48 research outputs found

    Juxta-articular myxoma of the knee in a 5-year-old boy: a case report and review of the literature (2009: 12b)

    Get PDF
    Juxta-articular myxoma (JAM) is a relatively rare variant of myxoma that occurs in the vicinity of large joints. It is composed of fibroblast-like cells that produce an excessive amount of glycosaminoglycans rich in hyaluronic acid. The peak incidence is between the 3rd and 5th decades of life. In this report we describe an extremely rare case of JAM in the knee of a 5-year-old child. The clinical presentation, radiological features and histopathologic findings are described, and the relevant literature is reviewed

    Diagnostic Value of Lumbar Facet Joint Injection: A Prospective Triple Cross-Over Study

    Get PDF
    The diagnosis “lumbar facet syndrome” is common and often indicates severe lumbar spine surgery procedures. It is doubtful whether a painful facet joint (FJ) can be identified by a single FJ block. The aim of this study was to clarify the validity of a single and placebo controlled bilateral FJ blocks using local anesthetics. A prospective single blinded triple cross-over study was performed. 60 patients (31 f, 29 m, mean age 53.2 yrs (22–73)) with chronic low back pain (mean pain persistance 31 months, 6 months of conservative treatment without success) admitted to a local orthopaedic department for surgical or conservative therapy of chronic LBP, were included in the study. Effect on pain reduction (10 point rating scale) was measured. The 60 subjects were divided into six groups with three defined sequences of fluoroscopically guided bilateral monosegmental lumbar FJ test injections in “oblique needle” technique: verum-(local anaesthetic-), placebo-(sodium chloride-) and sham-injection. Carry-over and periodic effects were evaluated and a descriptive and statistical analysis regarding the effectiveness, difference and equality of the FJ injections and the different responses was performed. The results show a high rate of non-response, which documents the lack of reliable and valid predictors for a positive response towards FJ blocks. There was a high rate of placebo reactions noted, including subjects who previously or later reacted positively to verum injections. Equivalence was shown among verum vs. placebo and partly vs. sham also. With regard to test validity criteria, a single intraarticular FJ block with local anesthetics is not useful to detect the pain-responsible FJ and therefore is no valid and reliable diagostic tool to specify indication of lumbar spine surgery. Comparative FJ blocks with local anesthetics and placebo-controls have to be interpretated carefully also, because they solely give no proper diagnosis on FJ being main pain generator

    The provocative lumbar facet joint

    Get PDF
    Low back pain is the most common pain symptom experienced by American adults and is the second most common reason for primary care physician visits. There are many structures in the lumbar spine that can serve as pain generators and often the etiology of low back pain is multifactorial. However, the facet joint has been increasingly recognized as an important cause of low back pain. Facet joint pain can be diagnosed with local anesthetic blocks of the medial branches or of the facet joints themselves. Subsequent radiofrequency lesioning of the medial branches can provide more long-term pain relief. Despite some of the pitfalls associated with facet joint blocks, they have been shown to be valid, safe, and reliable as a diagnostic tool. Medial branch denervation has shown some promise for the sustained control of lumbar facet joint-mediated pain, but at this time, there is insufficient evidence that it is a wholly efficacious treatment option. Developing a universal algorithm for evaluating facet joint-mediated pain and standard procedural techniques may facilitate the performance of larger outcome studies. This review article provides an overview of the anatomy, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of facet joint-mediated pain

    Reprodutibilidade intra e interobservadores da classificação de hipersinal facetário lombar e correlação com a degeneração discal para ressonância magnética Reproducibilidad intra e inter observadores de la clasificación de hiperseñal facetaria lumbar y correlación con la degeneración discal para resonancia magnética Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of lumbar facet hypersignal rating and correlation with disc degeneration by magnetic resonance imaging

    No full text
    OBJETIVO: Avaliar a reprodutibilidade intra e interobservadores da "classificação de hipersinal facetário lombar" e avaliar a correlação com a degeneração discal. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de imagens de ressonância magnética obtidas de 41 (N=41) pacientes (18 homens e 23 mulheres), com idade variando de 26 a 84 anos, com média de 48 anos e três meses. As imagens foram revisadas por três ortopedistas especialistas em cirurgia de coluna e um radiologista, para avaliar e quantificar a presença do hipersinal facetário lombar. Posteriormente, foi verificada a relação entre a artrose facetária e degeneração discal. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados e classificados 205 discos lombares e suas facetas articulares pelos quatro examinadores, com os dados analisados pelo Teste de Cronbach e da Análise de Correlação de Spearman com resultados estatisticamente elevados, confirmando boa relação intra e interobservadores para a "classificação de hipersinal facetário". Não foi observada relação estatisticamente significante entre artrose facetária e degeneração discal. CONCLUSÃO: Foram obtidos resultados suficientes para afirmar que existe boa relação intra e interobservadores para a "classificação de hipersinal facetário lombar". Não se verificou relação estatisticamente significante entre artrose facetária e degeneração discal.<br>OBJETIVO: Evaluar la reproducibilidad inter e intra observadores de la "Clasificación de hiperseñal facetaria lumbar" y evaluar la correlación con la degeneración discal. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de imágenes de resonancia magnética obtenidas de 41 (N=41) pacientes (18 hombres y 23 mujeres), con la edad de 26 años hasta 84 años y, con promedio de 48 años y 3 meses. Las imágenes fueran revisadas por tres cirujanos ortopedistas especialistas en cirugía de columna vertebral y un radiólogo para evaluar y cuantificar la presencia de hiperseñal facetario lumbar. Después fue verificada la relación entre la artrosis facetaria y la degeneración del disco. RESULTADOS: Fueran evaluados y clasificados 205 discos lumbares y sus facetas articulares por los cuatro examinadores con las informaciones analizadas por la Prueba de Cronbach y el Análisis de Correlación de Spearman, con resultados estadísticamente elevados, confirmando buena relación inter e intra observadores para la "clasificación de hiperseñal facetaria" . No fue observada relación estadísticamente significativa entre artrosis facetaria y degeneración discal. CONCLUSIÓN: Fueran obtenidos resultados suficientes para asegurar que hay buena relación inter y intra observadores para la "Clasificación de hiperseñal facetaria" . No fue verificada relación estadísticamente significativa entre artrosis facetaria y degeneración discal.<br>OBJECTIVE: To assess intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of lumbar facet hypersignal rating and to assess the correlation with disc degeneration. METHODS: Retrospective study of magnetic resonance imaging of 41 patients (18 male and 23 female), with mean age of 48 years and three months (range 26-84 years). Three independent orthopaedic spine surgeons and one radiologist reviewed the images to assess and quantify the presence of lumbar facet hypersignal. Later, the relation between facet arthrosis and disc degeneration was evaluated. RESULTS: 205 lumbar discs and facets were assessed and rated by four independent observers, the records were analyzed by Cronbach test and Spearman correlation analysis with high statistical outcomes which confirm a good interobserver and intraobserver relation for lumbar facet hypersignal rating. No statistical difference between facet arthrosis and disc degeneration was verified. CONCLUSION: Sufficient outcomes were obtained to confirm the existence of good interobserver and intraobserver relation for lumbar facet hypersignal rating. No statistical difference between facet arthrosis and disc degeneration was verified
    corecore