2 research outputs found
The MOSAIC study - comparison of the Maudsley Model of Treatment for Adults with Anorexia Nervosa (MANTRA) with Specialist Supportive Clinical Management (SSCM) in outpatients with anorexia nervosa or eating disorder not otherwise specified,anorexia nervosa type: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Background: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a biologically based serious mental disorder with high levels of mortality
and disability, physical and psychological morbidity and impaired quality of life. AN is one of the leading causes of
disease burden in terms of years of life lost through death or disability in young women. Psychotherapeutic
interventions are the treatment of choice for AN, but the results of psychotherapy depend critically on the stage of
the illness. The treatment response in adults with a chronic form of the illness is poor and drop-out from treatment
is high. Despite the seriousness of the disorder the evidence-base for psychological treatment of adults with AN is
extremely limited and there is no leading treatment. There is therefore an urgent need to develop more effective
treatments for adults with AN. The aim of the Maudsley Outpatient Study of Treatments for Anorexia Nervosa and
Related Conditions (MOSAIC) is to evaluate the efficacy and cost effectiveness of two outpatient treatments for
adults with AN, Specialist Supportive Clinical Management (SSCM) and the Maudsley Model of Treatment for Adults
with Anorexia Nervosa (MANTRA).
Methods/Design: 138 patients meeting the inclusion criteria are randomly assigned to one of the two treatment
groups (MANTRA or SSCM). All participants receive 20 once-weekly individual therapy sessions (with 10 extra weekly
sessions for those who are severely ill) and four follow-up sessions with monthly spacing thereafter. There is also
optional access to a dietician and extra sessions involving a family member or a close other. Body weight, eating
disorder- related symptoms, neurocognitive and psychosocial measures, and service use data are measured during
the course of treatment and across a one year follow up period. The primary outcome measure is body mass index
(BMI) taken at twelve months after randomization.
Discussion: This multi-center study provides a large sample size, broad inclusion criteria and a follow-up period.
However, the study has to contend with difficulties directly related to running a large multi-center randomized
controlled trial and the psychopathology of AN. These issues are discussed.
Trial Registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67720902 - A Maudsley outpatient study of treatments for
anorexia nervosa and related conditions
The Maudsley outpatient study of treatments for anorexia nervosa and related conditions (MOSAIC): comparison of the Maudsley model of anorexia nervosa treatment for adults (MANTRA) with specialist supportive clinical management (SSCM) in outpatients with broadly defined anorexia nervosa: a randomized controlled trial
Objective: Anorexia nervosa (AN) in adults has poor outcomes, and treatment evidence is limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of a novel, targeted psychological therapy for AN (Maudsley Model of Anorexia Nervosa Treatment for Adults; MANTRA) compared with Specialist Supportive Clinical Management (SSCM). Method: One hundred forty-two outpatients with broadly defined AN (body mass index [BMI] ≤ 18.5 kg/m2) were randomly allocated to receive 20 to 30 weekly sessions (depending on clinical severity) plus add-ons (4 follow-up sessions, optional sessions with dietician and with carers) of MANTRA (n = 72) or SSCM (n = 70). Assessments were administered blind to treatment condition at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after randomization. The primary outcome was BMI at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included eating disorders symptomatology, other psychopathology, neuro-cognitive and social cognition, and acceptability. Additional service utilization was also assessed. Outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results: Both treatments resulted in significant improvements in BMI and reductions in eating disorders symptomatology, distress levels, and clinical impairment over time, with no statistically significant difference between groups at either 6 or 12 months. Improvements in neuro-cognitive and social–cognitive measures over time were less consistent. One SSCM patient died. Compared with SSCM, MANTRA patients rated their treatment as significantly more acceptable and credible at 12 months. There was no significant difference between groups in additional service consumption. Conclusions: Both treatments appear to have value as first-line outpatient interventions for patients with broadly defined AN. Longer term outcomes remain to be evaluated