8 research outputs found
Clinical, angiographic and procedural correlates of quantitative coronary dimensions after directional coronary atherectomy
AbstractTo define the clinical, angiographic and procedural correlates of quantitative coronary dimensions after directional coronary atherectomy, 400 lesions in 378 patients were analyzed with use of qualitative morphologic and quantitative angiographic methods. Successful atherectomy, defined by a <75% residual area stenosis, tissue retrieval and the absence of in-hospital ischemic complications, was performed in 351 lesions (87.7%). After atherectomy, minimal cross-sectional area increased from 1.2 ± 1.1 to 6.6 ± 4.4 mm2(p < 0.001) and percent area stenosis was reduced from 87 ± 10% to 31 ± 42% (p < 0.001).By univariate analysis, device size (p < 0.001) and left circumflex artery lesion location (p = 0.004) were associated with a larger final minimal cross-sectional area. Conversely, restenotic lesion (p = 0.002), lesion length ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.018) and lesion calcification (p = 0.035) were quantitatively associated with a smaller final minimum cross-sectional area. With use of stepwise multivariate analysis to control for the reference area, atherectomy device size (p = 0.003) and left circumflex lesion location (p = 0.007) were independently associated with a larger final minimal cross-sectional area, whereas restenotic lesion (p = 0.010), diffuse proximal disease (p = 0.033), lesion length ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.026) and lesion calcification (p = 0.081) were significantly correlated with a smaller final minimal cross-sectional area. The number of specimens excised, the number of atherectomy passes and atherectomy balloon inflation pressure did not correlate with the final minimal cross-sectional area.Thus, directional atherectomy results in marked improvement of coronary lumen dimensions, at least in part correlated with the presence of certain clinical, angiographic and procedural factors at the time of atherectomy
Recommended from our members
Impact of diabetes on five-year outcomes after vein graft interventions performed prior to the drug-eluting stent era.
Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in 5-year outcomes among diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing saphenous vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to the era of distal protection and drug-eluting stents. Background. PCI of native coronary arteries is known to be associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes in diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic patients. However, the impact of diabetes on long-term outcomes after SVG interventions is not as well established. We conducted an evaluation of 5-year outcomes after SVG PCI in the two decades prior to the availability of distal protection devices and drug-eluting stents. Methods. Data on 2,556 subjects (1,780 nondiabetic and 776 diabetic) undergoing SVG PCI at Emory Hospital from 1981 to 2001 were collected and entered into a computerized database and analyzed for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Results. Compared to the nondiabetic group, the diabetic group had worse 1-year (87.7% vs. 94.9%; p < 0.0001) and 5-year survival rates (62.9% vs. 78.5%; p < 0.0001). In the subset of patients receiving stents, 5-year survival remained significantly worse in the diabetic group (78.2% vs. 87.1%; p = 0.009). After multivariate analysis, diabetes was an independent predictor of 5-year mortality (hazard ratio = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.5-2.5; p < 0.0001). Conclusion. Diabetic patients undergoing vein graft PCI prior to the distal protection and drug-eluting stent era had significantly worse long-term outcomes compared to nondiabetic patients. The effect on long-term outcomes using these newer devices in diabetic subjects undergoing SVG PCI must be established for a true assessment of their impact
Recommended from our members
Abstract 2905: Low Pre-Procedural High-Density Lipoprotein and Death at One Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Background: Low HDL cholesterol is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but its prognostic importance after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is not well established. Methods: We examined 1-year outcomes in 2,092 patients undergoing PCI between 2001 and 2004 at Emory University. Patients were divided into quartiles by HDL level and were followed for 1 year. Using logistic regression, we compared 1-year clinical outcomes according to HDL quartiles after adjusting for demographic and comorbidity factors. Results: The baseline clinical characteristics were comparable among HDL quartiles except women were less represented in the lower quartiles. Patients in the lowest quartile (HDL mean 30, range 10–34) had a significantly increased rate of death compared to the other quartiles in both bivariate (Table) and multivariate analyses. There was no difference noted with regards to non-fatal myocardial infarction or revascularization. The adjusted hazard ratio of death for the lowest quartile compared to the highest quartile was 3.0 (95% CI: 1.6–5.5), no significant difference was noted among the other quartiles (Figure). No significant differences were noted in any of the outcomes assessed between quartiles 2, 3, and 4. Conclusion: Low HDL levels
Recommended from our members
Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention of ostial versus nonostial narrowing of the major epicardial coronary arteries
Recommended from our members