The Association of Oral Bisphosphonate Use With Mortality Risk Following a Major Osteoporotic Fracture in the United Kingdom:Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES: Bisphosphonates (BPs) might have extra benefits in reducing mortality because of their anti-atherosclerotic effects, but studies reported conflicting results. We investigated the association between oral BP use and mortality risk following a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) in the United Kingdom. DESIGN: This was a population-based cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 163,273 adults aged 50 years and older with an MOF between 2000 and 2018 from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of all-cause mortality in current (0‒6 months), recent (7‒12 months), and past (>1 year) exposures to oral BPs after nonhip MOF and hip fracture. In addition, stratification by sex, BP type, and duration of follow-up was performed. RESULTS: Compared with never users of oral BPs, current BP use was associated with a 7% higher all-cause mortality risk after nonhip MOF, whereas a 28% lower all-cause mortality risk was observed after hip fracture. Past BP exposure was associated with a 14% and 42% lower risk after nonhip MOF and hip fracture, respectively. When considering only the first 5 years of follow-up, mortality risk associated with current BP use was significantly lower for both fracture groups, and the greatest reduction in mortality risk was observed within the first year. Women had slightly lower risk compared with men. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We found a slight increased risk of all-cause mortality with current BP exposure after a nonhip MOF; however, a protective effect was observed following a hip fracture. Both the timing and the effect size of an association based on the anti-atherosclerotic hypothesis of BPs are not supported by our results. The decreasing trend of the mortality risk with shorter durations of follow-up suggests that the observed association is likely due to unknown distortion or unknown pleiotropic properties of BPs

Prevention of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis with alendronate or alfacalcidol:Relations of change in bone mineral density, bone markers, and calcium homeostasis

Objective. To explore the relation of changes in measures of bone turnover and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and total hip over 18 months in a double-blinded, randomized trial, comparing the effect of alfacalcidol (101 patients) versus alendronate (100 patients) on BMD in patients who recently started treatment with glucocorticoids for various rheumatic diseases. Methods. Associations between changes in serum procollagen type I C-propeptide (P1CP), fasting urine N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), serum calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), osteocalcin, and change from baseline in BMD over 18 months were explored with regression and correlation analyses. Results. In both treatment groups, there was a statistically significant decrease in NTx. In the alfacalcidol group there was also a significant increase in P1CP and osteocalcin, in contrast to the alendronate group, but BMD in the alfacalcidol decreased versus an increase in the alendronate group (p <0.001). In neither treatment group were changes in biochemical measures correlated with the change in BMD, with the exception of a negative correlation in the alendronate group between changes in total hip BMD and NTx. Use of alendronate resulted in an increased PTH in 27 patients, but the increase in BMD of these patients was not statistically significantly different compared to patients taking alendronate with normal PTH levels. Conclusion. Changes in BMD were not associated with changes in bone measures, with the exception of NTx in the alendronate group. For the patient taking glucocorticoids in clinical practice, the value of serial assessment of bone markers is low; changes in markers are no substitute for changes in BMD

Timing of Subsequent Fractures after an Initial Fracture

A prior fracture is a well-documented risk factor for a subsequent fracture and it doubles the risk of subsequent fractures. Few studies have investigated the time that elapses between the initial and subsequent fracture. These studies show that the subsequent fracture risk is not constant, but fluctuates over time. The risk of subsequent vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral non-hip fractures is highest immediately after initial hip, clinical, and radiographic vertebral fractures and nonvertebral fractures and declines afterward, regardless of gender, age, and initial fracture location. These studies indicate the need for early action after an initial fracture with medical interventions that have an effect within a short term to reduce the preventable risks of subsequent fractures

Evaluation of patients with a recent clinical fracture and osteoporosis, a multidisciplinary approach

The aetiology of osteoporotic fractures is multifactorial, but little is known about the way to evaluate patients with a recent clinical fracture for the presence of secondary osteoporosis

Patient preference and acceptability of calcium plus vitamin D3 supplementation: a randomised, open, cross-over trial

Preference for a drug formulation is important in adherence to long-term medication for chronic illnesses such as osteoporosis. We investigated the preference for and acceptability of chewable tablet containing calcium and vitamin D (Calci Chew D3, Nycomed) compared to that of a sachet containing calcium and vitamin D3 (Cad, Will-Pharma). This open, randomised, cross-over trial was set up to compare the preference and acceptability of two calcium plus vitamin D3 formulations (both with 500 mg calcium and 400/440 IU vitamin D3), given twice a day in patients with osteoporosis. Preference and acceptability were assessed by means of questionnaires. Preference was determined by asking the question, which treatment the patient preferred, and acceptability was measured by scoring five variables, using rating scales. Of the 102 patients indicating a preference for a trial medication, 67% preferred the chewable tablet, 19% the sachet with calcium and vitamin D3, and 15% stated no preference. The significant preference for Calci Chew D3 (p < 0.0001) was associated with higher scores for all five acceptability variables. The two formulations were tolerated equally well. A significant greater number of patients considered the chewable tablet as preferable and acceptable to the sachet, containing calcium and vitamin D3. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18822358

被服に対する意識及び行動とそれに影響する要因

博士（学術）神戸大