Dependence of the Formation of Tau and Aβ Peptide Mixed Aggregates on the Secondary Structure of the N‑Terminal Region of Aβ

One of the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease is the formation of aggregates of the tau protein, a process that can be facilitated by the presence of fibrils formed by the amyloid β peptide (Aβ). However, the mechanism that triggers tau aggregation is still a matter of debate. The effect of Aβ₄₀ fibrils on the aggregation of the repeat domain of tau (TauRD) is investigated here by employing coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. The results indicate that the repeat domain of tau has a high affinity for Aβ₄₀ fibrils, with the ₂₆₁GSTENLK₂₆₇ fragment of tau driving TauRD toward the ₁₆KLVFFA₂₁ fragment in Aβ₄₀. Monomeric Aβ₄₀, in which the ₁₆KLVFFA₂₁ fragment is rarely found in an extended conformation (as in the fibril), has a low affinity for the TauRD, indicating that the ability of Aβ₄₀ fibrils to bind to the TauRD depends on the ₁₆KLVFFA₂₁ fragment of Aβ adopting an extended conformation

Elucidating Important Sites and the Mechanism for Amyloid Fibril Formation by Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics

Fibrils formed by the β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide play a central role in the development of Alzheimer’s disease. In this study, the principles governing their growth and stability are investigated by analyzing canonical and replica-exchange molecular dynamics trajectories of Aβ_(9–40) fibrils. In particular, an unstructured monomer was allowed to interact freely with an Aβ fibril template. Trajectories were generated with the coarse-grained united-residue force field, and one- and two-dimensional free-energy landscapes (FELs) along the backbone virtual-bond angle θ and backbone virtual-bond-dihedral angle γ of each residue and principal components, respectively, were analyzed. Also, thermal unbinding (unfolding) of an Aβ peptide from the fibril template was investigated. These analyses enable us to illustrate the entire process of Aβ fibril elongation and to elucidate the key residues involved in it. Several different pathways were identified during the search for the fibril conformation by the monomer, which finally follows a dock-lock mechanism with two distinct locking stages. However, it was found that the correct binding, with native hydrogen bonds, of the free monomer to the fibril template at both stages is crucial for fibril elongation. In other words, if the monomer is incorrectly bound (with nonnative hydrogen bonds) to the fibril template during the first “docking” stage, it can remain attached to it for a long time before it dissociates and either attempts a different binding or allows another monomer to bind. This finding is consistent with an experimentally observed “stop-and-go” mechanism of fibril growth

Local vs Global Motions in Protein Folding

It is of interest to know whether local fluctuations in a polypeptide chain play any role in the mechanism by which the chain folds to the native structure of a protein. This question is addressed by analyzing folding and nonfolding trajectories of a protein; as an example, the analysis is applied to the 37-residue triple β-strand WW domain from the Formin binding protein 28 (FBP28) (PDB ID: 1E0L). Molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories were generated with the coarse-grained united-residue force field, and one- and two-dimensional free-energy landscapes (FELs) along the backbone virtual-bond angle <i>θ</i> and backbone virtual-bond-dihedral angle <i>γ</i> of each residue and principal components, respectively, were analyzed. The key residues involved in the folding of the FBP28 WW domain are elucidated by this analysis. The correlations between local and global motions are found. It is shown that most of the residues in the folding trajectories of the system studied here move in a concerted fashion, following the dynamics of the whole system. This demonstrates how the choice of a pathway has to involve concerted movements in order for this protein to fold. This finding also sheds light on the effectiveness of principal component analysis (PCA) for the description of the folding dynamics of the system studied. It is demonstrated that the FEL along the PCs, computed by considering only several critically-placed residues, can correctly describe the folding dynamics

New Insights into Protein (Un)Folding Dynamics

A fundamental open problem in biophysics is how the folded structure of the main chain (MC) of a protein is determined by the physics of the interactions between the side chains (SCs). All-atom molecular dynamics simulations of a model protein (Trp-cage) revealed that strong correlations between the motions of the SCs and the MC occur transiently at 380 K in unfolded segments of the protein and during the simulations of the whole amino-acid sequence at 450 K. The high correlation between the SC and MC fluctuations is a fundamental property of the unfolded state and is also relevant to unstructured proteins as intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), for which new reaction coordinates are introduced. The presented findings may open a new door as to how functions of IDPs are related to conformations, which play a crucial role in neurodegenerative diseases

From a Highly Disordered to a Metastable State: Uncovering Insights of α‑Synuclein

α-Synuclein (αS) is a major constituent of Lewy bodies, the insoluble aggregates that are the hallmark of one of the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders, Parkinson’s disease (PD). The vast majority of experiments in vitro and in vivo provide extensive evidence that a disordered monomeric form is the predominant state of αS in water solution, and it undergoes a large-scale disorder-to-helix transition upon binding to vesicles of different types. Recently, another form, tetrameric, of αS with a stable helical structure was identified experimentally. It has been shown that a dynamic intracellular population of metastable αS tetramers and monomers coexists normally; and the tetramer plays an essential role in maintaining αS homeostasis. Therefore, it is of interest to know whether the tetramer can serve as a means of preventing or delaying the start of PD. Before answering this very important question, it is, first, necessary to find out, on an atomistic level, a correlation between tetramers and monomers; what mediates tetramer formation and what makes a tetramer stable. We address these questions here by investigating both monomeric and tetrameric forms of αS. In particular, by examining correlations between the motions of the side chains and the main chain, steric parameters along the amino-acid sequence, and one- and two-dimensional free-energy landscapes along the coarse-grained dihedral angles γ and δ and principal components, respectively, in monomeric and tetrameric αS, we were able to shed light on a fundamental relationship between monomers and tetramers, and the key residues involved in mediating formation of a tetramer. Also, the reasons for the stability of tetrameric αS and inability of monomeric αS to fold are elucidated here