by the diagnosis of non-specific colitis through colonoscopy. Histological examination, showed the presence of crystals of Kayexalate in the colonic mucosa leading to the suspect of iatrogenic intestinal damage caused by Kayexalate administration. Treatment with SPS was stopped. Nevertheless crystals remain evident in the intestinal mucosa in a colonoscopy performed 14 months later due to a new episode of rectal bleeding. Two years after the first episode the patient died because of intestinal infarction. The review of the literature highlights the risk of serious side effects such as necrotizing colitis with perforation both for the drug in sodium phase and in calcium phase. New intestinal potassium-binger agents, apparently without intestinal severe side effects, are under clinical evaluation. This case does not assess if the crystals deposited in the colonic mucosa are inert or have contributed to the final event, but it shows that Kayexalate is a drug with potential harmful effect even when used orally, at very low dosage and without sorbitol. In our opinion, the SPS should be prescribed carefully, especially as chronic administration, and the prescription should be limited to real and pressing requirements

Dialysis exercise team: the way to sustain exercise programs in hemodialysis patients.

Patients affected by end-stage renal disease (ESRD) show quite lower physical activity and exercise capacity when compared to healthy individuals. In addition, a sedentary lifestyle is favoured by lack of a specific counseling on exercise implementation in the nephrology care setting. Increasing physical activity level should represent a goal for every dialysis patient care management. Three crucial elements of clinical care may contribute to sustain a hemodialysis exercise program: a) involvement of exercise professionals, b) real commitment of nephrologists and dialysis professionals, c) individual patient adaptation of the exercise program. Dialysis staff have a crucial role to encourage and assist patients during intra-dialysis exercise, but other professionals should be included in the ideal "exercise team"for dialysis patients. Evaluation of general condition, comorbidities (especially cardiovascular), nutritional status and physical exercise capacity are mandatory to propose an exercise program, in either extra-dialysis or intra-dialysis setting. To this aim, nephrologist should lead a team of specialists and professionals including cardiologist, physiotherapist, exercise physiologist, renal dietician and nurse. In this scenario, dialysis nurses play a pivotal role since they guarantee a constant and direct approach. Unfortunately dialysis staff may often lack of information and formation about exercise management while they take care patients during the dialysis session. Building an effective exercise team, promoting the culture of exercise and increasing physical activity levels lead to a more complete and modern clinical care management of ESRD patients

Risk factors for relapse and long-term outcome of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis

Background: Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RF) is a rare disease of unclear etiology characterized by the presence of fibroinflammatory tissue in the retroperitoneal space, which can entrap and obstruct retroperitoneal structures, notably the ureters. The disease responds well to steroid therapy, but tends to recur even after years. The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term renal outcome of patients affected by idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis looking for predictive risk factors for recurrence of the disease and progression to end-stage renal disease. Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients with idiopathic RF diagnosed from 2004 to 2017 and follow-up of at least 1 year after the end of first course therapy with steroid, with or without tamoxifen (TMX) and with urological procedures when applicable. Results: Forty-three patients were included in the study. The follow-up was 93 ± 52 months. All the patients obtained remission after therapy that was maintained until the last observation in 26 of them. In 17 patients, there was at least one recurrence. Risk factors associated with relapse were identified and resulted in smoking habit, onset with acute kidney injury (AKI), low back pain and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) positivity. Renal function remained fairly stable during the long-term follow-up. The renal end-point (doubling of serum creatinine or ESRD) occurred in 8% of the patients; however, eGFR in patients with relapse was similar to that of non-recurrent at the diagnoses, but it decreased over time more in the relapsing than in non-relapsing patients (p group = 0.20; p time = 0.001; p time × group interactions = 0.04). Based on these 4 predictor conditions, patients were divided into “low risk” (with 0–1 risk factor), and “high risk” (3–4 risk factors). The renal end-point occurred in 40% of high-risk patients, while none of the low-risk patients reached it (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Smoking habit, AKI at diagnosis, ANA positivity and lumbar pain were associated with relapse of RF after initial remission due to steroid and/or TMX therapy; the combination of these conditions was also predictive of worse renal function outcome. Identification of risk factors for relapse can be useful not only to modulate the choice, the dosage of first-line treatment and the duration of maintenance therapy but also for preventing a progressive loss of kidney function, as well

Current management of hyperkalemia in non-dialysis CKD: Longitudinal study of patients receiving stable nephrology care

Background: No study has explored the limitations of current long-term management of hyperkalemia (HK) in outpatient CKD clinics. Methods: We evaluated the association between current therapeutic options and control of serum K (sK) during 12-month follow up in ND-CKD patients stratified in four groups by HK (sK ≥ 5.0 mEq/L) at baseline and month 12: Absent (no-no), Resolving (yes-no), New Onset (no-yes), Persistent (yes-yes). Results: We studied 562 patients (age 66.2 ± 14.5 y; 61% males; eGFR 39.8 ± 21.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, RAASI 76.2%). HK was “absent” in 50.7%, “resolving” in 15.6%, “new onset” in 16.6%, and “persistent” in 17.1%. Twenty-four hour urinary measurements testified adherence to nutritional recommendations in the four groups at either visit. We detected increased prescription from baseline to month 12 of bicarbonate supplements (from 5.0 to 14.1%, p < 0.0001), K-binders (from 2.0 to 7.7%, p < 0.0001), and non-K sparing diuretics (from 34.3 to 41.5%, p < 0.001); these changes were consistent across groups. Similar results were obtained when using higher sK level (≥5.5 mEq/L) to stratify patients. Mixed-effects regression analysis showed that higher sK over time was associated with eGFR < 60, diabetes, lower serum bicarbonate, lower use of non-K sparing diuretics, bicarbonate supplementation, and K-binder use. Treatment-by-time interaction showed that sK decreased in HK patients given bicarbonate (p = 0.003) and K-binders (p = 0.005). Conclusions: This observational study discloses that one-third of ND-CKD patients under nephrology care remain with or develop HK during a 12-month period despite low K intake and increased use of sK-lowering drugs

N-3 fatty acids in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors

BACKGROUND: Trials have shown a beneficial effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients with a previous myocardial infarction or heart failure. We evaluated the potential benefit of such therapy in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors or atherosclerotic vascular disease who had not had a myocardial infarction. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we enrolled a cohort of patients who were followed by a network of 860 general practitioners in Italy. Eligible patients were men and women with multiple cardiovascular risk factors or atherosclerotic vascular disease but not myocardial infarction. Patients were randomly assigned to n-3 fatty acids (1 g daily) or placebo (olive oil). The initially specified primary end point was the cumulative rate of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. At 1 year, after the event rate was found to be lower than anticipated, the primary end point was revised as time to death from cardiovascular causes or admission to the hospital for cardiovascular causes. RESULTS: Of the 12,513 patients enrolled, 6244 were randomly assigned to n-3 fatty acids and 6269 to placebo. With a median of 5 years of follow-up, the primary end point occurred in 1478 of 12,505 patients included in the analysis (11.8%), of whom 733 of 6239 (11.7%) had received n-3 fatty acids and 745 of 6266 (11.9%) had received placebo (adjusted hazard ratio with n-3 fatty acids, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.08; P=0.58). The same null results were observed for all the secondary end points. CONCLUSIONS: In a large general-practice cohort of patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, daily treatment with n-3 fatty acids did not reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Copyright © 2013 Massachusetts Medical Society