Enterotomy Closure after Minimally Invasive Distal Gastrectomy with Intracorporeal Anastomosis: A Multicentric Study

Introduction: Despite progressive improvements in technical skills and instruments have facilitate surgeons to perform intracorporeal gastro-jejunal and jejuno-jejunal anastomoses, one of the big challenging task is handsewn knot tying. We analysed the better way to fashion an handsewn intracorporeal enterotomy closure after a stapled anastomosis.Methods: All 579 consecutive patients from January 2009 to December 2019 who underwent minimally invasive partial gastrectomy for gastric cancer at thirteen high-volume institutions were retrospectively analysed. Different ways to fashion intracorporeal anastomoses were investigated: robotic vs. laparoscopic approach; laparoscopic HD vs. 3D vs. 4K technology; single layer vs. double layer enterotomies. Additionally, double layer enterotomies were analysed layer by layer, comparing running vs. interrupted suture; presence vs. absence of deep corner suture and type of suture thread (barbed, braided, non-braided suture).Results: Significant lower rates of bleeding (p = 0,011) and leakage (p = 0,048) from gastro-jejunal anastomosis were recorded in the double-layer group. Comparing barbed to braided and non-braided suture threads, the first was significantly associated to reduced intraluminal bleeding and leakage rates both in the first (p = 0,042 and p = 0,010) and second layer (p = 0,002 and p = 0,029). Conclusions: Our study found that double-layer sutures using barbed suture thread both in first and second layer to fashion enterotomy closure results in lower intraluminal bleeding and anastomotic leak rates

ERas and COLorectal endoscopic surgery: an Italian society for endoscopic surgery and new technologies (SICE) national report

Background Several reports demonstrated a strong association between the level of adherence to the protocol and improved clinical outcomes after surgery. However, it is difficult to obtain full adherence to the protocol into clinical practice and has still not been identified the threshold beyond which improved functional results can be reached. Methods The ERCOLE (ERas and COLorectal Endoscopic surgery) study was as a cohort, prospective, multi-centre national study evaluating the association between adherence to ERAS items and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was to associate the percentage of ERAS adherence to functional recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study was to validate safety of the ERAS programme evaluating complications' occurrence according to Clavien-Dindo classification and to evaluate the compliance of the Italian surgeons to each ERAS item. Results 1138 patients were included. Adherence to the ERAS protocol was full only in 101 patients (8.9%), > 75% of the ERAS items in 736 (64.7%) and > 50% in 1127 (99%). Adherence to > 75% was associated with a better functional recovery with 90.2 +/- 98.8 vs 95.9 +/- 33.4 h (p = 0.003). At difference, full adherence to the ERAS components 91.7 +/- 22.1 vs 92.2 +/- 31.6 h (p = 0.8) was not associated with better recovery. Conclusions Our results were encouraging to affirm that adherence to the ERAS program up to 75% could be considered satisfactory to get the goal. Our study could be considered a call to simplify the ERAS protocol facilitating its penetrance into clinical practice