Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has shown a significant survival advantage of trastuzumab. Although extant work in developed countries examined economic evaluation of trastuzumab in adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer based on the 1-year treatment, there is uncertainty about cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab in the Adjuvant Treatment of early breast cancer in developing countries. This study aimed to estimate cost-effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy compared to AC-T regimen in early breast cancer in Iran. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a Markov model to estimate outcomes and costs over a 20-year time period using a cohort of women with HER2 positive early breast cancer, treated with or without 12 months trastuzumab adjuvant chemotherapy. Transition probabilities were derived mainly from the BCIRG006 trial. Costs were estimated from the perspective of the Iranian health care system. Both costs and outcomes were discounted by 3. One-way sensitivity analysis was undertaken to assess the associated uncertainties in the expected output measures. RESULTS: On the basis of BCIRG006 trial, our model showed that adjuvant trastuzumab treatment in early breast cancer, yield 0.87 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) compared with AC-T regimen. Adjuvant trastuzumab treatment yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US 51302 per QALY. CONCLUSION: By using threshold of 3 times GDP per capita, as per World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation, 12 months trastuzumab adjuvant chemotherapy is not a cost-effective therapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in Iran

A Cost-Minimization Analysis of Day-Care Versus in-Patient Surgery for Five Most Common General Surgical Procedures

Objective: This study aimed to compare costs of Day-care versus in-patient surgery for five most common general surgical proce-dures in a general hospital in Iran. Methods: In this retrospective study the records of all patients who underwent five most common general surgical operations (in-cluding Hernia, Hemorrhoid, Fistula, Pilonidal Sinus and Varicocele) between March 2011 and March 2013 were reviewed. The data about costs of these procedures was collected by a checklist, designed by the authors, one year before and one year after establishing the Day-Care ward in the hospital. The checklist was designed on the basis of 14 financial items related to surgical patients. All costs were measured from the provider's perspective. Results: The results of this study showed that after implementing day-care surgery ward, inpatient care costs, such as medi-cine/drugs, physician visits, medical consumable, personnel and hotel, reduced significantly per each procedure. However, the costs directly associated with each surgery, such as drugs and consumable, surgeon's wage and anesthesia costs, between these two periods was not significantly different. The highest amount of savings was related to the personnel costs, with 997,000 IRR reductions. On average, total cost of each procedure was reduced by 2,031,358 IRR after implementation of day-care ward. Conclusion: The findings from this study demonstrate that day-care surgery is a cost saving method compared to in-patient surgery for five most common general surgical procedures. It is recommended that hospital managers consider establishing day-care ward and conducting surgical procedures, in particular elective general surgical procedures, in this regimen, to decrease hospital costs and to make hospital beds free, for other patients who are more in need of specialized medical and nursing skills

Informal payments for inpatient health care in post-health transformation plan period: evidence from Iran (vol 20, 539, 2020)

Correction to: BMC Public Health 20, 539 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8432-

Informal payments for inpatient health care in post-health transformation plan period: evidence from Iran

Background: In 2014, a revision of the national medical tariffs for inpatient health care services took place in Iran, and a new hotline was set up to report informal payments. It was expected that such measures would eliminate or decrease informal payments prevalence. This study estimates the prevalence of informal payments for inpatient health care services in the post-reform period, explores factors associated with informal payments and examines patients’ and healthcare providers’ views regarding the causes of informal payments and possible practical solutions for their reduction. Methods: We surveyed by phone patients who used inpatient health care services in seven Iranian hospitals in 2016. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to estimate the prevalence and determine factors associated with informal payments. We conducted a qualitative analysis through thematic analyses based on focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Results: Of 2696 respondents, 14% reported paying informally for inpatient services. Informal payments were reported more frequently among private hospital users, given more frequently to physicians in public teaching hospitals and ‘other staff’ in private hospitals, in the form of cash and voluntary. Being an adult, hospital or treatment type, being insured, and household head’s education influenced the probability of paying informally. The amount paid informally was associated with being insured, the educational status of the household’s head, household size, service, and hospital types. Based on qualitative findings, the leading causes of informal payments reported by patients and healthcare providers can be categorized into four groups - financing challenges; governance challenges; service delivery challenges; and actors and stakeholders. Modifying, adjusting and applying policy interventions; supervision, monitoring and evaluation; and actors and stakeholders were identified as possible solutions for tackling informal payment in the inpatient health care services. Conclusion: The prevalence of informal patient payments for inpatient services in the post-reform period seems to have reduced; however, they remain to be common. Regular monitoring, reviewing of payment policies to the physicians, informing patients, changing the behaviour of healthcare providers and patients, and developing ethical guidelines to prevent informal payments were suggested for reduction and elimination of informal payments in the Iranian healthcare sector. Keywords: Health expenditures, Informal payments, Iran, Health care reform, Health policy, Health policy and systems researc